The earthquake of magnitude 7.4 that shook Colombia during the morning of August 10 left a shared feeling among many of those who experienced it: the movement seemed to last for a long time. The Colombian Geological Service (SGC) has now provided a technical reference to that perception. The monitoring stations closest to the epicenter, located in San José del Palmar, Chocó, recorded between 90 seconds and two minutes of significant movement.
The data, however, needs precision. It does not mean that all people felt the earthquake for exactly a minute and a half or two minutes. The SGC itself has explained that answering the question of how long an earthquake lasts depends on what is being measured: the perception of a person, the recording of the instruments, or the physical process that occurs at the place where the rupture begins.
Between a minute and a half and two minutes near the epicenter
The earthquake occurred at 7:34 hours on Monday, August 10, reached a magnitude of 7.4, and had its epicenter in San José del Palmar, in the department of Chocó. The latest data released by the SGC places its depth around 100 kilometers.
After analyzing the records from its network, the agency explained that the stations closest to the epicenter detected approximately between 90 seconds and two minutes of significant movement. That interval constitutes the clearest instrumental reference available to answer how long the earthquake lasted.
Seismometers, however, have a much greater sensitivity than people. The SGC reminds that these instruments can continue detecting seismic waves even when the movement has already ceased to be perceptible to those on the surface. Therefore, the time recorded at a station and the time a person remembers feeling do not have to coincide.
Why some people felt it for longer
The Colombian Geological Service points out several factors that explain why two people may provide different answers when asked how long the same earthquake lasted.
One of them is the distance to the hypocenter, the point inside the Earth where the rupture begins. The characteristics of the terrain and the type of building in which each person is located also influence.
The ground has special importance. In areas composed of more rigid rocks, seismic waves tend to amplify less, while certain softer soils can amplify the movement and make the shaking be felt for a longer time.
For that reason, that a person in a city claims to have felt the earthquake for a few seconds and another considers that it lasted much longer does not necessarily imply that one of the testimonies is incorrect.
Why a magnitude 7.4 earthquake can last so long
The seismologist of the SGC Luisa Castillo explained on Caracol Radio that the duration is also related to the size of the event itself. The earthquake in San José del Palmar was a large magnitude quake and the process of energy release associated with the displacement of large masses of rock can extend from several seconds to minutes.
Castillo pointed out that the earthquake occurred in a zone of interaction between the Nazca and South American plates, where the former is being subducted under the latter through a subduction process. This tectonic dynamic is capable of generating large earthquakes and explains the origin of the episode recorded this Monday.
The duration that a person feels, however, still cannot be directly equated to the time during which that process occurs at depth.
Three different answers to the same question
The SGC proposes, in fact, to distinguish three issues when asking how long an earthquake lasted: how long it was perceived by people, how long the waves were recorded by instruments, and how long the rupture process that caused the quake lasted.
For the earthquake in Colombia on August 10, the most concrete answer available is in the instruments located near San José del Palmar: between one and a half and two minutes of significant movement.
From there, the experience could vary considerably depending on the distance to the earthquake's origin, the terrain, and the construction from which each person experienced the shaking. It is that difference that explains why, after the quake, some testimonies described a movement apparently much more prolonged than others.