Are earthquakes increasing? What do the data say and what real risk exists in Spain

The earthquake of magnitude 4.8 registered this Tuesday in Granada adds to a seismic sequence that keeps attention on these phenomena. The historical records, however, do not allow us to conclude that large earthquakes are increasing on the planet.

4 minutes

EuropaPress 7719423 imagenes destrozos causado terremoto 18 agosto 2026 granada andalucia

EuropaPress 7719423 imagenes destrozos causado terremoto 18 agosto 2026 granada andalucia

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

4 minutes

Most read

The 4.8 magnitude earthquake recorded this Tuesday in Granada, later accompanied by several lower intensity movements, has prolonged the seismic activity that has been affecting the Granada metropolitan area for days. The tremor, located by the National Geographic Institute (IGN) northwest of Gójar, occurred at 10:37 hours and reached a maximum intensity of V-VI.

This has not been an isolated episode. On August 15, numerous movements had already been recorded in the same area, and on the 14th another earthquake also reached a magnitude of 4.8 near Alhendín.

The succession raises a question that also arises when major earthquakes coincide in different countries: Are more earthquakes occurring than before?

Are there now more earthquakes than a few decades ago?

The United States Geological Survey (USGS) estimates that, since the beginning of the 20th century, the global average is around 16 large magnitude earthquakes each year: approximately 15 of magnitude 7 and one of magnitude 8 or higher.

This figure changes considerably from year to year. In 2010, for example, 23 earthquakes of magnitude 7 or higher were recorded, while in 1989 there were only six. The fact that several large earthquakes concentrate in a few months does not imply, therefore, that there is an increasing trend.

The USGS itself also points out that its systems currently locate about 20,000 earthquakes per year worldwide, around 55 daily. Part of the perception that more are occurring now is related to a much greater detection capability and the speed with which information reaches the population.

Can earthquakes occurring in different countries be related?

That two earthquakes occur within a few hours or days of each other does not automatically mean that there is a connection between them.

Earthquakes originate when the energy accumulated in a fault is released suddenly. This rupture can modify the stresses of nearby areas and cause aftershocks or new nearby movements, but this physical relationship cannot simply be transferred to earthquakes separated by hundreds or thousands of kilometers.

Therefore, the temporal coincidence of large earthquakes in different regions of the planet does not prove that they are part of the same global sequence.

In the case of Granada, the IGN reflects a clear concentration of movements in a very nearby area, with numerous episodes recorded around Gójar, Ogíjares, Armilla, Alhendín, or La Zubia during the last days.

Can an earthquake be predicted?

Currently, it is not possible to know precisely when, where, and with what magnitude an earthquake will occur.

The USGS points out that no scientific institution today has a method capable of making that type of prediction. What can be done is to calculate long-term probabilities and develop hazard maps based on known faults and the seismic history of a particular region.

This allows for the identification of more exposed territories and the preparation of preventive measures, but not to anticipate that a specific earthquake will occur on a certain day.

Early warning systems also do not predict earthquakes. They detect the movement once it has begun and, under certain circumstances, can provide a few seconds of margin before the most intense waves reach areas far from the epicenter.

What seismic risk does Spain have?

Spain is officially considered a country of moderate seismic activity, although certain areas have experienced significant earthquakes throughout history. This is noted in the State Civil Protection Plan against Seismic Risk.

Activity is particularly concentrated in the south and southeast of the peninsula, a circumstance linked to the contact between the African and Eurasian plates.

Granada is precisely part of one of the Spanish areas with the highest activity. The IGN catalog, which gathers earthquakes from the year 1370 to the present, records numerous historical episodes in the province.

Among them is the earthquake of Arenas del Rey in 1884, one of the most destructive recorded in Spain, in addition to numerous historical movements in the Granada area.

The damage does not solely depend on the magnitude

A higher magnitude earthquake does not necessarily have to cause more damage than another slightly lower one.

The consequences also depend on the depth of the focus, the distance to populated areas, the type of soil, the vulnerability of buildings, and the population density.

The magnitude measures the energy released by the earthquake, while the intensity describes its effects in a specific place. Therefore, the same earthquake can be felt very differently in two municipalities located at different distances from the epicenter.

In the earthquake of this Tuesday, the IGN has set a maximum intensity of V-VI, within the scale used to measure the perceived effects and possible damages.

Spain has a specific state plan for major earthquakes

The State has had a State Civil Protection Plan against Seismic Risk since 2010, whose objective is to coordinate public resources when an earthquake may cause an emergency of special severity.

The plan includes seismic information systems, coordination between administrations, mobilization of resources, and support mechanisms for the autonomous communities. It also establishes that the National Seismic Network of the IGN is responsible for observing and calculating the main parameters of earthquakes.

The regulations recognize that the probability of an earthquake with catastrophic consequences in Spain is relatively low, but warn that, if it were to occur, the damages could be significant in human lives, infrastructure, and essential services.

The earthquake in Granada does not demonstrate, therefore, that the planet is going through an exceptional stage. It does remind that Spain is a seismically active territory and that certain areas, especially eastern Andalusia and the southeastern peninsula, concentrate a good part of the risk.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What are the main procedures and requirements for activating the State Civil Protection Plan against Seismic Risk in Spain?

The activation of the State Civil Protection Plan against Seismic Risk is mainly regulated by the Resolution of March 29, 2010, which publishes the Agreement of the Council of Ministers of March 26, 2010 approving the Plan, within the framework of the general civil protection regulations (today, mainly the Law 17/2015, of July 9, of the National Civil Protection System, and the Basic Civil Protection Standard). The Plan develops the Basic Civil Protection Guideline against Seismic Risk (Agreement of the Council of Ministers of April 7, 1995, amended in 2004).

1. Information, monitoring, and pre-alert phase
  • The procedure begins with the detection of the seismic phenomenon by the National Geographic Institute (IGN), responsible for the National Seismic Network. The IGN calculates the earthquake parameters (magnitude, location, depth, etc.).
  • The IGN issues a seismic alert when the event may affect the national territory (for example, magnitude ≥ 3 or earthquake felt by the population) and immediately sends it to the General Directorate of Civil Protection and Emergencies (DGPCE).
  • The DGPCE disseminates the information to the bodies of the National Civil Protection System: organizations represented in the State Coordination Committee, Military Emergency Unit (UME), Government Delegations/Subdelegations, and regional civil protection bodies. This phase forms the basis for deciding whether to raise the response level.
2. Evaluation and "ordinary" activation phase of the State Plan
  • Based on seismic data and damage information, the DGPCE carries out a preliminary assessment of effects on people and property (number of victims, damaged infrastructures, affected essential services, extent of the impacted area, etc.).
  • The Plan establishes emergency situations or levels (for example, Situations 1 and 2) depending on:
    • Degree of damage and victims.
    • Territorial extent affected.
    • Need to mobilize means and resources located outside the initially affected area.
  • In these situations, operational leadership falls on the Autonomous Communities' Plans and, within them, on the local action plans. The State Plan is activated:
    • As a support framework to the regional plans when they request state resources or lack sufficient response capacity.
    • As an instrument for coordinating state resources made available to the affected community.
  • Activation is formalized through a decision by the DGPCE and the Ministry of the Interior, documented internally and communicated to the affected Autonomous Communities, Government Delegations, and involved state agencies.
3. Activation due to national interest emergency
  • There is a qualitatively different situation, Situation 3, in which "seismic phenomena have occurred that, due to their severity, are considered to affect national interest".
  • In this case, it is the responsibility of the Minister of the Interior to:
    • Declare the national interest emergency derived from the earthquake, under civil protection legislation.
    • Assume the supreme direction of emergency actions, using the organization provided in the State Plan and the provisions of applicable regional and local plans.
  • The declaration is formalized as a formal act of the Minister of the Interior, which sets the emergency level, territorial scope, and extent of the assumption of state direction. This declaration is immediately communicated to:
    • The governing bodies of the affected Autonomous Communities.
    • The UME and other security and emergency forces and bodies.
    • Other concerned ministerial departments.
4. Direction and coordination bodies activated
  • With the declaration of national interest, the bodies of the State Plan are activated:
    • State Plan Steering Council: the highest support body to the Minister of the Interior. It is chaired by the Minister and includes the Undersecretary, the Director General of Civil Protection and Emergencies, the Chief General of the UME, and representatives of the affected Autonomous Communities. It defines the general strategy, priorities, and resource needs.
    • State Plan Operational Direction: responsible for the operational management of state interventions and coordination with regional and local commands.
    • State Coordination Committee: a technical-operational forum where information from all services (emergencies, security, transport, health, etc.) is integrated and operational decision coherence is ensured.
    • Integrated Operational Coordination Centers (CECOPI) of the plans of the directly affected Autonomous Communities, and the Integrated Operational Command Post at the regional level, which materialize coordination between the State and Autonomous Community on the ground.
  • All these activations are recorded in minutes, operation orders, and official communications issued by the DGPCE and Government Delegations, ensuring traceability of decisions and resource use.
5. End of the emergency
  • The end of the national interest emergency is also declared by the Minister of the Interior, when the causes that motivated the declaration have disappeared. The decision is communicated to the same actors who were notified of the activation.
Could you explain in more detail how the State Plan coordinates with the regional plans and the CECOPI in a specific earthquake? What legal and practical differences exist between a seismic emergency managed only by the autonomous community and one declared of national interest? What specific role do the UME and the Security Forces and Corps play in the activation of the State Plan against seismic risk?

What specific powers and functions does the National Geographic Institute have regarding seismic monitoring according to Spanish legislation?

According to Spanish legislation, the National Geographic Institute (IGN) is the State's reference body for seismic monitoring and observation, with both technical-scientific functions and operational support to civil protection and seismic-resistant regulations.

1. Main regulatory framework
  • Royal Decree 308/2022, which amends Royal Decree 645/2020 and redefines article 17 regarding the Directorate General of the IGN, setting its current functions in geodesy, geophysics, and geophysical monitoring, including seismic (BOE-A-2022-7187).
  • State Civil Protection Plan against Seismic Risk, approved by Agreement of the Council of Ministers and published by Resolution of March 29, 2010 (BOE-A-2010-5661), which develops the Information System on seismic phenomena and the role of the National Seismic Network and the IGN's National Seismic Information Center.
  • Basic Civil Protection Planning Guideline against Seismic Risk, approved in 1995 and amended in 2004 (BOE-A-1995-12364; BOE-A-2004-17005), which relies on seismic hazard maps and data prepared by the IGN and regulates the seismic information system.
  • Royal Decree 401/2020, on the Spanish Commission of Geodesy and Geophysics, which recalls that the IGN is responsible for planning and managing detection and communication systems for seismic movements and volcanic monitoring (BOE-A-2020-4913).
2. Core functions of the IGN in seismic monitoring

a) Planning and management of the network and detection systems

  • Article 17 of Royal Decree 645/2020, as amended by Royal Decree 308/2022, assigns the IGN the coordination of the development, implementation, and monitoring of the National Plan for seismic, volcanological, and other geophysical phenomena monitoring.
  • The same provision assigns it the planning and management of detection and communication systems to institutions for seismic movements occurring in national territory and their possible effects on coasts, as well as work and studies on seismicity and coordination of seismic-resistant regulations.
  • The National Seismic Network depends on it, which, according to the State Seismic Risk Plan, performs observation and calculation of seismic parameters that serve as the basis for official information.

b) Observation, recording, and analysis of earthquakes

  • The State Civil Protection Plan against Seismic Risk defines an Information System on seismic phenomena whose main processes are:
    • Observation and calculation of seismic parameters by the National Seismic Network belonging to the IGN.
    • Determination of the seismic source and preliminary assessment of induced risks.
    • Recognition and preliminary assessment of effects on people and property.
  • The Basic Guideline establishes that for seismic hazard estimation, the seismic hazard maps published by the IGN must be used, in their most updated version, except for more detailed studies commissioned by the autonomous communities.
  • It also foresees a national database on seismic vulnerability, supported by risk analyses incorporated into various civil protection plans, a task in which the IGN's hazard data are essential.

c) Issuance of alerts and dissemination of seismic information

  • The State Seismic Risk Plan regulates the Seismic Alert as the rapid communication, by the National Seismic Network (IGN), of the focal parameters of any earthquake that may have affected the national territory (particularly, magnitude ≥ 3.0 or felt by the population).
  • The minimum content of this alert includes: event identifier, origin date and time, location (latitude, longitude, depth), magnitude, and preliminary estimates of affected area and intensities.
  • The IGN is responsible for the dissemination of this information among the bodies and organizations of the National Civil Protection System and for the coordination of the dissemination process with other concerned bodies, so that emergency response can be activated quickly.
  • The Basic Guideline establishes that the IGN's National Seismic Information Center, together with other seismic networks, constitutes the core of the information system, in coordination with the General Directorate of Civil Protection, Civil Protection Units, and the autonomous communities.

d) Coordination, regulatory support, and international projection

  • The IGN participates in the State Coordination Committee (CECO) provided in the Basic Guideline for planning and reviewing the State Plan and coordinating with regional plans.
  • In the geophysics field, Royal Decree 401/2020 links the IGN with the coordination of research and representation of Spain in international geodesy and geophysics organizations, also relevant for seismic monitoring standards.
  • The explicit reference to the coordination of seismic-resistant regulations places the IGN as a technical support body in the development and updating of seismic-resistant design rules (for example, seismic-resistant construction standards) that incorporate the official seismic hazard determined by the Institute itself.

What results did political parties obtain in the province of Granada in the latest regional and general elections?

Based on the information available in the consulted sources, it is possible to reconstruct with some precision how the distribution of seats by party in the province of Granada was in the latest Andalusian regional elections, and partially in the previous ones. However, those same sources do not provide the detail of votes and percentages by party in Granada nor the provincial result of the latest general elections, so it is not possible to give the exact figures you ask for without directly consulting the official count.

Andalusian regional elections in Granada

Seat distribution after the 2022 regional elections

The clearest data appearing in the reference texts refer to the result of the 2022 regional elections in the province of Granada. An article from Demócrata about the PSOE lists for Granada explicitly recalls that, in those elections, the seat distribution in the constituency was as follows:

  • PP‑A: 6 seats for Granada.
  • PSOE‑A: 4 seats for Granada.
  • Vox: 2 seats for Granada.
  • Por Andalucía: 1 seat for Granada.

In total, they add up to the 13 deputies corresponding to the province in the Andalusian Parliament, something confirmed in another text where it is recalled that Granada elects thirteen regional deputies.

It is reasonable to conclude, therefore, that these were the seat results of the 2022 regional elections in Granada. However, the sources used do not break down how many votes or what percentage of the vote each party obtained in that province; only the seat distribution is cited.

Results of the 2026 regional elections in Granada

In May 2026, new Andalusian elections were held (May 17). Demócrata and other sources describe the overall result and provide pieces on the composition of the Parliament and the deputies of each party, as well as some provincial data. From those texts, the following can be extracted for Granada:

  • An article detailing the 53 PP deputies indicates that the PP obtains 6 deputies for Granada in 2026.
  • Another piece, about the 5 deputies of Por Andalucía, confirms that the coalition achieves 1 seat for Granada.
  • A specific text about the 8 deputies of Adelante Andalucía notes that the formation obtains 1 deputy for Granada.

We also know that the Andalusian Parliament still has 109 deputies and that Granada continues to distribute 13 seats, but in the available fragments it is not specified how the 13 Granada seats are completed among PSOE‑A, Vox, and other forces in 2026. Nor are the exact votes or percentages for each candidacy provided for this province.

In summary, with the consulted sources it can be stated that:

  • In 2022: PP‑A 6, PSOE‑A 4, Vox 2, Por Andalucía 1 (13 seats).
  • In 2026: at least PP‑A 6, Por Andalucía 1, and Adelante Andalucía 1; the complete distribution and vote percentages by party in Granada do not appear in the available texts.

General elections (Congress) in the Granada constituency

Regarding the latest general elections (held on July 23, 2023), the question is about the result in the Granada constituency for the Congress of Deputies: votes, percentages, and seats by party.

Searches in the documentary database used have retrieved abundant material on:

  • Surveys and national aggregators after July 23.
  • Articles on the functioning of constituencies and the D’Hondt method.
  • Results of other regional or local processes.

But they have not returned any detailed table or report of the provincial count for Granada in the 2023 general elections: neither the number of votes by party, nor the percentage in the constituency, nor the exact seat allocation in that province.

Therefore, with the information available in this research, I cannot provide you with a reliable table of votes, percentages, and seats by party in Granada in the latest general elections without resorting to other external sources not included in the consulted material.

How to obtain detailed official data

If you need the exact figures of votes and percentages by party in Granada both in regional and general elections, the safest way is to go directly to the results portals of:

  • The Junta de Andalucía (section for elections to the Andalusian Parliament), where you can filter by province and consult votes and percentages of each list.
  • The Ministry of the Interior and the Central Electoral Board, which publish the official count of general elections with breakdown by provincial constituency, including Granada.

In these official sites you can download the complete results by party: number of votes, percentage of total valid votes, turnout, and final seat distribution in the province.

I regret not being able to go into more detail with concrete numbers based on the consulted texts, but any additional quantitative interpretation about Granada in regional and general elections would be conjectural and would not conform to the data actually retrieved.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

Where did the magnitude 4.8 earthquake recorded this Tuesday occur?

Question 1 of 3

What does the State Civil Protection Plan for Seismic Risk indicate about the probability of catastrophic earthquakes in Spain?

Question 2 of 3

What is one of the factors, besides magnitude, that influences the damage caused by an earthquake?

Question 3 of 3

Hola, soy Fren. ¿Cómo te ayudo?