Peru holds its breath as Fujimori and Sánchez battle for the presidency vote by vote

With the country divided into two almost identical blocs, the scrutiny of the last ballots and the vote from abroad will be decisive in determining whether Peru joins the conservative advance sweeping Latin America or maintains a progressive alternative at the head of the Government

5 minutes

ILUSTRACIONES TEMAS (8)

ILUSTRACIONES TEMAS (8)

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Published

Last updated

5 minutes

Most read

Peru is living through nail-biting hours with a tight presidential election that, at the time this article is written, has not yet produced a clear winner.

Last Sunday, Peruvians were called to the polls for the second round of an election that pitted Keiko Fujimori, candidate for Fuerza Popular and daughter of the autocrat Alberto Fujimori, against Roberto Sánchez, a leftist candidate from Juntos por el Perú.

According to the data provided by the National Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE) - and which DEMÓCRATA is following minute by minute - the tight difference between the two candidates maintains a scenario of technical tie, while the scrutiny of the last pending ballots continues.

About 5% of the votes still remain to be counted, mainly from rural areas, where Sánchez shows greater electoral support.

Likewise, the counting of ballots continues with the ballots from abroad, which already account for about one in every four ballots scrutinized. With the latest count data, Fujimori obtains 49.93% of the votes, while Roberto Sánchez stands at 50.07%.

The vote cast from Peruvian consulates abroad continues to show a clear inclination towards the right-wing candidate, who concentrates approximately two-thirds of these ballots.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has reported that the reception of the ballots corresponding to this overseas vote will conclude this Wednesday, a process that includes the results from 2,506 polling stations distributed in 73 countries.

Calls for calm amid the wait for the final result

With the scrutiny advancing at this hour (9:00 PM on Tuesday) to 95.9% of the total count, the electoral process in Peru enters its decisive phase, although there are still 2,202 pending ballots and another 1,547 challenged ballots to be counted, currently under review by the Special Electoral Juries (JEE). Together, these documents represent around 1,124,700 votes yet to be determined.

More than 27.3 million Peruvians went to the polls to elect the country's next president for the 2026-2031 period, in an election marked by uncertainty and the backdrop of a decade of political instability in which Peru has had eight presidents in ten years.

Absenteeism has become one of the most relevant elements of the second round of the presidential election in Peru. Of the 27,325,432 citizens called to the polls, approximately 25% did not go to the polls, which is equivalent to about seven million people.

This is one of the highest figures recorded in the last two decades for a second round in the country. In the first round of the general elections held in April, the number of absentees reached 7.1 million voters.

In this scenario of maximum expectation, Roberto Sánchez expressed himself last Monday "confident and optimistic", although he insisted on the need to wait for the total closure of the scrutiny before proclaiming any results. For her part, Keiko Fujimori also called for prudence and serenity while the count continues, assuring that she will respect the final result "whatever it may be".

Fujimori: third time's the charm

After three consecutive defeats at the polls —against Ollanta Humala in 2011, Pedro Pablo Kuczynski in 2016, and Pedro Castillo in 2021—, Fujimori could finally reach the Presidency of Peru this electoral cycle.

However, if her victory is confirmed, it would be by a very narrow margin, reflecting a deeply divided society and an electoral contest marked by polarization.

In a campaign marked by citizen concern about insecurity and political instability, Fujimori has focused her discourse on the promise to restore order under the slogan "Fujimori returns, order returns".

With Peru going through a decade of strong institutional volatility, in which eight presidents have held power, Fujimori has presented herself to the electorate as an alternative capable of offering stability and a firm response to the increase in crime.

During the only televised debate of the campaign, the candidate presented her proposals on citizen security. Among them, she proposed that people deprived of their liberty carry out work to cover part of their maintenance costs and participate in public utility projects.

Fujimori's legacy

In that debate, Fujimori analyzed what, in her opinion, is the situation in the country and even described a Peru marked by insecurity and violence. "Our country lives in a topsy-turvy world. Military and police are persecuted, neighbors live behind bars, and criminals are free [...] From day one, we will act with great force", she stated.

Along these lines, she promised the expulsion of irregular migrants who commit crimes and the permanent deployment of police and military personnel on public transport in the main metropolitan areas.

But her speech did not only focus on the present. She also resorted to the past to appeal to her father's legacy. Alberto Fujimori was president of Peru between 1990 and 2000. He came to power with a discourse of change in the face of crisis and during his term he applied harsh reforms that stabilized the economy, although his government was marked by a self-coup, accusations of authoritarianism and serious human rights violations, as well as a corruption network. After his fall, he was sentenced to 25 years in prison.

"In order to combat terrorism, the armed forces, the National Police were strengthened, we worked with the peasant patrols, the self-defense committees and the organized population, there was a state presence at the national level… we will do the same now against criminality", his daughter stated during the electoral debate, whitewashing his legacy.

The "heir of the hat"

On the other side is Roberto Sánchez, who seeks to attract especially the vote of the followers of Pedro Castillo, the former president currently imprisoned after his attempted self-coup in 2022. His campaign has been closely linked to this political inheritance, to the point of being presented as the "heir of the hat" of Castillo, a symbol with which he tries to represent the rural world and the electorate of the Andean regions.

The candidate of Juntos por el Perú has followed the so-called "castillista route" during the campaign, a strategy that replicates the political journey that led Castillo from rural areas to the presidency in 2021.

The link between the two was strengthened after a message of support from Pedro Castillo from prison, in which the former president symbolically handed over his hat as political endorsement. Since then, Sánchez has insisted on the need to free his predecessor and has even proposed a possible pardon if he comes to power.

Founder of Juntos por el Perú in 2008, Sánchez has historically defended democratic left-wing positions, including the proposal for a new Constitution and the revision of the economic model.

However, in the final weeks of the campaign, he has tried to project a more moderate image, incorporating commitments to macroeconomic stability, respect for the autonomy of the Central Bank, and maintenance of free trade agreements.

Born in Huaral in 1969, the son of a working-class family, Sánchez has built his political narrative around his humble origins. Before his political career, he studied psychology and worked in the public sector, in addition to participating in social projects linked to vulnerable communities.

Political Thermometer of Latin America

In recent years, Latin America has experienced a profound change in its political landscape. After a period marked by the rise of progressive governments, the right has regained prominence with electoral victories in countries such as Argentina, Ecuador, Panama, the Dominican Republic, Chile, Bolivia, and Costa Rica, consolidating a conservative shift that has redefined the balance of power in the region.

The outcome of the Peruvian elections acquires a relevance that transcends its borders. The result will not only determine who will occupy the presidency of the Andean country for the next five years, but will also serve as a thermometer to measure whether the conservative current advancing in Latin America maintains its momentum.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What are the next steps in the Peruvian electoral process after the closing of the vote count?

Next steps in the Peruvian electoral process after the closing of the vote count

Summary of the next steps

After the closing of the vote count in Peru, the electoral process does not end immediately: a key legal-administrative phase opens before proclaiming definitive results. In general terms, first the official records and tallies are closed and published, then challenges and appeals are resolved before the competent electoral juries, and only when no disputes remain pending does the electoral body proclaim the results. Finally, credentials are issued to the elected authorities and the swearing-in takes place on the constitutionally fixed date.

Since I specialize in politics and institutional processes in Spain, I do not have direct and updated access to all the technical details of Peruvian electoral regulations nor to its specific schedule for this particular cycle. Still, the scheme of “final tally – resolution of claims – proclamation – swearing-in” is the one that usually governs most electoral processes in the region, including the Peruvian case, with the particularities established by its internal legislation.

Closing of the vote count and final tally

After the closing of the polling stations, the electoral authority centralizes the count based on the records sent from the voting centers. The so-called “closing of the vote count” usually means that:

1. 100 % of the processed and counted records have been tallied, including votes from abroad and polling stations that were observed and later reviewed by the competent bodies. 2. An official tally at 100 % is published, which serves as a reference, but may still be subject to specific variations if formal claims remain pending regarding particular records or partial nullifications.

At this point, what changes is that the debate shifts from the purely numerical field (counting) to the legal field (challenges and legality control of the voting).

Challenges, nullifications, and appeals

The usual next step is the resolution of all challenges to the process:

1. Challenges to records or polling stations: political parties may have submitted, within legal deadlines, challenges to vote count records, alleging material errors, numerical inconsistencies, or irregularities affecting the validity of the vote at a specific polling station or district. 2. Requests for nullification of voting: in more serious cases, total or partial nullifications are requested due to alleged violations of electoral regulations (for example, problems with polling station setup, voter coercion, prohibited propaganda on election day, etc.).

These disputes are usually first processed before regional or decentralized electoral bodies (in Peru, the special electoral juries) and later before the national body on appeal. While appeals are pending, the result in those polling stations or districts remains “in dispute” and the elected authorities cannot be definitively proclaimed.

Proclamation of official results

Once all challenges and appeals are resolved, the national electoral body proceeds to:

1. Proclamation of results by districts: first, results of each jurisdiction (regions, provinces, districts, or other levels) are usually proclaimed in the case of subnational elections, or the seats assigned by each district if it is a legislative election. 2. Proclamation of national results: when all tallies are final, the winning candidate or ticket is officially proclaimed and the definitive distribution of positions is made public.

This proclamation is normally recorded in formal resolutions of the electoral body and published in the official Peruvian gazette (equivalent to the Spanish BOE), which grants full legal force to the result.

Issuance of credentials and swearing-in

After the proclamation, the standard procedure continues with:

1. Issuance of credentials: the proclaimed candidates receive an official document (credential) that certifies their status as elected. Without this credential, they cannot assume office. The issuance usually takes place in institutional acts organized by the electoral authority. 2. Swearing-in and assumption of office: according to the Peruvian Constitution and laws, there is a fixed date or time range in which the president, congress members, or other authorities must swear in. This ceremony may be held before Congress, other judicial authorities, or the electoral body itself, depending on the office.

From that moment, the new authority takes office and the institutional transition occurs with respect to the outgoing legislature or mandate.

Limitations and contextual warnings

My main specialization is the Spanish political and regulatory environment; in the case of the Peruvian electoral process, I can only offer a general scheme based on comparative institutional logic. I do not currently have specific data on exact deadlines, resolutions already issued, nor on whether relevant appeals are still pending in this particular electoral cycle. I also do not have access to notes from Peruvian media for this specific election, so I cannot specify whether the proclamation has already occurred or if the contentious phase remains open.

To know the exact situation today in Peru (for example, if the winner has already been proclaimed, how many appeals remain pending, or when the swearing-in will be), it is essential to consult directly the Peruvian electoral bodies and local press. My contribution should therefore be understood as a structural guide of the steps that, in legal-institutional terms, usually follow the closing of the vote count in an electoral process of this type.

What powers does the president of Peru have according to the country's Constitution?

Powers of the president of Peru according to the Constitution

Initial summary

The President of the Republic of Peru, according to the Peruvian Constitution of 1993 and its reforms, is the Head of State, Head of Government, and the highest authority of the Executive Power. His powers include directing the general policy of the country, conducting foreign relations, supreme command of the Armed Forces and the National Police, as well as significant legislative and congressional oversight faculties. He also has powers in appointing high officials, managing public administration, and declaring states of emergency. All this is framed within a presidential system with strong checks and balances from the Legislative Power, the Judiciary, and constitutionally autonomous bodies.

General constitutional role

The Peruvian Constitution establishes that the president is the Head of State and personifies the Nation. He exercises the Headship of the Executive Power and is responsible for directing the general policy of the Government. In this capacity, he coordinates and controls the work of the ministers and the Council of Ministers, who are politically accountable before Congress. Although he concentrates numerous powers, his authority is limited by the need for ministerial endorsement for the validity of most of his acts, and by the permanent oversight of Parliament and control bodies.

Powers in domestic policy and government management

Internally, the president directs the general policy of the country and the Government's action, setting guidelines and objectives that ministries must execute. He has the power to appoint and remove the President of the Council of Ministers (Prime Minister) and, on the latter's proposal, to appoint and dismiss the other ministers. He can accept or reject the collective resignation of the Council of Ministers and, under certain circumstances, recompose the cabinet to maintain or regain Congress's confidence.

Likewise, he is responsible for ensuring internal order and the normal functioning of public services, as well as enforcing laws and ensuring the execution of the budget approved by Congress. Among his functions, he participates in formulating the State's annual budget and development plans, which are then submitted for parliamentary approval. The Constitution also grants him the power to regulate laws through supreme decrees, always respecting the content and limits of the legal norm.

Relationship with Congress and legislative powers

The president's relationship with Congress is one of the central axes of his powers. He can present bills on all matters, which enjoy priority in parliamentary processing when requested by the Executive. He has the power to observe (veto) laws approved by Congress totally or partially, returning them with his objections; if Congress insists by the required constitutional majority, the law is promulgated without his signature.

Additionally, he can request Congress's authorization to legislate by legislative decrees on specific matters and for a determined time, allowing him to develop complex regulatory frameworks with some agility. He has the power to issue urgent decrees on economic and financial matters in exceptional situations, which must be subject to subsequent congressional control. In political oversight, the Constitution also grants him the power to dissolve Congress if it has denied confidence to two Councils of Ministers, mandatorily calling for new legislative elections.

Powers in foreign relations and defense

The president is responsible for conducting the country's foreign policy. He directs diplomatic relations, signs and concludes international treaties, which must then be approved or ratified by Congress according to their nature. He appoints ambassadors and diplomatic representatives of Peru abroad and receives the credentials of foreign heads of mission accredited to the Peruvian State.

In defense and security matters, he holds supreme command of the Armed Forces and the National Police. He is empowered to deploy them to guarantee independence, territorial integrity, and internal order, according to constitutional conditions and limits. He can also declare war and sign peace, always with prior authorization from Congress, as well as adopt mobilization and national defense measures in situations of external threat.

States of emergency and protection of constitutional order

The Peruvian Constitution grants the president the power to declare, by supreme decree and with the endorsement of the Council of Ministers, a state of emergency or a state of siege, in part or all of the national territory, in situations of serious disturbance of peace, disasters, or danger to the constitutional order. These declarations allow temporarily restricting certain fundamental rights (such as freedom of movement, assembly, or inviolability of domicile), always under temporal limits and with political control by Congress.

As guarantor of the constitutional order, the president must ensure respect for the separation of powers and the functioning of democratic institutions. In case of presidential vacancy (due to resignation, permanent incapacity, death, or other causes provided), the constitutional framework itself establishes succession, reinforcing the institutional character of his powers, subordinated to the rule of law.

Appointment of high officials and other powers

Among additional powers are the authority to appoint certain high State officials, usually with participation or ratification by other bodies. For example, he can appoint the general commanders of the Armed Forces and Police; intervene in the appointment of directors of key public entities; and grant decorations and distinctions on behalf of the Nation. Likewise, he has the power to grant pardons and commute sentences in specific cases, except in crimes expressly excluded by the Constitution or law.

Together, these powers configure a presidency with broad executive, defense, and foreign policy competencies, balanced by the need for collaboration and control with Congress, the Judiciary, and autonomous bodies. The effective balance between these formal powers and institutional checks is one of the key elements for political and democratic stability in Peru.

What political and professional background has Roberto Sánchez followed before becoming a presidential candidate?

Roberto Sánchez's background before becoming a presidential candidate

Roberto Helbert Sánchez Palomino is a left-wing Peruvian politician, psychologist by training, and leader of Juntos por el Perú, who became the presidential candidate in the 2026 general elections in Peru after a career marked by party work, parliamentary representation, and ministerial management. Before running for the Presidency, he had been a Congressman of the Republic and a central figure in the articulation of the contemporary Peruvian left. He is also identified as the political heir of the space linked to Pedro Castillo, with a social, rural, and constituent discourse. His trajectory is therefore situated in the political context of Peru, not Spain.

Origin, education, and early public references

According to available biography, Roberto Sánchez was born on February 3, 1969 in Huaral, on the central coast of Peru, and is a psychologist by profession, which gives him a technical profile in social sciences before his consolidation as a political leader (general biography). Open sources do not detail precisely his work experience outside politics (workplaces, specializations, or clinical practice), but they agree that his public projection is dominated by his political and party activity. This educational background is reflected in a discourse focused on social rights, territorial cohesion, and institutional reform.

Building a left-wing political space

The distinctive feature of his career prior to the presidential candidacy is his role in the construction and leadership of Juntos por el Perú (JP). Sources point to him as one of the promoters of the project since 2008 and, later, as president of the national executive committee since 2017, when the leftist coalition around the former Peruvian Humanist Party was consolidated (profile in JP, political profile). From this position, Sánchez acts as an articulator of alliances with other progressive forces, such as Nuevo Perú, and positions himself as a leader of a “democratic left” that combines criticism of the economic model with defense of macroeconomic stability and respect for free trade agreements.

Ideologically, he self-defines as leftist and at the same time social Christian, proposing a synthesis between social justice, community values, and deep political reforms (international press profile). This combination allows him to build bridges toward moderate sectors without abandoning an agenda of constitutional change and review of contracts in strategic sectors, in line with a narrative of “refounding the homeland.”

Institutional career: Congress and government experience

Sánchez's leap to the institutional forefront came with his election as Congressman of the Republic for the period 2021-2026, representing the Lima Metropolitan district, on the Juntos por el Perú list (parliamentary data). From Congress, he is positioned on the left-wing axis, defending the expansion of social rights, universal public education, and a more active role of the State in reducing territorial inequalities. This parliamentary stage consolidates his national visibility and offers him a platform to position himself as a reference for a progressive project with urban and rural bases.

Besides his legislative role, sources present him as a former minister, integrated in the political space associated with Pedro Castillo and the left bloc that governed from 2021 (CIDOB). Other profiles mention that he was Minister of Foreign Trade and Tourism during Castillo's government, promoting regional integration and strengthening tourism with a focus on “deep Peru” and rural and Amazonian communities, although without entering into a detailed chronology of his management. That executive experience reinforces his image as a leader capable of managing public policies, not just articulating discourses.

Positioning and consolidation as a national figure

In the stage immediately prior to his presidential candidacy, Sánchez consolidates as one of the most visible leaders of the post-Castillo Peruvian left. International press and analysis centers agree in describing him as “heir of Pedro Castillo's hat”, alluding both to symbols (the famous hat that Castillo gives him as a gesture of continuity) and to his commitment to represent the rural, Andean, and popular electorate that supported Castillism (El País analysis, RTVE interview).

Programmatically, before becoming a candidate he already defended a combination of constitutional reform, fight against corruption, expansion of public education, and preservation of macroeconomic stability, respecting the autonomy of the central bank and international trade agreements (CIDOB). This mix of ambitious social agenda and messages of stability seeks to differentiate him both from the Fujimorist right and from more radical or anti-system options.

All this culminates in his designation as presidential candidate of Juntos por el Perú for the 2026 general elections, where he competes in a polarized scenario against Keiko Fujimori. His candidacy is supported by a previous trajectory that combines party leadership, legislative representation, and ministerial experience, built over nearly two decades of work in the Peruvian left.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What is the percentage of votes counted at the time the news was written?

Question 1 of 3

What slogan has Keiko Fujimori used in her electoral campaign?

Question 2 of 3

Why is Roberto Sánchez known as the "heir of the hat"?

Question 3 of 3

Hola, soy Fren. ¿Cómo te ayudo?