The Court of Instruction No. 19 of Madrid has processed an appeal filed by the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office against the judge's ruling that rejected the request of the Central Operational Unit (UCO) of the Civil Guard to access tax and Social Security General Treasury information in the case affecting Alberto González Amador for alleged crimes of business corruption and disloyal administration.
Through a provision dated June 29, which Europa Press has accessed and was reported by "Cadena SER", the magistrate agrees to admit the appeal against the order issued on June 10, subsequently clarified on June 26, and grants the involved parties a period of five days to present their allegations before sending the procedure to the Provincial Court.
In the appeal brief, the representative of the Public Ministry requests that the Court set aside the instructor's decision and order the issuance of the tax and Social Security data requests that the UCO had requested from the State Tax Administration Agency (AEAT) and the General Social Security Treasury (TGSS).
Anti-Corruption insists that the asset analysis was commissioned to the UCO with the aim of determining whether the possible proceeds of the investigated criminal activities could have been transformed or camouflaged to hide their illicit origin.
In that context, the Civil Guard requested information relating to three individuals—Alberto González Amador, Gloria Carrasco Fernández, and Fernando Javier Camino Marculet—as well as three companies linked to the businessman.
The prosecutor expresses his disagreement with the judge's criteria for three main reasons. Firstly, he argues that it is contradictory to allow access to the bank movements of the investigated individuals and, yet, deny tax and Social Security data, which he considers less intrusive and which, moreover, are already in the possession of the Administration.
Secondly, he highlights that the UCO itself has warned that lacking this information "greatly" hinders the development of the investigation, as it concerns data that complements banking information and is essential for carrying out a global economic examination to detect possible undeclared income or significant discrepancies for the procedure.
Lastly, Anticorruption maintains that postponing these requests harms both the general interest and the investigated parties themselves, by unnecessarily prolonging the investigation phase. Therefore, it is of interest that the Provincial Court orders the collection of the documentation requested by the UCO in its official letters of December 2025 and June 2026.