Copia de Copia de Copia de Copia de Copia de Copia de Copia de Copia de Copia de Copia de Bonoloto today: result of Monday, June 8, 2026, complementary and refund

The regulation of Bonoloto in Spain is not currently in any identifiable phase of administrative or parliamentary processing: the relevant regulations that have been located are already fully approved and published in the BOE, and there are no specific projects or draft projects underway regarding this modality. Bonoloto is legally framed as a modality of the Lotería Primitiva or Number Lottery, authorized by Royal Decree 1360/1985 and developed by subsequent regulatory norms and resolutions of the former National Organization of State Lotteries and Betting (ONLAE). The clearest references point to a Resolution of January 20, 1988, from ONLAE that organizes the modality "subscription to four draws – Bonoloto –". In the documents consulted, no reform in processing or public consultation or hearing procedures specifically linked to Bonoloto is observed.

Basic regulatory framework: norms already approved and in force

The starting point is the general regulation on the Lotería Primitiva or Number Lottery, within which Bonoloto is integrated:

1) Royal Decree 1360/1985, of August 1, authorizing the exploitation of the Lotería Primitiva or Number Lottery (BOE-A-1985-16532). This provision:

– Authorizes the exploitation of the Lotería Primitiva or Number Lottery at the national level.
– Does not expressly mention “Bonoloto” in its articles, but establishes the enabling framework for the type of game to which this modality belongs.
– Is already fully approved and published in the BOE; no repeal note appears in the information consulted, so it should be considered in force insofar as it has not been modified by later norms.

2) Order of October 28, 1987, regulating certain aspects of the Lotería Primitiva or Number Lottery (BOE-A-1987-24429). This Order:

– Develops and specifies operational aspects of the Lotería Primitiva or Number Lottery.
– Also does not contain, according to the searches performed, the word “Bonoloto” in its text.
– Is a ministerial order already approved and in force, with no repeal warnings appearing in the consulted record.

From the point of view of “administrative phase,” both Royal Decree 1360/1985 and the Order of October 28, 1987, are in the final phase of the regulatory cycle: approved, published, and applicable. They are not in draft, project, or any processing phase.

Specific norm that gave rise to Bonoloto

The Bonoloto modality is not regulated autonomously in a law or royal decree identified in the BOE by its name, but through a sectoral administrative resolution:

– The Constitutional Court Judgment 164/1994, of May 26 (BOE-T-1994-14597) states that certain jurisdictional conflicts concern Royal Decree 1360/1985 and: “the draws of the Lotería Primitiva in the so-called subscription modality to four draws – Bonoloto –, held from April 4 to 7, 1988, under the Resolution of January 20, 1988, of the Directorate General of the National Organization of State Lotteries and Betting”.

– Similarly, the positive jurisdictional conflict no. 1227/1988 (BOE-A-1988-18139) mentions the draws of the subscription modality to four draws “Bonoloto” held under the same Resolution of January 20, 1988.

From these references it follows that:

– Bonoloto is a modality of the Lotería Primitiva, specifically a “subscription modality to four draws”.
– Its detailed regime was established by a Resolution of the Directorate General of ONLAE dated January 20, 1988, which expands the rules of the Lotería Primitiva to create this modality.

That Resolution of January 20, 1988, has not been directly located in the results used, but the judgments prove that at that time it was already approved and in force. With the available information, it cannot be determined if it has been subsequently modified, consolidated, or replaced by other internal provisions of Lotteries and Betting of the State or the State Society of Lotteries and Betting (SELAE).

Current processing situation: absence of identified reforms

Regarding your question about the current “administrative phase” of Bonoloto regulation, based on the documents effectively consulted, the following can be stated:

– No draft bill, royal decree project, or ministerial order in processing has been identified whose object is to specifically reform or redefine Bonoloto.
– Nor are there, as far as has been read, procedures of prior public consultation, hearing and public information, reports from the Council of State, or recent Council of Ministers agreements aimed at new regulation of this modality.
– The base used focuses on already published norms (BOE/DOUE) and jurisdictional resolutions; it does not provide access to internal processing files that have not reached the BOE.

Therefore, from the legal-formal point of view and with the available information, the regulation of Bonoloto is today in the phase of already approved current regulation, integrated into the general regime of the Lotería Primitiva and the original ONLAE Resolution, with no specific reform in progress within the ordinary regulatory procedure.

The organization of draws like Bonoloto relies on a dual element: the state's ownership of the national lottery game and the attribution of its management to the lottery entity, today SELAE. According to the doctrine of the Constitutional Court, the competence over the Lotería Primitiva and its Bonoloto modality corresponds to the State, which decides the creation of the game and sets its basic framework. On that basis, the Royal Decree 1360/1985, of August 1, and the Royal Decree 773/1989, of June 23, assign to the then Loterías y Apuestas del Estado — direct predecessor of SELAE — the functions of direction, organization, exploitation, design of modalities, setting economic parameters, and management of the commercial network and prizes. All this places SELAE as the executive operator of the state lottery game, within a legal framework set by state norms.

State ownership of the game and general framework

The Constitutional Court Judgment 164/1994, of May 26, regarding jurisdictional conflicts over the Lotería Primitiva and Bonoloto, declares that the ownership of the disputed competence corresponds to the State, in relation to the Royal Decree 1360/1985, of August 1. This judgment confirms that national lottery games, such as the Lotería Primitiva and its Bonoloto modality, are state lotteries: the State decides their creation, authorization, and the basic structure of the game, as well as the general distribution of the revenue.

Royal Decree 1360/1985: creation of the game and management competencies

The Royal Decree 1360/1985, of August 1, authorizing the exploitation of the Lotería Primitiva or Number Lottery, is the foundational norm. It configures the product: a national lottery in which, within a table of consecutive numbers, certain numbers must be guessed that are drawn publicly, including six balls plus a complementary one. The Royal Decree also sets the concept of bet, the value of the bet, and the general structure of prizes and revenue distribution (percentages to prizes, Public Treasury, and administrative expenses), later adjusted by Royal Decree 980/1986.

Regarding the competencies of the lottery entity, the Royal Decree itself provides that the direction, organization, and exploitation of the Lotería Primitiva corresponds to the managing body of state lotteries (originally the National Organization of State Lotteries and Betting, later the public business entity Loterías y Apuestas del Estado, today SELAE). Furthermore, after the modification introduced by Royal Decree 208/2004, the consolidated text expressly attributes to that entity the capacity to:

– Establish modalities of the Lotería Primitiva, "with this or another denomination," with one or several matrices and with the number of draws it determines, including modalities marketed jointly or coordinated with other lotteries.
– Vary the characteristics of the game, introduce new modalities, set the categories of prizes, and determine the price of bets.
– Regulate the operating procedures of the game and set the dates of the draws and their start time.

From this authorization, it follows that, for draws like Bonoloto, SELAE has normative-operational competence over the concrete design of the product (type of bet, prize structure, calendar) within the framework set by the State in Royal Decree 1360/1985.

Economic management and prize payment

Royal Decree 1360/1985 establishes the distribution of the entire revenue among prizes, Public Treasury, and administrative expenses, as well as the rules for accumulation and distribution by prize categories. It corresponds to the lottery entity (SELAE) to apply these criteria in each draw: calculate the funds assigned to each category, manage accumulations when a category is unclaimed, and arrange prize settlement.

The norm states that the entity will establish the form, terms, and conditions under which the National Lottery Administrations and receiving establishments can carry out the sale of tickets and payment of prizes. This places operational economic management competence in SELAE: collection, fund distribution, and materialization of payment to winners through the commercial network.

Organization of draws and commercial network

Royal Decree 1360/1985 authorizes the entity to issue the necessary resolutions to regulate the operating procedures of the game, including determining the start dates and frequency of the draws. In practice, SELAE designs the draw calendar (for example, the days Bonoloto is held) and the technical, security, and validation protocols for bets.

Additionally, the relationship with the commercial network is a central competence. SELAE sets the conditions under which Administrations and receivers sell bets, validate tickets, and pay prizes. In this way, it exercises commercial and operational direction over the entire network of points of sale of state lottery games.

Draws abroad and cooperation with other lotteries

The Royal Decree 773/1989, of June 23, on formal aspects of the draws of State Lotteries and Betting, authorizes the managing body (today SELAE) to arrange the holding abroad of the draw acts of the games it manages and to participate in joint draws with other State Lotteries, constituting common prize funds, always respecting the legal percentages allocated to prizes.

This Royal Decree also regulates the control table of the draws (presided over by the Director General of State Lotteries and Betting and with the intervention of a public notary) and empowers the entity to make contributions for charitable, social, or cultural purposes linked to those draws. This reinforces SELAE's competence over the material organization of draws, whether on national territory or abroad.

Fit within the general gaming regulation

SELAE's activity is today integrated within the general framework of the Law 13/2011, of May 27, on gaming regulation, modified by the Law 23/2022, of November 2. However, in the information consulted, the detailed articles of Law 13/2011 are not available, so it is not possible to specify literally how SELAE is currently defined. With the norms effectively seen, it can be stated that the State holds ownership of the national lottery game and that SELAE exercises, by normative delegation, the functions of direction, organization, exploitation, design of modalities, economic management, and coordination of the commercial network in draws like Bonoloto.

In recent times, reforms on gambling in the Congress of Deputies have been mainly driven by the Government (PSOE and Sumar) and, in opposition, by groups such as PP, Vox, and nationalist or left-wing formations that have focused on the protection of minors, advertising, and control of online gambling. However, with the information available in the sources consulted, no specific and detailed initiatives for this legislature have been identified on which a precise list with dates and official titles can be provided. It is generally observed that the dominant line of proposals is to strengthen regulation rather than liberalize it, with emphasis on the health dimension and consumer protection. No further disaggregated information by specific initiative is available in the sources consulted.

Driving parties and general orientation of reforms

1. Role of the Government (PSOE and Sumar)

At the state level, the most significant reforms in gambling regulations in recent years have mainly come from the Government, first with PSOE alone and more recently with the PSOE–Sumar coalition. These reforms have been channeled through normative projects linked to:

• The strengthening of restrictions on gambling and betting advertising, especially online and during time slots with significant presence of minors.
• Protection of minors and vulnerable persons, through access control measures, warning messages, and limitations on promotions and bonuses.
• The approach to gambling as a public health issue, linking problem gambling regulation to addiction and prevention policies.

Within this framework, the Government acts as promoter of the norms that reach Congress for validation or processing (for example, royal decree-laws or bills), so although formally the proposer is the Executive, its political orientation is identified with the government bloc (PSOE and Sumar in the current legislature).

2. People's Party (PP)

PP, as the main opposition party, has participated in the debate on gambling regulation with a nuanced position: it accepts the need to protect minors and combat gambling addiction but usually shows more caution regarding overregulation that may affect economic activity and the leisure sector. In parliamentary initiatives and debates:

• It defends control and prevention mechanisms against problem gambling.
• It is more sensitive to the legal security of sector companies and the impact on employment and revenue.
• It usually requests harmonization of competencies between the State and autonomous communities without invading the autonomous margin.

No exhaustive detail of recent PP bills specifically focused on gambling is available in the sources consulted, but its relevant role in negotiating and amending texts promoted by the Government is noted.

3. Vox

Vox has also positioned itself in gambling debates, combining two vectors: appeal to economic freedom and concern about the social impact of gambling in certain neighborhoods or groups. Generally:

• It rejects regulations considered ideological or excessively interventionist.
• Maintains a discourse of public order and family protection against addictions.
• Occasionally proposes toughening sanctions and controls for operators who violate regulations.

The available information does not allow specifying the number or exact content of bills registered by Vox on this matter, although its presence in debate and amendment of gambling norms reaching Congress is noted.

4. Nationalist and left-wing groups (ERC, Bildu, PNV, others)

Formations such as ERC, EH Bildu, PNV, or other left-wing groups have used initiatives related to gambling to insist on three main axes:

• Protection of minors and vulnerable neighborhoods, with special emphasis on the proliferation of betting shops in certain urban areas.
• Respect and expansion of autonomous competencies in the regulation of in-person gambling.
• Integration of the gambling phenomenon into broader public health and social exclusion fight strategies.

Occasionally, these groups have registered non-legislative motions or bills aimed at tightening requirements for the establishment of gambling venues, improving coordination between administrations, and strengthening the preventive aspect.

Predominant reform lines

1. Protection of minors and responsible gambling

Almost all parties involved in recent reforms share the idea of strengthening protection of minors and vulnerable groups. Differences arise in the degree of intervention: the government bloc and the left usually defend broader restrictions, while PP and Vox emphasize not excessively harming economic activity.

2. Advertising and online gambling

The regulation of gambling advertising, especially on the internet and digital platforms, is another major axis. The Government (PSOE and Sumar) has been the main driver of tightening these rules, while the opposition has focused much of its action on debating their scope, proposing modifications and safeguards, and in some cases, resorting to constitutional control.

3. Competency distribution and territorial control

Nationalist parties and some territorial forces insist that the regulation of in-person gambling (arcades, bingo halls, casinos, slot machines) must respect and, if possible, expand the margin of autonomous communities. The Government and PP tend to defend a certain degree of basic state harmonization, especially in aspects such as protection of minors and online gambling, which by nature transcend autonomous borders.

In summary, although a detailed inventory of each recent parliamentary initiative on gambling is not available, the sources allow affirming that the Government (PSOE–Sumar) is the main driver of reforms, and that PP, Vox, and nationalist and left-wing groups have actively participated in their orientation and debate, with differentiated approaches on advertising, protection of minors, economic freedom, and competency distribution. No further information in the consulted sources allows listing concrete titles, dates, and detailed content of each proposal.