García Brustenga: "We are doing a large part of the Industry Law without the law"

The Secretary of State for Industry exclusively addresses with DEMÓCRATA the problems of access to the electrical grid, the future of the PERTE, the debate of "Made in Europe," and the opportunities to attract new investments to Spain.

11 minutes

DSC05327

DSC05327

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

11 minutes

Most read

Last week, Santander became the meeting point of the Spanish technology industry. The 40th edition of the AMETIC Digital Economy and Telecommunications Meeting brought together representatives from the Government and the business fabric to discuss competitiveness, artificial intelligence, strategic autonomy, and the industrial future of the country. In that scenario, the Secretary of State for Industry, Jordi García Brustenga, attended exclusively for DEMÓCRATA to address some of the main challenges facing the sector.

From the future of Spanish automotive and the competition from countries with lower costs to access to the electrical grid, the continuity of the PERTE or the protection of European production. García Brustenga also addressed the parliamentary blockage of the Industry and Strategic Autonomy Law, a regulation that the Government keeps among its priorities for what remains of the legislature, and anticipated some of the steps that Industry intends to take while its processing continues.

Q- We are at a moment of reorganization of supply chains and a bet on sovereignty, which industries would be interesting to bring back to Spain or to establish here for the first time?

A- Well, it is a very appropriate moment. If we were playing cards, we could say that we have drawn very good ones in some sectors. I would mention the automotive sector because it is very visible, but also pharmaceuticals, perfumery, and chemicals. Or capital goods, renewables, and the defense, space, and chip sectors... It is seen in macroeconomic indicators, we are growing above France, Germany, and Europe, and recurrently for years. There is a will to make ourselves visible as a motor of Europe, so that they no longer tell us that we are the pigs.

P- You mentioned the word opportunity, what do you think are those values that make Spain a safe bet for the future?

R- For example, the energy transition. It is a matter that started with an almost specifically environmental sustainability will, but we have been seeing that it gives us strategic autonomy and competitiveness. The new economy, the new product, and the new process are green. All the work we have done, sometimes with effort and losing short-term opportunities, we are now seeing how it bears fruit.

Or the digital transition. We are here at the 40th meeting of AMETIC, where the sector has been pushing hard for years. Not only do we have good cards, but we are also very adaptable, perhaps because we have been thinking for years about how we can reduce this gap with other powers. From April 5 to 8 we will be at the Hannover Messe demonstrating this prowess, from the humility of knowing that other people do some things better, but with the pride that we also have nothing to envy.

P- Spain is a world power in automobile manufacturing, but the transition to electric vehicles is modifying the entire chain. Is it guaranteed that Spain will continue to be one of the major manufacturers in ten years?

R- Totally. The Government, the private sector, and the autonomous communities saw clearly that the car of the future will be green. And while other countries have slowed down, we have all gone together in this direction. This has led us to the following reality: the five major car manufacturing groups have taken the step to electric or connected vehicles. All five are investing in their factories to manufacture new models, and Spain is becoming a reference within their international groups.

Moreover, five of the most important Chinese manufacturers have entered, who have the most advanced technology, and together with Spanish and European companies are making these transformations. Therefore, we have the five transformed groups, plus five Chinese ones and the recovery of two Spanish brands that were latent, Ebro and Santana.

Now we are 'under construction', in the factories, but in the coming years we will see how we increase production and perhaps even become the top producers in Europe.

The Auto 2030 program has been important and this summer the Autoclus has been released, which is the aid for the purchase of electric vehicles, and it is going very well. It has been a month and it is being important because demand drives supply. If the investor sees that the local market buys electric vehicles, they are encouraged to continue investing in that direction. Therefore, if we do our job well in the next two or three years, it can be a sector that is also a reference for the rest of the industrial sectors.

P- Spain competes with countries like Morocco or India, where labor costs are lower, not only for production but for design, R&D+i... What can be done to prevent those activities from leaving Spain? Are more incentives needed or also some kind of penalty?

The question is how we produce in Europe and in Spain, how we continue to have employment and the capacity to make cars or whatever, vaccines, fertilizers, or steel, without losing competitiveness. We gain competitiveness through open and global economic work, which has gone very well for all countries. Therefore, it is about maintaining relationships with other parts of the world, some more competitive in terms of costs and, sometimes, not only that, but also better in technological quality, while at the same time maintaining this safeguard of the Spanish and European industry.

We are working in Europe on the first European industrial policy law to regulate the industry under the umbrella of the Industrial Acceleration Act. There we are defining a concept that is "Made in Europe," and that is a way to protect what is made here. No one will be able to receive aid or access public procurement if it is not made in Europe.

What does Europe mean? We are seeing how to make it flexible to maintain these global chains and, at the same time, retain as much production as possible in Europe and Spain. It is not easy because we want to remain open, but on the other hand, not be the only fools who do not close a little.

P- Is our network prepared for all the investments that have been announced in recent months, and the projects that are planned for the coming years?

R- It is clear that energy is becoming more and more critical as a factor of competitiveness. Good work has been done in the generation of renewable energies, and the crisis in Iran has shown us that we are more prepared, but that does not mean that access is guaranteed and that it is a price that is competitive. The latest royal decrees go in this direction, like Iran, and what is coming now, investment ceilings, planning of the transport network, too.

If we take too long to provide electrical access, the investment will go to another country

And on the other hand, we as an industry have a separate chapter which is the electro-intensive sector, the large basic industries of steel, aluminum, ceramics, cement, chemicals... They are the large consumers and cost more to decarbonize. A lot of investment has already been made with the decarbonization PERTE, but this change needs to be completed, it is our pending chapter.

P- ¿And does it confirm if there are industrial investments that are currently waiting due to lack of electrical capacity?

R- Yes, we are aware. In all of Spain, there is not a single autonomous community that does not have some new or improvement project that requires an increase in capacity. But this is not something that can be achieved overnight. It needs to be planned and we need to be more agile when it comes to providing access from another ministry.

This also coincides with a small speculative bubble of some who, whenever there is a sector change, come in to see if they can make a profit. We need to discern between the real, industrial project, for example, a data center, and one that is buying to be able to sell access at a higher price.

On one hand, there is that work and, on the other, the agility so that investment is not lost, because if we take a little too long it will go to another country. Therefore, that is what we are working on and, although it is not our ministry, we are very present in the decisions regarding access and price.

Jordi García Brustenga attending to DEMÓCRATA
Jordi García Brustenga attending to DEMÓCRATA -

P- Last week, the deadline for the execution of the European Next Generation funds concluded, what assessment does the Government make of the industrial PERTEs and how will the investment momentum be maintained now?

R- As I was saying, we are 'under construction'. If you go through the Spanish industries, you will see that they are investing, finishing projects, and starting those that go through the State Society for Industrial Promotion and Business Development (SEPIDES). And when you are under construction, well, there are more inconveniences than benefits, but in a few years we will see the fruits of that. We will see how industrial productive capacity has increased, the products, and also the industrial GDP. Right now, we can say what has been done, but not the result.

At the same time, with the PERTEs there has been a learning process. At first, it was a very collective model, difficult to manage and justify. Now it is more individual and bureaucracy has also been reduced to make it agile. We have a perfected instrument.

On the other hand, the PERTE for Electric and Connected Vehicles (VEC), with 3 billion, and the PERTE for Industrial Decarbonization, with more than 1 billion, have perhaps been the two most successful and visible. We want that, with national budget and hopefully also with more European budget, we can continue in those sectors that need this transformation.

P- Another of the pillars that is marking this AMETIC Congress is the process of digitalization of the industrial fabric, do you think there is a risk of creating a very advanced technological industry while a significant part of SMEs is left behind?

R- I am not so worried about the adoption of AI, but about how you change the business model. This needs support and we agree with the private sector, with CEOE and Cepyme. We are at 17.5% of industrial companies that use AI, while globally 21% of SMEs use it. Therefore, there is a gap in support.

We intend to continue with instruments such as Innovative Business Groups (AEI), the European Digital Innovation Hubs (EDIH), and the National Innovation Company (Enisa), to support this real transformation of the business model with AI.

We know that it is a very difficult Congress and that not everything is in my hands or in the minister's

P - What is the status of the Industry and Strategic Autonomy Law?

It is in the process of approval by Congress. The regulation encompasses two major milestones: the investment that accompanies private funds, partly thanks to European funds that, although not finished, have allowed for significant progress, and on the other hand, the institutionalization of this industrial policy. The current law is from 1992, it needs to be updated, to set the new playing field, with instruments like the PERTE. There are many things we are already doing, but without having them institutionalized. We intend for the legislature to end with the approval of the law.

We know that it is a very difficult Congress and that not everything is in my hands or in the minister's, it is true, but let it not be because of us that we do not achieve it. I do not understand how something that is for the country and on which there is agreement is not approved. We are open to negotiating in all directions to make it comfortable for the majority.

P- And what is currently holding it back?

I believe that more than the text, which we are open to discussing, it is the political context that exists. We are looking for a window of opportunity that makes common sense prevail in the decision and in the vote for the approval of such a transversal and infrastructural law.

P- The Lobby Law was also blocked and has been approved via royal decree-law, are you considering this possibility as a last resort before the legislature ends?

It could be, but a royal decree law, in the end, also has to be validated. I believe that this is important enough and has the weight of basic state regulation, to change it from a law to a royal decree law. It has to be a law. That is our feeling, we must be brave and approve it in the form of a law.

P- And aside from this law, are you working on any regulation perhaps more sectorial that could see the light?

R - Well, we are working on the improvement of the Electrointensive Statute. The call has already been issued and next year it will be improved, expanding the sectors it affects. And regarding the compensation of CO2 for indirect costs, there have also been regulatory changes. We are regulating the creation of small bodies that are provided for in the law, such as the improvement of the high-level industry forum or the interministerial group on industrial policy, necessary to work on issues like energy, talent, digitalization...

In regulation, it is possible to advance more quickly with royal decrees or ministerial bodies. But the law would be the pillar that would institutionalize and make everything more formal.

The industrial transformation and the enhancement of industrial policy are in process and must be completed

P - Is there any urgent aspect that is being affected by the paralysis of this law?

Well, in fact, we are doing a large part of the law without the law. An Strategic Investments Committee has been created, which is led by the Office of Economic Affairs and will come out now in autumn, and which was planned in the project approved by the Council of Ministers.

There are things that we are advancing, such as the State Registry of Interested Entities in Strategic Projects for Economic Recovery and Transformation (RECAPI) and the Working Group on Strategic Autonomy. We are also working with the Spanish Association for Standardization (UNE) in a working group to create a standard that standardizes the contribution of critical companies to strategic autonomy. If the law were approved, it would start from many things already begun, and this is also an advantage.

P- To finish, we are starting the political course. How do you face it? What priorities or what is the agenda of the Secretariat?

R- The main thing is that this is not over. The industrial transformation and the enhancement of industrial policy are in process and must be completed. There is a project for four or five more years within the six-year strategy we are designing. This is a path, and on the other hand, there is the focus on it.

The Strategic Investments Committee will come out now in autumn

This course we will surely have noise, both at the national and European and global levels. But what we want is focus, with those who want to follow us. We know of autonomous communities and municipalities that want to advance in their investment projects or in their sectoral competitiveness. Also from groups of companies, employers' associations, and unions... We cannot control the noise, but we can control where we put the focus.

In detail

We met with the Secretary of State for Industry, Jordi García Brustenga, at the "little house" of Red.es. It is not Bad Bunny's, but for days it has been the center of attention at the Palace of Magdalena. High-ranking government officials and very prominent figures from the private sector have passed through the official press quarters over three days.

After the interview, Brustenga was awaited by a crowd of media who were waiting under the sun of Santander. The unstable climate of the Cantabrian Sea gave a break and the 40th Congress of AMETIC took place without rain. An unusual milestone in the four decades that have marked the beginning of the new school year.

 

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What is the current parliamentary status of the Industry and Strategic Autonomy Law and what are the next steps for its approval?

The so-called Industry and Strategic Autonomy Law is currently in the Congress of Deputies, at an early stage of the parliamentary process: the bill remains in the phase of amendments to the articles in Committee, with the deadline for submitting amendments repeatedly extended until September 9, 2026. There have been no votes yet either in Committee or in Plenary, nor has it passed to the Senate.

In technical terms, the initiative identified is the Industry and Strategic Autonomy Bill, with parliamentary file number 121/000043, submitted by the Government and published in the Official Bulletin of the General Courts (Series A, no. 43-1) on December 20, 2024. The Board of the Congress agreed to entrust it, with full legislative competence, to the Industry and Tourism Committee, initially opening a fifteen working day amendment period, which ended on February 11, 2025.

Since then, according to the registered procedure, that amendment period:

  • Has been successively extended, accumulating 59 extensions of the deadline.
  • The latest extension extends the deadline for submitting amendments until September 9, 2026.
  • In parallel, at least two debates have been held in the Industry and Tourism Committee (February and March 2025), both without votes, that is, without a report from the working group or a committee opinion having been approved yet.
  • The parliamentary voting database shows 0 votes associated with file 121/000043, confirming that neither the Committee (with full legislative competence) nor the Plenary of the Congress have put the text to a vote.

This situation has been repeatedly described in the press — including the newspaper Demócrata — as a blockage or “entrenchment” of the bill: the amendment period has been open since February 2025 and is systematically extended, preventing the bill from advancing to the deliberative and voting phases.

From this procedural point, and provided the process is reactivated, the next formal steps necessary for its approval would be, in summary, the following:

1. Closing the amendment period and work in Committee
  • Closing the amendment period in the Industry and Tourism Committee. While the period remains open, the working group phase cannot start ordinarily.
  • Appointment of the working group, responsible for studying the Government's text along with the parliamentary groups' amendments.
  • Preparation of the working group's report, which will incorporate or reject amendments, and its subsequent submission to the Committee.
  • Approval of the opinion by the Industry and Tourism Committee. Since the Committee has full legislative competence, it could in principle approve the final text without the need to pass it to the Plenary, unless avocation is agreed.
2. Possible avocation to the Plenary of the Congress

Although the initial assignment is with full legislative competence, parliamentary groups may request avocation to the Plenary. If the Plenary of the Congress agreed to avocate the bill, the following would occur:

  • Debate and vote on the text (and on the amendments that remain active) in the Plenary of the Congress.
  • Approval in Plenary would require the ordinary majorities provided for ordinary laws.
3. Procedure in the Senate

Whether approval occurs in Committee with full legislative competence or in Plenary, the next block of steps is the referral of the text to the Senate:

  • Reception and classification of the bill by the Board of the Senate.
  • Amendment period and processing in the corresponding Senate committee.
  • Possible partial amendments or a veto to the entire text.
  • Vote in the Senate Plenary, which may:
    • Approve the bill without changes (in which case the text would be ready for promulgation), or
    • Approve amendments or a veto, which would require a new pronouncement by the Congress.
4. Final approval and publication

If the Senate does not introduce changes, or if the Congress lifts the possible veto or decides on the Senate's amendments, the text would be ready for its final phase:

  • Final approval by the General Courts (after resolving any discrepancies between Chambers).
  • Promulgation by the King.
  • Publication in the Official State Gazette (BOE), from which point the Industry and Strategic Autonomy Law would come into force in the manner and terms determined by its final provision.

As of the date of your question, the entire process described from the closing of the amendment period onward has not yet begun: the law formally remains in the Congress, in the phase of amendments to the articles, with the base text published but without a report, without votes, and without referral to the Senate.

What are the powers and functions of the Secretary of State for Industry according to Spanish legislation?

The Secretary of State for Industry is the senior official who, under the authority of the Minister of Industry (currently Ministry of Industry and Tourism), directs the Government's industrial policy and the set of bodies dependent on the Secretariat of State. His position and functions are detailed in the royal decrees of basic organic structure of ministerial departments and of the ministry competent in industrial matters.

1. General institutional role

From a legal-administrative point of view, the Secretary of State is:

  • The highest political-administrative official in the industrial area within the ministry, immediately below the minister.
  • Senior management body that exercises leadership over the directorates-general and units attached to the Secretariat of State (for example, the directorates-general of industry, small and medium enterprises, support for industrial competitiveness, etc., according to the structure in force at any given time).
  • Responsible for strategic planning of the area: sets priorities, approves plans and programs, and supervises their execution.
  • Ordinary representative of the ministry in its material scope before other ministries, autonomous communities, European institutions, and international organizations related to industry.
2. Management and coordination functions

The organic structure regulations assign the Secretary of State for Industry a set of internal management powers, among which stand out:

  • Directing and coordinating the actions of all dependent directorates-general and units, ensuring coherence with the lines set by the minister and the Government.
  • Distributing objectives and resources among the different bodies of the department in industrial matters, as well as monitoring their compliance.
  • Promoting administrative modernization in its scope (digitalization of procedures, electronic administration, regulatory improvement) according to the ministry's general guidelines.
  • Submitting proposals to the minister on internal organization, creation or modification of bodies, and sectoral action programs.
3. Competences in industrial policy and SMEs

On the material level, the Secretariat of State for Industry is conceived as the core of the design and application of the country's industrial policy. Among its typical functions, the organic regulations provide for:

  • Developing and proposing to the minister the general industrial policy, reindustrialization plans, and strategies to support the competitiveness of the manufacturing industry.
  • Designing and managing support programs for industrial small and medium enterprises (SMEs), including financing instruments, subsidies, and advisory and training tools.
  • Promoting industrial innovation and digitalization, in coordination with other departments competent in digital transformation, science, and technology.
  • Driving sustainability and decarbonization of industry, in coordination with the bodies responsible for energy and ecological transition, through specific programs, aid lines, and technical regulatory frameworks.
4. Management of funds, aids, and dependent bodies

Another major area of competence relates to economic resources and linked entities:

  • Proposing and executing the budget of industrial expenditure programs, as well as the distribution of credits among aid lines, calls, and strategic projects.
  • Approving or submitting for approval regulatory bases and calls for subsidies and public aids for industry, reindustrialization, industrial energy efficiency, or SME digitalization.
  • Exercising oversight and coordination over public bodies and entities attached to the industrial area (agencies, technology centers, or other entities assigned by the organic royal decree to the Secretariat of State), setting objectives and supervising their compliance.
  • Being accountable for the proper management of national and European funds related to industrial policy, especially those linked to recovery plans or community programs.
5. International relations and with the European Union

The structure regulations usually also assign the Secretary of State for Industry a relevant role abroad:

  • Coordinating the Spanish position in European Union forums and international organizations related to industrial policy, competitiveness, industrial standards, and SME policy.
  • Participating in negotiations of European initiatives, programs, and regulatory frameworks affecting Spanish industry, in coordination with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other departments.
  • Promoting the external projection of Spanish industry through industrial cooperation actions, participation in international programs, and collaboration with multilateral organizations.
6. Normative and political representation functions

Finally, as a senior Government official in industrial matters, the Secretary of State exercises relevant functions in the normative and political sphere:

  • Directing the technical preparation of bills, royal decrees, and ministerial orders on industrial regulation, industrial safety, metrology, technical standardization, and other related areas.
  • Informing and submitting for consultation regulatory proposals and industrial plans before autonomous communities, business organizations, unions, and other economic and social agents.
  • Representing the minister ordinarily in interministerial commissions, cooperation bodies with autonomous communities, and parliamentary appearances when so entrusted.

Overall, Spanish legislation configures the Secretary of State for Industry as the comprehensive official responsible for designing, coordinating, and executing the Government's industrial policy, with a strong component of program and fund management, dialogue with the business fabric, and representation of the State in the European and international sphere.

What requirements must industrial projects meet to access the aids associated with the 'Made in Europe' label within the framework of European industrial policy?

The “Made in Europe / Made in EU” label or preference is not yet an isolated aid program with a closed regulation, but the axis of the new Industrial Acceleration Act (IAA) and the Clean Industrial Pact. In practice, it functions as a priority access criterion to public procurement and public aid schemes for certain industrial projects.

Based on the European Commission's proposal of March 4, 2026 (note in Spanish, official statement), projects aspiring to benefit from aids associated with the “Made in Europe” approach must, essentially, meet four major blocks of requirements:

1. Sectoral and technological fit

The IAA first sets a playing field: the “Made in EU” and low-emission preferences focus on strategic sectors:

  • Energy-intensive industries: steel, cement, aluminum (and, possibly extended, other chemicals and basic metals).
  • Automotive value chain, with emphasis on electric vehicles and their components.
  • Net zero technologies: batteries, photovoltaic solar energy, wind, heat pumps, and nuclear.

Therefore, a project must:

  • Operate in one of these sectors or in aligned zero-emission technologies.
  • Clearly contribute to increasing European production capacity in that area (new plants, expansions, new production lines, etc.).
2. European origin and added value in the EU

The core of the label is that the project generates value on European territory, not just symbolic final assembly. The Commission proposes:

  • Introducing specific “Made in the EU” requirements in public procurement and state aid.
  • Linking aids to thresholds of European content (for example, part of the value of components of an electric vehicle or certain battery and solar panel modules).
  • Allowing certain “trusted” countries, with free trade or customs union agreements and reciprocal market opening obligations, to be treated as equivalent to EU origin in some schemes.

In practice, a project wishing to benefit from the “Made in Europe” preferences must demonstrate:

  • That it locates relevant production in one or more Member States (not just a commercial center or a light subsidiary).
  • That a significant part of the added value, technology, or intellectual property is generated or retained in the EU.
  • That its supply chains contribute to European resilience (avoiding extreme dependencies on a single third country).
3. Decarbonization and environmental performance

The label is linked to the Clean Industrial Pact: it is not enough to produce in Europe, production must be with low carbon emissions. Therefore, the IAA:

  • Introduces combined preferences: “Made in EU” + low carbon in tenders and public support systems.
  • Connects with other EU instruments (ecodesign regulation, energy labeling, digital product passport), which require information on carbon footprint and environmental performance.

Regarding aids, industrial projects must prove:

  • That their technology or process entails a measurable reduction of emissions compared to the sector reference.
  • That they are compatible with the path to climate neutrality and with applicable ecodesign and circularity technical criteria.
4. Conditions for large investments from third countries

There is a specific chapter for foreign investments exceeding 100 million euros in strategic sectors when a single third country accumulates more than 40% of the global production capacity. To access the benefits of the European framework (including the “Made in Europe” priority), these projects must:

  • Create quality employment in the EU, with at least 50% European staff.
  • Provide technology and knowledge transfer to the European ecosystem, not just capital.
  • Meet local content requirements in investments, purchases, and subcontracting.
  • Integrate into European industrial supply chains, strengthening their resilience.
5. Procedural framework and single window

Besides substantive criteria, the IAA requires Member States to establish a digital single window to process manufacturing project permits. For the promoter, this implies:

  • Channeling the entire file through unified digital channels.
  • Adhering to simplified deadlines and procedures, designed to accelerate decarbonization and clean manufacturing projects.

In short, “Made in Europe” functions as a filter directing aids and public procurement towards projects that produce in Europe, generate added value and European employment, reduce emissions, and strengthen industrial autonomy. The fine details (specific percentages by sector, European content thresholds, etc.) are being finalized in negotiations in Parliament and the Council, but the core requirements are already clear in the Industrial Acceleration Act proposal and the Clean Industrial Pact.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What event brought together representatives from the Government and the technology sector to discuss the industrial future of Spain?

Question 1 of 3

According to García Brustenga, what are some of the sectors that Spain should promote or attract for its industrial development?

Question 2 of 3

What European measure did García Brustenga mention as key to protecting industrial production within the continent?

Question 3 of 3