The Mixed Group overturns the 2027 accounts, considering them an archaeological museum of forgotten projects

UPL, by Ávila and Soria ¡Ya! demand that the 2027 budgets be returned for being continuist, propagandistic, and far from the needs of their provinces.

2 minutes

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Published

2 minutes

The three parties that make up the Mixed Parliamentary Group, UPL, Por Ávila and Soria ¡Ya!, on Thursday demanded the withdrawal of the draft budget of the Autonomous Community for 2027, understanding that it lacks novel proposals and does not address the problems of the provinces they represent.

"This project is the expression of an archaeological museum of forgotten projects," criticized the spokesperson for the Mixed Group and UPL representative, Alicia Gallego, who also derided the Junta's "self-promotion" with accounts with which "they say one thing but execute what they consider [fit]."

The León representative also rejected the Draft Law on Tax, Financial and Administrative Measures that accompanies the 2027 budgets, considering that it represents "a back-door loophole to avoid parliamentary processing" in regulatory changes on housing, the environment, or gambling which, in her view, are not strictly financial nor tax-related.

Likewise, she accused the Junta of Castilla y León of criticizing the model for regional financing while "it does nothing" to support the town councils, and censured the treatment dispensed by the regional executive to local entities in situations of catastrophe.

"Where is Soria's priority in these budgets?" asked, for her part, the Soria ¡Ya! representative, Ángel Ceña, who derided that the accounts draft "of the national priority" of the coalition government of PP and Vox leaves the province of Soria out of that principle. "Soria has belonged to the Spanish Nation since the beginning; where is Soria's priority in these budgets? Because it is not there," Ceña added.

The Soria leader described the accounts presented by the Junta as "empty propaganda" that only extends the timelines of the planned investments, "to end up even later," he added, while reproaching that the previous budgets have not had a reasonable execution.

Along the same lines, the Por Ávila representative, Pedro Pascual Muñoz, expressed himself, who defined the accounts as "insufficient, improvable, and continuist" and held PP and Vox responsible for "insisting" on placing the province of Ávila "always last." "They present grandiloquent figures on paper, but the reality for our neighbors is the delay in the priority infrastructures," he said.

"There is only one relevant development for my province, the toll discount in the Community, among them some that affects Ávila," Pedro Pascual Muñoz pointed out, who challenged the PP and Vox to commit now that, if they reach government after the general elections of November 29, "they eliminate the toll in the year 2029 without further excuses".

((((there will be an extension))))