Lobbies without registration but with obligations: what interest groups can do until they are registered

The Transparency Council has not yet enabled the mandatory form, although the regulation is already in force and requires registration before engaging in influence activities before the General Administration of the State.

5 minutes

fotonoticia 20260825142651 1920

fotonoticia 20260825142651 1920

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

5 minutes

Most read

The new Registry of Interest Groups of the General State Administration still does not allow for the processing of registrations. The Council of Transparency and Good Governance, responsible for managing it, limits itself to announcing that the electronic form will be available "soon" and that its opening will be communicated through official channels.

The delay poses a practical problem. Royal Decree-Law 21/2026, known as the Lobby Law, came into force on August 27 and establishes that registration must occur before carrying out an influence activity.

First problem: the regulation does not include a suspension of this obligation until the form is enabled nor does it establish a specific transitional regime for this period.

The text itself exceptionally admits a first contact with a group not yet registered if its representatives commit in writing to request registration within the next three business days. However, it is also not possible to meet that deadline while the electronic procedure remains closed.

These are the main questions and answers disseminated by the Council of Transparency to delineate who is affected by the regulation, what activities are subject to it, and which can continue to be carried out without registration.

What can lobbies do while the form is not available?

The regulation does not offer an express solution for the period between its entry into force and the effective opening of the registry. There is also no general authorization in the Council's frequently asked questions to carry out influence activities without being registered.

Until the procedure is enabled, groups can carry out actions that the law itself excludes from the concept of influence: participate in regulated public information procedures, submit allegations as interested parties, intervene in regulated advisory bodies, provide legal defense in administrative procedures, or exercise the rights of petition, assembly, and demonstration.

As for meetings or communications that do aim to influence, the only exceptional avenue provided is the commitment to request registration within the next three business days. But its application is problematic while there is no form through which to fulfill that obligation.

And that is a problem. Several ministries have denied meetings to interest groups due to the requirement of being duly registered, despite the fact that as of today it is not possible.

For this reason, groups can prepare in advance the information they must provide, review their internal procedures, identify the personnel who carry out this activity, and keep a record of meetings, communications, and documents. Internal preparation does not equate to being registered nor does it alone enable the maintenance of influence activities.

What obligations must interest groups already comply with?

The entry into force of the regulation subjects groups and those acting on their behalf to principles of conduct. They must identify themselves to the public official, explain the interests they defend, and, when appropriate, indicate whom they represent.

They must also provide accurate information, act transparently and honestly, respect confidentiality, and avoid any actions that may mislead or cause a conflict of interest.

They cannot offer gifts, favors, or advantageous services, exert abusive pressure, obtain information unlawfully, or simultaneously represent conflicting interests without the informed consent of the affected parties.

The regulation also requires keeping data updated, ensuring the publicity of meetings and contacts, informing their own personnel of the new rules, and collaborating with the Transparency Council.

When the system is operational, the information and documents related to an influence activity must be delivered within a maximum of 15 business days. Publicity will be the general rule, although a motivated request for a limitation of access may be made for legally provided reasons, such as data protection, security, or commercial confidentiality.

What is considered an influence activity?

Any direct or indirect communication with public personnel or officials aimed at affecting a public decision, in the design or application of a policy, or in the drafting, modification, or approval of a regulation.

The regulation applies regardless of the medium used. It may involve an in-person meeting, a phone call, a video conference, an email, the sending of a document, or a communication made through another person.

The state sphere includes high-ranking officials, members of cabinets, managerial and temporary staff, public employees with a decisive participation in decisions, policies or regulations, and members of advisory bodies and consultants of the General Administration of the State.

What is the difference between direct and indirect influence?

Direct influence occurs when the interest group or a person representing it contacts the public official directly.

Indirect influence relies on intermediary persons to convey the group's positioning to the official or public employee that one wishes to influence.

The Lobby Law subjects both modalities to the same requirements. Using a consultancy, association, office, or another intermediary entity does not exclude the action from the scope of the regulation.

What can be considered influence activities?

The Transparency Council provides several examples:

  • Organizing meetings, conferences, training courses, or other events to which a public official is invited as a participant or speaker with the aim of influencing.
  • Proposing the holding of consultations, hearings, or other similar public initiatives.
  • Promoting communication campaigns, platforms, networks, or initiatives aimed at public officials.
  • Delivering position documents, amendment proposals, reports, or other materials related to public decisions or initiatives.
  • Using third parties to convey positions, including the funding of associations, think tanks, or other entities to influence public or regulatory debate.

All these actions generally require a prior registration when they aim to influence the public officials included in the regulation.

What actions are not considered influence activities?

The regulation excludes a series of activities that, therefore, can continue to be carried out without their participants having to register as an interest group for that sole reason:

  • The execution of public functions or the provision of public services by private entities when they are legally assigned.
  • The intervention in public participation procedures regulated by a norm, such as certain procedures for public hearing or information.
  • The participation in collegiate consultative bodies created and regulated legally or by regulation.
  • The legal or professional advice directly related to the defense of interests in an administrative procedure.
  • The actions of conciliation, mediation, and arbitration carried out in accordance with their specific regulations.
  • The exercise of constitutional rights, such as those of manifestation, assembly, and petition.
  • The merely protocol acts.
  • The submission of documentation and allegations, the filing of appeals or other actions carried out by an interested person within an administrative procedure.

The exclusion depends on the specific nature of the action. For example, participating in a formal procedure for public information is not considered an influencing activity, but later holding a meeting outside of that procedure to try to modify a norm may be subject to registration.

 

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What is the current status of the parliamentary processing of the Lobby Law and what steps remain pending for its full implementation?

Under the label of the “Lobby Law”, two key pieces coexist today: the Bill on transparency and integrity of interest group activities (being processed in Congress, exp. 121/000046) and the new Royal Decree-Law 21/2026, of August 25, on transparency and integrity of interest group activities, already published in the BOE and in force. Both respond to the same lobby regulation agenda, but are at different stages.

1. Status of the bill in Congress

The Bill on transparency and integrity of interest group activities, promoted by the Ministry for Digital Transformation and Public Function, was approved by the Council of Ministers in January 2025 and sent to Congress shortly thereafter. According to the reconstructed processing:

  • 01/30/2025: registration of the bill in Congress.
  • 02/07/2025: qualification and admission for processing.
  • The amendment period opens; this period is repeatedly extended (up to 17 times according to the press) until its definitive closure on 09/10/2025.
  • 03/18/2025: total amendments are published; Vox requests the return of the bill. The Plenary rejects that amendment (32 yes, 177 no, 136 abstentions), so the text remains alive.
  • In autumn 2025, the committee is constituted in the competent commission and work on the amendments begins.
  • 09/17/2025: the Plenary approves the referral to Plenary (340 yes, 0 no, 6 abstentions), that is, it decides that the final vote on the committee report will not be resolved in the committee with full legislative competence, but in the Plenary of Congress.
  • 09/22/2025: publication of the amendments to the articles.
  • 09/25/2025: publication of the confirmation of the referral to Plenary.

Parliamentary information and Demócrata news agree that, despite these advances, the bill has not yet been approved by the Plenary of Congress nor sent to the Senate. The European Commission, in its Rule of Law report, explicitly states that the bill “has not yet been approved by Parliament” and rates progress on interest groups as limited due to political blockage.

2. Appearance of Royal Decree-Law 21/2026

Faced with this deadlock, the Government has opted for a parallel route: the Royal Decree-Law 21/2026, of August 25, on transparency and integrity of interest group activities, which Moncloa itself and the press describe as the new “lobby law.”

According to the Council of Ministers’ reference, this royal decree-law:

  • Regulates, within the scope of the General State Administration and its institutional public sector, the relationship between interest groups and public officials and personnel susceptible to influence.
  • Defines who is an interest group, what influence activity is, and who can be the object of such influence.
  • Creates a State Register of Interest Groups, public, free, electronic, and with mandatory registration, managed by the Transparency and Good Governance Council, with data accessible through the Transparency Portal.
  • Establishes a sanctioning regime for interest groups (very serious, serious, and minor infractions) and obligations of publication of agendas and contacts for public personnel.
  • Provides for the preparation of a normative footprint that records the influence of lobbies in each regulatory project.
  • Is based on prior parliamentary work: it starts “from the work carried out during the processing of the lobby bill in Congress” and incorporates already negotiated amendments.

The royal decree-law has been in force since its publication in the BOE (08/26/2026), but must be submitted to confirmation or repeal by Congress within a maximum period of 30 days.

3. What steps remain for “full application”

As of today, the situation can be summarized as follows:

  • The Bill remains under processing in Congress, in committee phase after the closure of amendments and referral to Plenary. It has not completed:
    • Debate and approval of the committee report.
    • Final debate and vote in the Plenary of Congress.
    • Referral to the Senate, possible amendment phase or veto and, if applicable, return to Congress for veto lifting or acceptance/rejection of amendments.
    • Promulgation, royal sanction, publication as ordinary law, and eventual entry into force (generally after 20 days, unless otherwise specified).
  • The Royal Decree-Law 21/2026:
    • Still requires the confirmation vote in Congress. If confirmed, the state register and the designed regime will remain in force; Congress may also agree to process it as a bill to introduce additional changes.
    • Requires regulatory and operational development (effective launch of the register, IT systems, supervision and sanction procedures) for the regulation to be fully applicable in practice.
  • In parallel, the reform of the Congress Rules on lobbies continues, which regulates the relationship of interest groups with deputies and parliamentary groups and their internal sanctioning regime; this part is necessary to have a complete system within the Cortes.

In summary: the “Lobby Law” as a parliamentary bill remains stalled in Congress and has not completed its processing. However, the basic framework has already been advanced through Royal Decree-Law 21/2026, which is in force but pending confirmation and regulatory and organizational deployment to allow the interest group register and transparency obligations to operate at full capacity.

What are the powers and functions of the Transparency and Good Governance Council according to current legislation?

The Transparency and Good Governance Council (CTBG) is the independent body created by Law 19/2013, on transparency, access to public information, and good governance, in its Title III, to promote transparency, guarantee the right of access, and ensure compliance with good governance rules. It acts with its own legal personality and full autonomy and independence (art. 33).

1. General purpose and regulatory framework

According to art. 33 of Law 19/2013, the CTBG’s purpose is to:

  • Promote transparency of public activity.
  • Monitor compliance with publicity obligations.
  • Safeguard the exercise of the right of access to public information.
  • Guarantee observance of good governance provisions.

Its regime is completed with references made by Law 19/2013 to budgetary, contracting, asset, and administrative procedure legislation, and with its Statute, approved by Royal Decree (which does not alter the core competencies defined in the law).

2. Functions in transparency and access rights

In the field of transparency and access to information, Law 19/2013 assigns the Council and its President, among others, the following functions:

  • Control of active publicity obligations of the General State Administration, verifying compliance with the publicity chapter and being able to issue resolutions ordering cessation of non-compliance and initiation of disciplinary actions (control provision cited in the legal text after modification by Law 14/2022).
  • Adopt recommendations for better compliance with transparency obligations contained in the Law (letter a of the general functions list).
  • Advise on transparency and access to public information (letter b).
  • Evaluate the degree of application of Law 19/2013, by preparing an annual report on compliance with transparency obligations, presented to the General Courts (letter d).
  • Hear claims regarding access to information against express or presumed resolutions of administrations, optionally and prior to administrative litigation (art. 24 and express reference to CTBG competence in its sections 1 and 6).
  • Respond to queries raised by bodies responsible for processing and resolving access requests (specific function of the President).
3. Functions in good governance

Regarding good governance, the CTBG:

  • Monitors observance of good governance provisions contained in Title II of Law 19/2013, directed at Government members and senior officials.
  • Instigates initiation of sanctioning procedures for good governance infractions, under the sanctioning regime of that title, being able to formally request the opening of the file; the competent body must justify its decision if it decides not to open it (function of the President, letter e).

These functions place the CTBG as a central piece of ethical and integrity control of senior officials, in coordination with sanctioning bodies provided in the law itself and other public function regulations.

4. Advisory, interpretative, promotional, and training functions

The Law details a block of more “soft” functions, but decisive to guide administrative practice:

  • Issue mandatory reports on state regulatory projects that develop Law 19/2013 or relate to its object (letter c).
  • Adopt uniform interpretation criteria of the obligations contained in the Law, a function expressly attributed to the President, which guides all transparency management units (letter a of the President’s functions).
  • Promote drafts of recommendations, guidelines, and good practice standards in transparency, access, and good governance (letter e).
  • Promote training and awareness activities to improve knowledge of the regulated matters (letter f).
  • Collaborate with analogous bodies, especially regional ones, and convene at least one annual coordination meeting with them and with local administration (provision on the Transparency and Good Governance Commission).
  • Exercise all other functions assigned by laws or regulations (open clause of letters h of the general list and g of the President’s functions).
5. Control and sanctioning functions

Although the CTBG is not a sanctioning body in the strict sense, the Law grants it a key role of guarantee and activation of the sanctioning regime:

  • Controls compliance with active publicity obligations of the General State Administration and can issue resolutions indicating necessary measures and initiation of disciplinary actions.
  • Resolves access claims (art. 24), acting as the specialized route prior to courts and setting criteria binding on the Administration unless judicially reviewed.
  • Instigates sanctioning procedures for good governance, as noted, reinforcing the deterrent effect of ethical principles in Title II.

The main relevant reform, Law 14/2022, has adjusted some contents of active publicity and references in art. 8, but has not substantially modified the CTBG’s catalogue of competencies: its role as an independent body for supervision, interpretation, control, and promotion of transparency and good governance in the state public sector remains.

What legal requirements are necessary for an interest group to access the register once the form is opened?

The legal requirements for an interest group to access a register, once the registration form is opened, are determined by the specific regulations of each register (state, sectoral, or regional). Although details vary, the analyzed rules —such as Decree-Law 1/2017 of the Catalonia Interest Group Register, Law 25/2018 and Decree 172/2021 of the Valencian Community, and the Resolution of March 9, 2016 on the “CNMC Interest Group Register”— allow identifying a common pattern of requirements.

1. Who is considered an interest group and who can register?

According to these rules, interest groups are natural or legal persons who carry out influence or intermediation activities before public institutions to defend their own or third-party interests. Law 25/2018 of the Valencian Community conceives them as actors seeking to influence public decision-making, defending business, professional, labor, academic, associative, or non-profit interests, among others.

Therefore, the following may register:

  • Companies and business associations.
  • Professional associations and sectoral organizations.
  • Unions, NGOs, citizen platforms, and other civil society entities.
  • Public affairs consultancies, professional firms, and natural persons who perform interest representation activities.

In specific registers (for example, the National Commission on Markets and Competition register, regulated by the Resolution of March 9, 2016, BOE-A-2016-2488), registration is aimed at groups interacting with that specific body.

2. Minimum data and documentation in the form

Based on the CNMC Resolution on the “CNMC Interest Group Register” file and the index of Decree 172/2021 of the Valencian Community (articles on registration request of organizations and representatives), it appears that, at minimum, the form usually requires:

  • Group identification: corporate name or name, tax ID or equivalent document, registered or postal address, phone, email, and, if applicable, website.
  • Representative identification: personal and professional data of the person acting before authorities (name and surname, position or type of representation).
  • Purpose and objectives: description of the group’s general aims and the interests it defends.
  • Specific activities and areas of interest: main influence activities carried out or planned and the sectors or public policies on which it acts.
  • Categories and areas of interest (in the Valencian case, art. 12 of Decree 172/2021): classification of the group into certain typological categories and material areas of action.
  • Acceptance of a code of conduct: express commitment to the ethical and transparency rules established by the regulation (mentioned in art. 11 of Decree 172/2021).

Data is usually provided through electronic forms, as foreseen by the CNMC, and incorporated into a public file whose processing must comply with data protection regulations.

3. Obligations arising from registration

Regional laws and Valencian regulatory development establish a set of obligations, among which stand out:

  • Transparency: making visible the identity of the group and its representatives, as well as the interests it defends, through its public registration.
  • Information update: communicate relevant changes (representatives, contact data, activities, areas of interest), as set out in provisions such as article 10 of Decree 172/2021.
  • Respect for the code of conduct: comply with integrity, behavior, and relationship guidelines with public officials established by interest group legislation.
  • Activity register: in some cases, maintain a record of meetings and influence contacts with the administration (art. 14 of Decree 172/2021) that may be subject to publicity or control.
4. Denial, suspension, or cancellation

Although details are found in chapters on control and sanctioning procedure (Chapter II, Section two, and Chapter V of Decree 172/2021), the general scheme is that registration may:

  • Be denied if minimum required data is not provided or if the applicant does not fit the legal definition of interest group.
  • Be temporarily suspended, according to article 20 of Decree 172/2021, when investigations exist for possible breaches of the code of conduct or registration obligations.
  • Be cancelled when serious falsehood in information, repeated non-compliance with obligations, or imposition of sanctions leading to deregistration is verified.

In short, once the form is opened, access to the register requires the interest group to identify itself completely and truthfully, specify which interests it defends and in which areas, designate its representatives, and accept an ethical and transparency framework; from there, registration entails obligations of updating, traceability of its influence activity, and submission to a control and sanctioning regime that may culminate in suspension or cancellation of registration.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

Since when has the Lobbying Law (Royal Decree-law 21/2026) been in force?

Question 1 of 3

What activities can interest groups carry out without being registered while the registry is not operational?

Question 2 of 3

What obligation must interest groups fulfill when interacting with public officials according to the Lobbying Law?

Question 3 of 3