The court has once again summoned Elisa Mouliaá in the proceedings arising from the lawsuit filed by Íñigo Errejón for alleged defamation, after a forensic report concluded that the actress is able to testify.
The most relevant new development is that, as reported by Cadena SER, the court has warned of possible measures if she fails to appear again on the new scheduled date, including even her arrest and judicial transfer. The proceedings do not correspond to the main case affecting both parties, but to the lawsuit filed by Errejón following public statements by Mouliaá.
Previous absences and the forensic report
Elisa Mouliaá's appearance had already been postponed after she failed to attend on previous occasions, citing health reasons. In view of this situation, the court ordered a forensic evaluation to determine if there was a real impossibility to testify.
That report concluded that the actress has sufficient capacity to appear in court, which has allowed the proceedings to be reactivated. The new summons comes precisely after that medical-legal examination, which clarifies, from a procedural perspective, the debate about her fitness to testify.
The April precedent: Errejón's testimony and Mouliaá's absence
This new judicial move comes after a previous episode in April 2026, when Íñigo Errejón did appear before the judge in the context of the lawsuit for alleged defamation he filed against Elisa Mouliaá.
In that testimony, the former deputy denied having extorted any witness related to the proceedings for the alleged sexual assault reported by the actress and argued that it was one of those witnesses who contacted him voluntarily through his institutional email when he was still a deputy.
Errejón also maintained that Mouliaá's public accusations had defamed him and expressed his confidence that justice would act against what he considered "lies" and "defamation." On the same day, one of the witnesses testified before the judge and assured that he acted on his own initiative and without any pressure from the former Sumar spokesperson.
Mouliaá, however, did not attend that summons. Her defense then alleged an anxious-depressive condition aggravated by her judicial and media situation, with a temporary incapacity that, according to the document submitted to the court, prevented her appearance without risk to her health.
It was then that the judge agreed that a forensic doctor would evaluate his condition to determine if he was really in a condition to testify, a step that has now led to the new judicial summons.