The new Registry of Interest Groups of the General State Administration still does not allow for the processing of registrations. The Council of Transparency and Good Governance, responsible for managing it, limits itself to announcing that the electronic form will be available "soon" and that its opening will be communicated through official channels.
The delay poses a practical problem. Royal Decree-Law 21/2026, known as the Lobby Law, came into force on August 27 and establishes that registration must occur before carrying out an influence activity.
First problem: the regulation does not include a suspension of this obligation until the form is enabled nor does it establish a specific transitional regime for this period.
The text itself exceptionally admits a first contact with a group not yet registered if its representatives commit in writing to request registration within the next three business days. However, it is also not possible to meet that deadline while the electronic procedure remains closed.
These are the main questions and answers disseminated by the Council of Transparency to delineate who is affected by the regulation, what activities are subject to it, and which can continue to be carried out without registration.
What can lobbies do while the form is not available?
The regulation does not offer an express solution for the period between its entry into force and the effective opening of the registry. There is also no general authorization in the Council's frequently asked questions to carry out influence activities without being registered.
Until the procedure is enabled, groups can carry out actions that the law itself excludes from the concept of influence: participate in regulated public information procedures, submit allegations as interested parties, intervene in regulated advisory bodies, provide legal defense in administrative procedures, or exercise the rights of petition, assembly, and demonstration.
As for meetings or communications that do aim to influence, the only exceptional avenue provided is the commitment to request registration within the next three business days. But its application is problematic while there is no form through which to fulfill that obligation.
And that is a problem. Several ministries have denied meetings to interest groups due to the requirement of being duly registered, despite the fact that as of today it is not possible.
For this reason, groups can prepare in advance the information they must provide, review their internal procedures, identify the personnel who carry out this activity, and keep a record of meetings, communications, and documents. Internal preparation does not equate to being registered nor does it alone enable the maintenance of influence activities.
What obligations must interest groups already comply with?
The entry into force of the regulation subjects groups and those acting on their behalf to principles of conduct. They must identify themselves to the public official, explain the interests they defend, and, when appropriate, indicate whom they represent.
They must also provide accurate information, act transparently and honestly, respect confidentiality, and avoid any actions that may mislead or cause a conflict of interest.
They cannot offer gifts, favors, or advantageous services, exert abusive pressure, obtain information unlawfully, or simultaneously represent conflicting interests without the informed consent of the affected parties.
The regulation also requires keeping data updated, ensuring the publicity of meetings and contacts, informing their own personnel of the new rules, and collaborating with the Transparency Council.
When the system is operational, the information and documents related to an influence activity must be delivered within a maximum of 15 business days. Publicity will be the general rule, although a motivated request for a limitation of access may be made for legally provided reasons, such as data protection, security, or commercial confidentiality.
What is considered an influence activity?
Any direct or indirect communication with public personnel or officials aimed at affecting a public decision, in the design or application of a policy, or in the drafting, modification, or approval of a regulation.
The regulation applies regardless of the medium used. It may involve an in-person meeting, a phone call, a video conference, an email, the sending of a document, or a communication made through another person.
The state sphere includes high-ranking officials, members of cabinets, managerial and temporary staff, public employees with a decisive participation in decisions, policies or regulations, and members of advisory bodies and consultants of the General Administration of the State.
What is the difference between direct and indirect influence?
Direct influence occurs when the interest group or a person representing it contacts the public official directly.
Indirect influence relies on intermediary persons to convey the group's positioning to the official or public employee that one wishes to influence.
The Lobby Law subjects both modalities to the same requirements. Using a consultancy, association, office, or another intermediary entity does not exclude the action from the scope of the regulation.
What can be considered influence activities?
The Transparency Council provides several examples:
- Organizing meetings, conferences, training courses, or other events to which a public official is invited as a participant or speaker with the aim of influencing.
- Proposing the holding of consultations, hearings, or other similar public initiatives.
- Promoting communication campaigns, platforms, networks, or initiatives aimed at public officials.
- Delivering position documents, amendment proposals, reports, or other materials related to public decisions or initiatives.
- Using third parties to convey positions, including the funding of associations, think tanks, or other entities to influence public or regulatory debate.
All these actions generally require a prior registration when they aim to influence the public officials included in the regulation.
What actions are not considered influence activities?
The regulation excludes a series of activities that, therefore, can continue to be carried out without their participants having to register as an interest group for that sole reason:
- The execution of public functions or the provision of public services by private entities when they are legally assigned.
- The intervention in public participation procedures regulated by a norm, such as certain procedures for public hearing or information.
- The participation in collegiate consultative bodies created and regulated legally or by regulation.
- The legal or professional advice directly related to the defense of interests in an administrative procedure.
- The actions of conciliation, mediation, and arbitration carried out in accordance with their specific regulations.
- The exercise of constitutional rights, such as those of manifestation, assembly, and petition.
- The merely protocol acts.
- The submission of documentation and allegations, the filing of appeals or other actions carried out by an interested person within an administrative procedure.
The exclusion depends on the specific nature of the action. For example, participating in a formal procedure for public information is not considered an influencing activity, but later holding a meeting outside of that procedure to try to modify a norm may be subject to registration.