First head rolling in the midterms? Trump studies replacing Hegseth after the Republican defeat

Trump considers removing Hegseth after the Republican defeat, according to CBS Donald Trump is weighing replacing Pete Hegseth at the head of the Pentagon after the Republican defeat in the legislative elections, according to information attributed to CBS. The Secretary of Defense could become one of the first cabinet departures after the elections, while criticism grows from within the Republican ranks themselves

2 minutes

fotonoticia 20261008234705 1920
Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Published

Last updated

2 minutes

Pete Hegseth has a problem within his own party. Hours after the Republican defeat in the legislative elections, Senator Thom Tillis has questioned whether the Defense Secretary is the right person to negotiate the Pentagon’s needs with Congress; Vice President Vance has said that the midterms have been lost “because of the Iran war,” and Trump, according to CBS, would be studying his replacement.

There is no announced dismissal. But the continuation of Hegseth is entering the discussion about how to respond to the electoral outcome and how to move forward decisions that require parliamentary agreements. The head of Defense faces pressure from the opposition and from the ranks that support the president.

A Republican senator questions his continued tenure

Tillis has said in remarks to CBS that Hegseth is one of the reasons why the Pentagon lacks the funding guarantees it needs. The senator from North Carolina raises the possibility of reviewing whether he should continue to be the person tasked with presenting those needs to lawmakers during the weeks remaining of the current legislature.

His opposition precedes the electoral outcome. Last month he already asked Trump to look for another person to head the Pentagon and criticized the departure of experienced military commanders. Now he places the debate on an immediate issue: the secretary’s ability to secure parliamentary backing.

The intervention has a political consequence. The discussion about Hegseth can no longer be presented only as a Democratic offensive against a president’s aide. There are Republicans who consider his staying on to be an obstacle to reaching agreements.

Defense funding increases the pressure

The conflict could take shape before the new lawmakers take their seats. According to The Hill, Democrats have threatened to block the extraordinary Defense funding requested by the Administration and the Pentagon’s annual budget bill.

The Democratic senator Tim Kaine has argued qthat a departure by Hegseth would facilitate agreements between the two parties. The Republican Thomas Massie has also announced that he will push for a vote on his removal through the impeachment procedure when parliamentary activity resumes.

Democrats prepare investigations into the Pentagon

The electoral victory will allow Democrats to direct the committees of Congress and strengthen oversight of the Administration. Hegseth figures among the top objectives of that control offensive, according to information published by Punchbowl News after the elections.

For the Pentagon, the change entails facing a parliamentary majority willing to examine its management. The decisions of the secretary, his explanations to legislators, and the documentation he provides to facilitate billing will take on greater political importance.

Friction over access to information already existed before the elections. The Washington Post has described pressures from Republican senators to obtain materials about military operations against alleged drug traffickers in Latin America. That precedent shows that oversight demands do not come exclusively from the opposition either.

The war with Iran weighs on the outcome

Trump has acknowledged that the war with Iran influenced the defeat, although he maintains his defense of the decision to initiate the conflict. During the campaign, the Democratic candidates linked the war to the rising cost of fuel and the cost of living.

That debate affects directly the person in charge of Defense, but it does not allow attributing the electoral outcome to him alone. The defeat opens up a broader discussion of these decisions and points in a specific direction, that of the leader of the Defense department.