The debate over the V16 beacon takes a new turn. Vox has registered an amendment to eliminate its mandatory nature and allow drivers to continue using emergency triangles. The proposal comes just months after this device became mandatory in Spain.
What would change if approved
The amendment proposes a profound change in current regulations:
- The V16 beacon would become optional
- Traditional triangles would remain valid indefinitely
- Geolocation or connection with the General Directorate of Traffic would not be mandatory
In practice, the driver could choose which system to use.
Criticism of the current model
From Vox, the effectiveness of the V16 beacon and its mandatory nature are questioned, stating:
- Lack of consensus with other European countries
- Doubts about its effectiveness on the road
- Criticism from associations linked to road safety
The party defends that one must bet on "contrasted" measures before imposing new obligations.
The key argument: freedom of choice
The proposal insists that it makes no sense to force drivers to use a single system.
It proposes that each user can decide between:
- The luminous beacon
- The reflective triangles
All of this without imposing additional costs.
A broader debate in Congress
The amendment is part of a broader reform of the traffic law promoted by the PSOE. Other parties have also presented relevant proposals:
- Sumar proposes fines based on income, with increases of up to 500%
- Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya proposes changes to driving tests in Catalonia
Road safety vs. cost for the driver
While the DGT bets on connected systems to improve emergency response, part of the opposition questions whether the measure is really effective or just adds costs.