Influencers and their digital power before 29N: Samantha Hudson, from anti-capitalist activism to housing protests

The singer and content creator, known for her LGTBI activism, her left-wing discourse, and her criticisms of capitalism, has denounced that the Police sprayed her with pepper spray during the 11N protests in Madrid

EuropaPress 7557351 influencer samantha hudson interviene entrega premios triangulo otorgados

EuropaPress 7557351 influencer samantha hudson interviene entrega premios triangulo otorgados

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

4 minutes

Most read

Elecciones 29N · Encuestas

La media de las encuestas

Media a 10 de noviembre de 2026 · 15 institutos

  • PP31,5 %
  • PSOE26,8 %
  • Vox19,1 %
  • Frente Amplio6,2 %
  • ERC2,5 %
01020304050ene 2024jul 2024ene 2025jul 2025ene 2026jul 2026

Media del último estudio de cada instituto en 30 días y su evolución semanal desde el 23J. Partidos con al menos un 2 %.

Todas las encuestas

Elecciones generales del 29 de noviembre · Demócrata

Samantha Hudson has taken her activism back to the streets. The artist, singer, and content creator participated this Wednesday in the demonstrations of the general strike of 11 November and denounced that she had been sprayed with pepper spray during charges by the National Police on the Gran Vía in Madrid. "Doing nothing, they came straight for us," she said to the media, visibly affected.

Alongside her were the journalist María Barrier, with whom she shares the podcast Bimboficadas, and the actress Laura Weissmahr. The three were taking part in the protest when riot police intervened to clear the roadway, occupied by protesters for about two hours.

"We were at the front line without using violence and they pushed us up against the sidewalk," Hudson explained. According to Barrier's account, the agents used the aerosol directly against their eyes and respiratory pathways, when they could no longer back up.

The artist and singer Samantha Hudson (i) at an information picket concentrating on the Gran Vía, during the day of the general strike called by the unions. | Europa Press
The artist and singer Samantha Hudson at an information picket concentrating on the Gran Vía, during the day of the general strike called by the unions. | Europa Press -

Hudson's presence at the strike is not unrelated to her trajectory. The defense of labor rights, class consciousness, feminism, and the fight against discrimination against LGTBI people are part of her public discourse, both in her appearances and in her songs. Although her popularity was born on the internet, she has used that visibility to take part in political and social debates.

Who is Samantha Hudson and how did she become famous

Born in León in 1999 and raised in Mallorca, Samantha Hudson began to become known as a teenager. At 15, she recorded Maricón, a music video made as a school assignment in which she criticized the Catholic Church and its relationship with homosexuality.

The song sparked a controversy that went beyond the school. The Bishop's Office of Mallorca and conservative organizations questioned the video, while the controversy multiplied its spread on the internet. That experience ended up becoming one of the decisive episodes of her career.

Since then, she has developed a career that combines electronic music, stage performances, television, film, and social media. In 2021 she published Total liquidation, a project in which religious and political satire had a prominent weight. One of her best-known tracks, For Spain, uses symbols associated with Spanish nationalism to build a parody of her speeches.

In 2023, she received the MTV Europe Music Award for best Spanish artist, and in 2025 she published Música para muñecas, an album in which she addressed issues such as precarity, identity, and the contradictions of contemporary life.

Anti-fascism and class awareness

Hudson has never hidden her political positions. In an interview with The Huffington Post, she explained that she identified with "Marxist and communist shades and nuances" and argued that social demands must include a class perspective.

Her criticism also extends to the commodification of causes such as feminism or LGTBI Pride. She has questioned that companies use these movements in their advertising campaigns while maintaining working conditions that she considers incompatible with the rights they say they defend.

In 2022, she even described herself on Cadena SER as "the Norma Duval of the left," a definition that sums up the mix of spectacle, provocation, and political positioning with which she has built her public persona.

That class awareness also explains her closeness to labor and neighborhood demands. For Hudson, discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation cannot be analyzed separately from economic inequalities.

A critical LGTBI activist of both the right and also the left

The defense of trans people and of sexual diversity takes a central place in her public interventions. Hudson has repeatedly denounced the use of LGTBI identities as an instrument of political confrontation and has criticized transphobic rhetoric from both conservative sectors and spaces that identify with the left.

In an interview with El Español in 2025, she expressly defined herself as a person of the left, although she also lamented the fragmentation of that political space and the disenchantment of part of its supporters.

Her relationship with the Catholic Church is another of the recurring issues in her career. Despite her criticisms of the institution and her positions on sexual diversity, she has distinguished between church hierarchy and religious freedom, which she says she defends.

Doing politics without campaigning for a party

Although her statements often have an explicitly political content, Hudson has rejected dedicating herself to institutional politics.

"No, I think my language is different," he replied when El Español asked him in 2025 whether he would accept joining a party. In that interview, he asserted the work of social centers and of neighborhood organizations as forms of political participation outside of institutions.

In 2024, he had already expressed a similar idea, when he argued that the great social achievements had come thanks to citizen mobilization and to the organization of neighborhoods and the labor movement.

His participation in the general strike of 11N connects with that way of understanding activism. This Wednesday, far from limiting himself to commenting on the call through his social networks, Hudson was among those who were protesting in the center of Madrid when the police charges took place.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What is the status of the possible judicial investigation into police charges during the general strike on November 11 in Madrid?

As of November 11, 2026, there is no public record of a formal judicial investigation being opened regarding the police charges during the general strike in Madrid. What has been confirmed is the announcement of criminal actions by CCOO Madrid and the commitment of the leaderships of CCOO and UGT to go to court. Therefore, it is important to distinguish between the intention to report the events and the existence of an already opened judicial case.

Actions announced

The general secretary of CCOO Madrid, Paloma López, has announced that the union will file a criminal action for the charges and the detention of a worker during an informational picket at Mercamadrid. According to her account, the Police prevented participants from approaching to inform about the strike and used pepper spray. The published information includes this announcement but does not confirm that the complaint or lawsuit has been filed or accepted by a court (Demócrata: CCOO announcement).

Subsequently, Unai Sordo and Pepe Álvarez, general secretaries of CCOO and UGT, announced legal actions for police interventions at various points in Madrid. Both stated they will claim "criminal and all kinds of responsibilities." This is a declaration of intent to go to court, not a communication that a judge has begun an investigation (Demócrata: legal actions).

What remains to be known

The consulted sources do not show a judicial resolution that would allow speaking of an open case. Specifically:

  • No admission of a complaint or lawsuit for these charges has been communicated.
  • There is no record of the opening of criminal proceedings, i.e., judicial actions to clarify the facts.
  • No court in charge of the matter or case number has been publicly identified.
  • There is no record that officers have been summoned as suspects nor that statements, expert reports, or other judicial evidence have been ordered.

This does not mean that some management may not have been carried out but not yet disclosed. It means that, with the public information available during this same day, the accredited status remains the announcement of legal actions.

The facts motivating the claim

The main episode cited is that of Mercamadrid. CCOO has released a report of 13 people who required medical assistance and has denounced the use of pepper spray and injuries during the intervention (Demócrata: incidents at Mercamadrid). Other information reports a union figure of 15 injured; the published counts are therefore not consistent and should not be presented as a judicially established tally.

There is also a police version regarding the detention: the Madrid Superior Police Headquarters attributes to the detainee having thrown a barrier at officers around 1:30 a.m. The unions, for their part, describe the picket as peaceful and question the intervention (Demócrata: versions of the incident).

The detention and the possible investigation of the charges are separate matters. The former does not prove that there is a case against police officers; the union announcement does not determine that a crime has been committed. The next decisive development will be to know if the criminal action is filed and what decision the judicial body that receives it adopts.

What are the powers and attributions of the National Police in dispersing demonstrations according to Spanish legislation?

The National Police can intervene to carry out the dispersal of a demonstration, but they do not have unlimited authority to disperse it. The decision must be based on a legal cause, corresponds to the competent governmental authority, and must be executed respecting fundamental rights. Their role includes protecting the peaceful exercise of the right, not only maintaining order.

1. Legal framework and protection of the right

The starting point is Article 21 of the Constitution: the right to peaceful and unarmed assembly. The Organic Law 9/1983, regulating the right of assembly, establishes that no prior authorization is needed; for demonstrations in public transit areas, notification to the governmental authority is required.

Its Article 3 obliges that authority to protect assemblies against those who intend to prevent or disturb them. Therefore, police intervention must also aim to facilitate their development and protect participants.

2. When dispersal can be ordered

Article 5 of Organic Law 9/1983 assigns to the governmental authority the suspension and, when appropriate, dispersal in four cases:

  • When the assembly or demonstration is unlawful according to criminal laws.
  • When there are public order disturbances with danger to persons or property.
  • When attendees wear paramilitary uniforms.
  • When organized by members of the Armed Forces or Civil Guard infringing the specific limitations of their respective legal regimes.

The law requires prior communication of these resolutions to attendees in the legally prescribed manner. Failure to communicate the call alone is not among these four causes: administrative non-compliance must be distinguished from justification for dispersal.

3. Who decides and what corresponds to the Police

The decision to disperse must be distinguished from its material execution. The former corresponds to the governmental authority; the National Police acts as the executing body within its competencies and under the corresponding direction. The additional provision of Organic Law 9/1983 also recognizes regional governmental authorities as such, according to their statutes and the deployment of their police forces.

Consequently, dispersal is not an exclusive attribution of the National Police. The basic principles of intervention established in the Organic Law 2/1986, of Security Forces and Corps, are common to the different bodies.

4. Limits on the use of force

Article 5 of this latter law requires consistency, timeliness, and proportionality: using appropriate means, intervening when appropriate, and not exceeding the necessary intensity. It also obliges avoiding abusive, arbitrary, or discriminatory practices and informing, as widely as possible, about the causes and purpose of the action.

The use of weapons is restricted to situations of rationally serious risk to the life or integrity of agents or third parties, or serious risk to citizen security, always subject to these principles. A dispersal order does not eliminate such limits.

5. Detentions and responsibility

Dispersal does not allow indiscriminate detentions: legal requirements, procedures, and deadlines must be met. Officers must identify themselves as such when detaining and protect the life, integrity, and dignity of persons in custody.

Finally, police officers are personally and directly responsible for actions contrary to the law, without prejudice to the patrimonial responsibility of the Administration. Obedience to a superior does not protect manifestly criminal or unlawful orders.

What is Samantha Hudson's professional and political background outside the artistic field?

Outside the artistic field, Samantha Hudson has a background focused on communication, social campaigns, and activism, rather than institutional politics. The consulted sources do not indicate that she has held public office, run for elections, or held leadership responsibilities in parties, unions, or NGOs. It is important to distinguish her involvement in public debate from a professional political career.

Professional activity: communication and awareness

Her work outside music and acting is related to content creation and presentation. She shares the podcast Bimboficadas with María Barrier, which addresses issues such as gender identity, labor precariousness, and mental health through humor and irony. This description also appears in a publication by the Pamplona City Council; it does not imply Hudson holds a municipal role.

She also co-hosted the Netflix podcast ¿Sigues ahí? with Jordi Cruz. These are communication and entertainment activities, not a profession completely separate from her cultural facet. Interviews about her beginnings and her conception of activism allow situating this continuity between media presence and social discourse (Diario de Mallorca).

A specific social collaboration is the campaign #NiMártiresNiSantas, which she conceived, created, and directed for the NGO Imagina Más. Its goal was to combat the stigma of HIV and discrimination against seropositive people. Here her contribution was creative and communicative; there is no record that she assumed the direction of the entity (interview in DEIA).

Political participation without party office

Hudson has expressed feminist, anti-capitalist, and LGTBIQ+ rights defense positions, linking them with economic inequalities. She has used the expression "Marxist and communist hues and nuances" to describe her stance and has criticized companies for using feminism or Pride as advertising while maintaining labor conditions she considers incompatible with those causes (Demócrata profile).

This does not prove party militancy. In a 2025 interview, collected by Demócrata, she rejected joining a party with the response "No, I think my language is different." Instead, she advocated social centers, neighborhood organizations, and citizen mobilization as spaces to do politics.

Her participation includes in-person protests. In October 2026, she intervened from the Puerta del Sol encampment during a connection at a Guitarricadelafuente concert to support housing mobilizations (Demócrata report). On November 11, 2026, she participated in the general strike protests in Madrid and reported having been pepper-sprayed during police charges. That complaint is her account of what happened, not a judicial resolution on the facts.

Relationship with organizations and institutions

In January 2026, she participated with Barrier in Greenflags, Greenpeace's video podcast, to reflect on hate messages and forms of collective organization. It was a guest intervention, not a position within the organization (Greenpeace statement).

She received the Rainbow Award from the Ministry of Equality in 2022 and was announced among the awardees at the 2026 Plumas Awards of FELGTBI+ (S Moda; Servimedia). The European External Action Service has also disseminated her profile as an activist. These are recognitions of her visibility and commitment, not institutional appointments.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What experience did Samantha Hudson report during the protest on Gran Vía in the general strike?

Question 1 of 3

How did Samantha Hudson begin to become publicly known?

Question 2 of 3

What is Samantha Hudson's stance regarding participation in institutional politics?

Question 3 of 3