The Supreme Court clarifies the working day: the 36-hour weekly rest cannot overlap with the 12 hours of daily rest

The Supreme Court reinforces the right of workers to rest and makes clear that the weekly and the daily are distinct and cumulative periods. In practice, that means that the company cannot “put in” the 12 hours between shifts within the 36 hours of weekly rest

3 minutes

Seat of the Supreme Court. Eduardo Parra - Europa Press

Published

Last updated

3 minutes

Weekly rest and daily rest are not the same nor can they be mixed. That is the central idea reinforced by the Supreme Court when analyzing a case on the organization of working time, also in line with European regulations on working hours and rest

The practical conclusion is very relevant for thousands of employees with shifts, weekend work or rotating schedules: if you are entitled to 36 hours of weekly rest, that time cannot also absorb the minimum 12 hours between the end of one workday and the beginning of the next.

The legal basis was already in the Workers' Statute. Article 34.3 establishes that between one workday and the next, there must be, at a minimum, 12 hours. And Article 37.1 recognizes a general minimum weekly rest of one and a half uninterrupted days, that is, 36 hours. When an agreement improves that framework, that weekly rest can be extended, but not worsened or emptied in practice through overlaps.

What does this mean in practice for the working day

What is important for the worker is this: if you finish your workday on a Friday afternoon and return to work on Monday morning, the company cannot count as if that entire block were a single undifferentiated bag of rest. 

Daily and weekly rest have distinct functions and must be respected autonomously, as also provided for by Directive 2003/88/EC concerning the organization of working time and European doctrine on these minimum rest periods.

Translated into normal language: if your agreement sets 36 consecutive hours of weekly rest, to those hours you must add the 12 hours of daily rest when applicable. 

Therefore, in many cases the real rest must be 48 continuous hours, and in other situations even longer if the collective agreement improves the legal minimum. The trick of making both rests coincide so that on paper it seems that everything is complied with when in reality the worker rests less is not valid.

How many hours of rest correspond to you according to the general rule

The general rule of the Workers' Statute is simple. On the one hand, there must be at least 12 hours between the end of one workday and the beginning of the next. On the other hand, the worker is entitled to a minimum weekly rest of one and a half uninterrupted days, accumulable for periods of up to 14 days. That is equivalent to a minimum of 36 weekly hours in the general regime.

From there, many collective agreements improve that floor and raise the weekly rest to 48 hours. In fact, in agreements published in the BOE it expressly appears that to the weekly rest of 36 hours, the 12 hours between shifts must be added, and in others it is even literally stated that daily and weekly rest cannot overlap.

 That is to say, we are not facing a legal extravagance: it is a logic of worker protection that is already reflected in norms and agreements.

What can you do if your company does not respect this break

If in your work calendar you see that you chain workdays, weekends or shifts in such a way that the 12 hours between workdays “disappear” within the weekly rest, there is a basis to review if the rule is being violated. The first thing is to check the applicable agreement, because it can improve the minimum of the Statute. 

The second thing is to review the actual schedules and not just the formal label of “day off”. What counts are the effective hours of rest, not how the company baptizes them.

If you detect overlaps, the usual course of action is to claim internally, go to union representation or file a judicial claim if applicable. The Supreme Court's doctrine precisely reinforces that idea: rest rights cannot be compensated with scheduling engineering

And that, in the midst of a debate about working hours, time control and excess hours, makes this issue one of the most sensitive for workers with rotating shifts, weekends or continuous services.