Tucker Carlson ha situato una data nel dibattito sul prossimo passo di Donald Trump in Iran. In un messaggio pubblicato domenica 1 novembre, l'ex conduttore di Fox News sostiene che, secondo persone che seguono da vicino le deliberazioni, il presidente statunitense probabilmente deciderà entro sabato 7 se autorizza o scarta l'uso di armi nucleari. Carlson non identifica queste persone né presenta alcuna prova a sostegno della sua versione ed è stato respinto dagli analisti statunitensi, nonostante il vecchio ascendente del commentatore tra fonti repubblicane.
Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. "Bibi calls Trump about it every day," says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week's election results, he can't form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he's applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they've so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu's lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America's longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won't recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We've been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America's nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called "battlefield nukes" easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we're on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he's hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They're right, though it won't be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn't been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) November 2, 2026
Cosa dice Carlson sul calendario delle midterm
L’espressione che utilizza è «by next weekend»: per il prossimo fine settimana. Lo stesso Carlson precisa che si riferisce al 7 novembre. Le elezioni di metà mandato si tengono martedì 3, per cui la scadenza che descrive comprende i giorni precedenti e successivi alla votazione. La data corrisponde alla presunta decisione di Trump, non all’esecuzione di un attacco.
Sì, ci sono informazioni indipendenti che collegano il calendario elettorale a una possibile escalation militare. Secondo Axios, Trump e il primo ministro israeliano, Benjamín Netanyahu, hanno parlato sabato dei negoziati con l’Iran e della possibilità di riprendere i combattimenti dopo le midterm. Queste informazioni si riferiscono a operazioni militari; non confermano che Washington stia preparando un attacco con armi nucleari.
Pickaxe Mountain: cosa ha detto Trump e cosa gli attribuisce Carlson
Carlson identifica come possibile obiettivo Pickaxe Mountain, una struttura sotterranea del centro dell’Iran. Attribuisce all’intelligence israeliana il sospetto che Teheran vi abbia ripreso l’arricchimento dell’uranio e sostiene che Netanyahu faccia pressione su Trump affinché agisca. Nel suo racconto, il vicepresidente americano, JD Vance, e l’inviato speciale Steve Witkoff difendono di dare più tempo alla diplomazia. Il commentatore non fornisce documentazione pubblica su queste conversazioni.
Le dichiarazioni pubbliche di Trump consentono di precisare fino a dove arriva l’informazione. Sabato, davanti ai giornalisti in Florida, il presidente ha effettivamente indicato Pickaxe Mountain parlando delle installazioni iraniane che gli Stati Uniti potrebbero colpire. Non ha detto che avrebbe utilizzato un’arma nucleare. Il 16 ottobre, interrogato su questa possibilità in un’intervista con Newsmax, l’aveva esclusa espressamente.
La distinzione è decisiva: colpire un’installazione legata al programma nucleare iraniano e farlo con un’arma nucleare sono due decisioni diverse. Trump ha parlato pubblicamente della prima. La seconda è l’ipotesi avanzata da Carlson, e il 7 novembre è il termine citato dalle sue fonti, non un ultimatum annunciato dalla Casa Bianca.