The chaos of commercial hours in Spain: 389 different regulations drive the consumer crazy

The Retail Restrictiveness Indicator of the European Commission places Spain as the third country in the EU with the most restrictions for commercial opening. 19 autonomous calendars and 370 municipal regulations that condition when and where stores can open.

7 minutes

horarios comerciales

horarios comerciales

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

7 minutes

Most read

Buying an appliance, a piece of furniture, or a garment on a Sunday can be easy or impossible depending on the autonomous community, the municipality, or even the street where the establishment is located. The study The chaos of schedules: 390 regulations on commercial hours, prepared by La Distribución Anged, counts 19 autonomous calendars and 370 municipal regulations that make up a framework of 389 different rules on commercial hours in Spain.

The report identifies this fragmentation as one of the main features of the current regulatory model. In the midst of the digital era, marked by the strong competition from Asian platforms like Shein, Temu, and Aliexpress (the latter two recently sanctioned by the Commission for serious violations), any store larger than 300 square meters may be forced to close 56 Sundays and holidays a year in most of Spain.

Spain, among the European countries with the most restrictions

The Retail Restrictiveness Indicator from the European Commission indicates that Spain is the third country in the European Union with the most restrictions regarding commercial hours, only behind Austria and Germany. It also notes that 12 European countries have full freedom of hours —Portugal, Italy, Sweden, Finland, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Croatia, Luxembourg, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Bulgaria— and that five others enjoy almost total flexibility: Denmark, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, and Romania.

The document also highlights that stores larger than 300 square meters are the only establishments in the entire service sector that are legally prohibited from opening on Sundays and holidays.

For La Distribución Anged, the regulation of commercial hours constitutes "a paradigmatic example of the fragmentation of the single market and the overlapping of restrictions" and represents "an attack on the freedom of choice of consumers".

The association argues that many citizens need flexibility, or simply want to dedicate part of their free time to shopping, and that any other service activity can open on those days and organize its offer in the way it considers most appropriate for its customers.

A labyrinth of 389 rules

The regulation that governs this aspect in Spain is the Commercial Hours Law, which establishes that each autonomous community must authorize at least ten Sundays and holidays for stores larger than 300 square meters. From that minimum, each territory develops its own calendar, resulting in 19 different autonomous regulations.

Currently, most autonomous communities remain at that legal minimum. Only the Community of Madrid and Ceuta allow total freedom of hours. Andalusia, the Region of Murcia, and Melilla authorize 16 Sundays and holidays; Castilla-La Mancha, 12; the Community of Valencia, 11; Aragon, Balearic Islands, Canary Islands, Cantabria, Castilla y León, Catalonia, Extremadura, Galicia, La Rioja, and Asturias, 10; Navarra, 9; and the Basque Country, 8.

In the words of Anged, most of the regulations approved since the 1990s have had "a single objective: to roll back commercial freedom and discriminate against certain business models". The association believes that a company operating throughout the national territory ends up subjected to 19 autonomous calendars and 370 municipal regulations that create "artificial borders for consumers".

The Areas of High Tourist Affluence multiply the differences

To the autonomous regulations are added the 370 Areas of High Tourist Affluence (ZGAT) spread throughout Spain. Specifically, Catalonia concentrates 90 ZGAT; the Community of Valencia, 74; Canary Islands, 49; Balearic Islands, 44; and Andalusia, 35. The rest are distributed among the other autonomous communities.

This figure was created in 2012 to advance commercial freedom in those municipalities that met a series of requirements. However, they comment in Anged, the ZGAT "have achieved the opposite effect". The association claims that numerous municipalities and autonomous communities have limited the streets and periods of application, "even going so far" as to expressly exclude stores larger than 300 square meters to maintain the statu quo of the restrictions. Likewise, it argues that the logic used to justify the autonomous calendars and the ZGAT "is anticompetitive". "No one would think of imposing by law what days one can have a drink or go out to dinner, go to the movies, or spend a night in a hotel. This absurdity only applies to commerce," they emphasize in Distribution.

The report illustrates this situation with several examples: in Catalonia, during some Sundays and holidays in June, it is possible to buy fireworks, but a consumer who wants to change the refrigerator, buy a bed, or acquire a swimsuit must do so online or look for a store located within a ZGAT. It also mentions cases such as those of Granada, Córdoba, San Sebastián, La Coruña, Zaragoza, or Santa Cruz de Tenerife among many others, where the delimitation of these zones creates a "border effect" between adjacent streets.

An unequal map: this is how hours change according to the city

Gathering data from the Ministry of Economy, Finance, and Employment of the Community of Madrid, the report indicates that the commercial freedom implemented in 2012 has resulted in more than 2.68 billion euros in additional regional GDP and the creation of more than 15,500 jobs.

Barcelona features in another of the highlighted cases. The study recalls that in 2022 the city expanded its Zone of High Tourist Affluence, allowing it to open 20 Sundays and holidays between May 15 and September 15, from 12:00 to 20:00 hours and only in eight districts. Citing data from Barcelona Oberta, the report notes that during the first year this measure generated 306 million euros in additional commercial turnover, an annual increase of 9.5% in sales, and between 1,600 and 1,800 additional jobs.

In Andalusia, they highlight Málaga as the city that has bet the most on commercial freedom, compared to Seville, where the opening is limited to certain streets and periods, and to Córdoba, Granada, and Jerez, whose current City Councils - after the push for business freedom achieved in the last legislature - have returned their cities to a very restrictive model for commercial activity more typical of the 80s – when ecommerce did not even exist – than of today's consumption reality.

Likewise, it mentions striking examples such as A Coruña, where the delimitation of the ZGAT includes the surroundings of the Tower of Hercules and the San Amaro cemetery, as well as those of Badajoz and Vigo, where the study indicates that the current restrictions cause some consumers to cross the border into Portugal to make their purchases taking advantage of the commercial freedom existing in the neighboring country.

The rise of Temu and Shein

With data from the Tax Agency collected in the investigation, Spain is the country with the highest penetration of Asian platforms and one in three packages purchased online comes from China. Furthermore, the number of shipments under 150 euros, exempt from tariff payments, has quadrupled since 2021 to exceed 200 million packages per year.

Anged asks: "Would anyone think of disconnecting the mobile data network on Sundays to avoid shopping online?". The association argues that today "it is easier to import products from China through a digital platform than to open a store on a Sunday" and considers that, with the prohibition of opening on Sundays and holidays, "we are giving away almost two months to platforms like Temu or Shein free of competition".

The problems of commerce go far beyond Sundays

The study identifies a series of factors that, in the opinion of Distribution, explain the main challenges of commerce beyond the regulation of hours. Among them are the increase in costs, generational change, digitalization, social changes, the lack of professionals, absenteeism, and greater rigidity of the labor market.

Extracting information from the Spanish Confederation of Commerce (CEC), the report points out that one in three small businesses cannot find a successor for their business and that 70% will end up closing. The text also notes that there are 16,000 unfilled vacancies due to a lack of professionals with the appropriate training and that urban concentration, population aging, and new consumption habits have forced the sector to reinvent itself.

Anged's experts assert that "closing stores on Sunday does not solve any of the structural problems of commerce". For them, the increase in taxes, the rise in contributions for self-employed workers, new regulations in areas such as the environment, the increase in the minimum wage, or time registration have added costs and reduced the margins of the sector, so they argue that commerce, regardless of its size, needs "a regulatory, fiscal, and labor environment favorable to investment and growth".

What impact would reducing trade barriers have

With estimates included in the European Commission's Single Market Strategy, the study indicates that removing only 10% of the existing barriers in retail would allow for an increase of 9.55 billion euros in the production of the Spanish economy, measured in terms of Gross Value Added (GVA). It adds that this improvement could be achieved at no fiscal cost to the taxpayer through a reform aimed at simplifying the regulatory framework and promoting market unity.

They emphasize that trade constitutes a strategic ecosystem for the Spanish economy: for every 100 direct jobs, it generates another 59 indirect ones in sectors such as energy, industry, agri-food, logistics, technology, security, cleaning, or consulting. Spain, they indicate in Anged, "has enormous growth potential" if public officials decisively address the promotion of the internal single market and implement effective measures to remove the country from the group of member states with the highest restrictions on commercial hours.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What is the status of the processing of possible reforms to unify commercial hours in Spain?

As of today (September 2026), there is no specific state reform in process, with a known text, aimed at generally unifying commercial hours throughout Spain. The framework remains that of the state law on commercial hours, under which each autonomous community develops its own regulation and opening schedules on Sundays and holidays, resulting in a very fragmented mosaic.

According to the report by Demócrata on “the chaos of commercial hours,” the sector currently operates with around 389 different regulations (19 regional regulations and about 370 municipal ordinances or agreements linked, for example, to Tourist High Traffic Zones). The state law sets a minimum of ten Sundays and holidays for opening for large stores, but from there each community defines its calendar and the use of exceptions, which means consumers and chains face very different rules depending on the territory, city, and even street.

In this context, there have indeed been political and sectoral movements, but without yet materializing into a unifying reform:

  • Sumar initiative in Congress: the deputy from Compromís and deputy spokesperson of Sumar, Alberto Ibáñez, has announced that he will register a bill to modify the state regulation of commercial hours with the aim of limiting the margin of the autonomous communities and avoiding what he calls a “free pass” to open every Sunday, especially in territories with total freedom like the Community of Madrid. It is a parliamentary group initiative, still in the political announcement and text preparation phase, not a government project.
  • Regional and local adjustments: detailed rules affecting hours continue to be approved, but without the ambition of state unification. For example:
    • Regional orders and resolutions that set the annual calendar of Sundays and holidays for opening (such as the Andalusian Order of June 10, 2026, for 2027 or resolutions from the Generalitat Valenciana on business days for commercial activity).
    • Specific provisions on tourist high traffic zones that expand or restrict Sunday openings (for example, the Canary Islands resolution that extends the special regime for the municipality of Santa Úrsula to all Sundays).
    • Municipal market ordinances (València, Alicante) that adjust the internal hours of municipal markets and their alignment with the regional commercial hours regulations.
    These are relevant changes for each territory but reinforce the idea of a polycentric system rather than convergence towards a single schedule.
  • Pressure from large retail employers’ associations: the National Association of Large Distribution Companies (ANGED) has made the issue one of its pillars. In the study cited by Demócrata, it describes the regulation of hours as a “paradigmatic example of market fragmentation” and calls for more freedom and regulatory simplification. In another sector document, it is emphasized that there are “390 regulations on commercial hours” and this tangle is linked to lower productivity levels and difficulty growing.
  • Regulatory debate at the CNMC: at a session of the National Commission on Markets and Competition about commercial distribution, summarized on its blog “How to improve competition in commercial distribution”, various speakers (including the ANGED employers’ association and regional representatives) explicitly debated hours. Two views were confronted:
    • Those who defend respecting companies’ freedom to set hours (as in Madrid) to gain competitiveness and respond to the rise of online commerce.
    • Those who emphasize the need to limit openings for reasons of work-life balance and labor organization, closer to union positions and part of small commerce.
    The CNMC, in general terms, warns that territorial fragmentation harms the internal market and advocates some form of harmonization and simplification, but has not proposed a specific regulatory text.
  • Positions of consumers and unions: although the documents reviewed do not show a specific campaign by OCU or other associations focused on “unifying” hours, their participation in debates on work-life balance and the convenience of setting limits on holiday openings is noted. In parallel, union organizations link the issue of hours and openings with negotiations on working hours and time registration.

In summary, the status of processing is that of an open and highly politicized debate on whether to move towards more freedom and homogenization or towards more limits for work-life balance, but today:

  • There is no government bill to unify commercial hours nationwide.
  • There is an announcement of a Sumar bill, yet to be registered or without detailed public progress, which would be more restrictive for the autonomous communities that liberalize to the maximum.
  • Reform pressure mainly comes from large retail and bodies like the CNMC, which call for simplification and less fragmentation, against the defense of regional powers and arguments of labor and family work-life balance.

Any real unification reform would practically require an amendment of the basic state legislation on commercial hours that rebalances powers with the autonomous communities, something that has not yet gone beyond the political and sectoral debate phase.

What are the competencies of the autonomous communities regarding the regulation of commercial hours according to current legislation?

The regulation of commercial hours in Spain is structured as a shared matter between the State and the autonomous communities. The basic framework is set by the State, mainly through Law 1/2004, of December 21, on Commercial Hours, while the autonomous communities have significant leeway to specify and modulate those hours within the state limits. Law 7/1996, on Retail Trade Regulation, as the general sector law, completes this scheme.

1. Competence title and role of the State

Law 1/2004 is enacted under the Article 149.1.13 of the Constitution, which grants the State exclusive competence over the bases and organization of economic activity. In its preamble and final provision, the law makes clear that:

  • The State sets a uniform basic framework of commercial hours throughout the national territory.
  • This framework is enacted “respecting the competencies in internal commerce of the autonomous communities,” which are those who, in their territory, exercise development and execution powers.

This basic idea has been supported and nuanced by the Constitutional Court in various rulings on competence conflicts in commercial hours (for example, STC 164/2006 on the Community of Madrid, STC 140/2011 and STC 211/2016 and 25/2017 regarding laws of the Balearic Islands and Catalonia). The consolidated criterion is that the State can impose a minimum level of liberalization for competition and market unity purposes, and the communities can develop regulation without contradicting that basic level.

2. What the State sets: bases and minimums

From Law 1/2004 itself, especially its central articles, the elements that correspond to the State to set are derived:

  • General principle of freedom of hours: within the law’s framework, each merchant freely determines their opening and closing hours, the holidays for opening, and the number of daily or weekly hours.
  • Minimum weekly schedule limit on working days: communities cannot restrict the overall schedule on working days to less than 90 hours per week.
  • State minimum of Sundays and holidays for opening: a minimum number of 16 Sundays or holidays per year is set on which businesses may open. Communities can modify that figure but never below 10.
  • Full freedom regime for certain establishments: the law declares total freedom of hours nationwide, as a basic rule, for:
    • Certain establishments (pastry shops, bakeries, press, fuel stations, florists, “convenience stores,” etc.).
    • Establishments of small useful surface (generally under 300 m²), unless they belong to large distribution groups.
  • Definition and minimum effects of tourist high traffic zones: basic criteria are established for their configuration and the essential consequence of their declaration (full freedom of hours in those areas).

Constitutional case law has declared unconstitutional regional provisions that narrowed these basic margins (for example, reducing Sundays of opening below the state minimum or introducing generalized restrictions on freedom of hours in tourist high traffic zones).

3. What the autonomous communities can do

Within this framework, Law 1/2004 expressly recognizes that the autonomous communities have the competence to regulate opening and closing hours of businesses in their territory, provided they respect the state bases. Practically, they can:

  • Set the specific calendar of Sundays and holidays for opening, starting from the state minimum and being able to expand or, within limits, reduce it.
  • Distribute the hours within the weekly cap: although they cannot go below 90 total hours on working days, they can establish higher maximum weekly limits or certain time slots, always without emptying the freedom that the basic rule grants merchants.
  • Regulate public information obligations about the hours of establishments in their territorial scope.
  • Define tourist high traffic zones, at the proposal of municipalities, applying the basic criteria established by state law (tourist concentration, World Heritage, cruise ports, major events, shopping tourism, etc.) and being able to territorially or temporally limit those zones if adequately justified.
  • Specifically regulate certain types of establishments (for example, those exclusively dedicated to cultural products), always within the basic limits.
  • Establish the sanctioning regime for violations of regional regulations on calendars and commercial hours, linking that power to their competence over internal commerce.
  • Allow municipalities to agree on special closures of establishments selling alcoholic beverages for public order reasons, issuing the corresponding enabling rules.
4. Recent reforms and general trend

Reforms of Law 1/2004, especially through Royal Decree-Law 20/2012 and subsequent laws, have gone in the direction of increasing liberalization: expanding the minimum Sundays and holidays for opening, raising the minimum weekly hours, and reinforcing freedom in tourist high traffic zones. Each reform has forced communities to adapt their regulations but without losing their role as detailed regulators in internal commerce. Law 7/1996, reformed several times (for example, in 2010 and 2014), acts as the general framework for retail trade and reinforces the requirement that any regional intervention in the sector respects free competition and market unity.

What requirements must a municipality meet to be declared a Tourist High Traffic Zone (ZGAT)?

A Tourist High Traffic Zone (ZGAT) is an area of a municipality — or the entire municipal area — where, due to the special weight of tourism, a much broader regime of freedom of commercial hours is allowed than the general one. Its basic regulation is in Law 1/2004, on Commercial Hours, mainly modified by Royal Decree-Law 20/2012 and Royal Decree-Law 8/2014.

Concept and main effects

From the state point of view, a ZGAT is the territorial scope in which, due to certain tourist circumstances, businesses have full freedom to determine the days and hours of opening, especially on Sundays and holidays. This freedom particularly affects:

  • Establishments included in the general hours regime (not only those that already had freedom due to their type or size).
  • The Sunday and holiday campaign, where the state minimum/maximum limits that apply outside ZGAT disappear.

Autonomous communities can modulate specific aspects, but constitutional jurisprudence (for example, STC 140/2011, STC 195/2016) has confirmed that the State can impose this freedom of hours as basic regulation in ZGAT.

Who declares the ZGAT and on whose initiative

The competence scheme set by Law 1/2004 is, in summary:

  • Main initiative: corresponds to the Municipality, which submits a reasoned proposal for the declaration of ZGAT, delimiting the scope (whole municipality or part) and, if applicable, the temporal period (all year, seasons, specific time slots).
  • Declaration: corresponds to the Autonomous Community, which decides on the municipal proposal and issues the resolution declaring the ZGAT for its territory.
  • Autonomous silence: if the community does not resolve within the period set in its regulations, and failing that within six months, the municipal proposal for ZGAT is understood as approved as proposed.

Requirements and criteria to be a ZGAT

The basic state regulation lists a series of objective circumstances. An area coinciding with the whole municipality or part of it can be declared ZGAT if at least one of them occurs:

  • Sufficient concentration of tourist offer or second homes: a significant number, quantitatively or qualitatively, of places in accommodations and tourist establishments, or a high proportion of second homes compared to habitual-use dwellings.
  • High-level cultural heritage: that the municipality has been declared World Heritage or that in the area there is a cultural asset of interest integrated into the historical-artistic heritage.
  • Border areas: that the area borders border zones or is part of their influence area, where cross-border visitor flow generates great commercial and tourist activity.
  • Major sporting or cultural events: holding major events of national or international character that intensely and recurrently attract visitors (sports competitions, festivals, fairs, etc.).
  • Proximity to cruise ports: closeness to port areas where tourist cruises operate with a significant passenger flow.
  • Shopping tourism: areas whose main attraction is commerce (reference commercial streets and neighborhoods, outlets, “shopping” axes with strong tourist pull).
  • Other special circumstances that, with justification, warrant the declaration, considering commercial, tourist interests and consumer benefit.

Motivation obligations and territorial/temporal limits

The regulation requires that both the Municipality’s request and the Autonomous Community’s resolution be properly reasoned with objective criteria. In particular:

  • If the Municipality proposes a limited ZGAT (only some neighborhoods, or only certain times of the year), it must justify why that restriction is coherent with commercial and tourist interests and consumer benefit.
  • If the Autonomous Community considers that limitation is not well justified, it can expand the scope by declaring the entire municipality and the whole year as ZGAT.

Cases of mandatory declaration in large cities

After the 2012 and 2014 reforms, Law 1/2004 establishes a reinforced criterion: in municipalities with more than 100,000 inhabitants that, in the previous year:

  • have recorded more than 600,000 hotel overnight stays, or
  • have ports with more than 400,000 cruise ship passengers,

at least one ZGAT must be declared. If, within six months from the publication of those data, the Autonomous Community has not declared it, the entire municipality is understood to be declared ZGAT for the whole year, with full freedom of commercial hours.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

How many different regulations on commercial hours does the La Distribución Anged report count in Spain?

Question 1 of 3

Which autonomous communities allow total freedom of commercial hours for stores larger than 300 square meters?

Question 2 of 3

Which country is the third in the European Union with the most restrictions on commercial hours according to the European Commission?

Question 3 of 3

Hola, soy Fren. ¿Cómo te ayudo?