The monographic survey by 40dB for El País and Cadena SER shows a broad consensus on a greater intervention in the housing market: 67.5% prefer to limit prices to facilitate access, even if it decreases the profitability of owners, compared to 21.7% who choose to let the market determine them. The position is majority among voters of PSOE, Sumar, and Podemos, but also among those of PP, with 56.5%, and Vox, with 55.2%.
The survey was conducted through 2,000 online interviews between September 25 and 28, at a time of special intensity in the housing debate: it began two days after the eviction of Maricarmen Abascal and ended before the Council of Ministers approved the two decrees on housing that arrive this Friday at Congress. Therefore, the study does not ask about the final text of those regulations, but about specific policies that in some cases coincide with measures later included in the decrees.
Two out of three prefer to limit prices rather than let the market act alone
40dB poses a dilemma between limiting prices to make housing more accessible, even if that reduces the profitability of owners, or allowing prices to be set solely by the market even if that may hinder access to housing.
- 67.5% lean towards the first option.
- 21.7% prefer the market to determine prices.
- The rest do not take a position.
The difference, of almost 46 points, makes public intervention the clearly majority option in the question posed by the survey.
The majority also appears among PP and Vox voters
The distribution by voting intention is one of the most striking data from the study. Among Sumar voters, support for limiting prices reaches 95.8%. Among Podemos voters, it reaches 85.4%, and among PSOE voters, it reaches 82.6%. But the position is also majority in the two main electorates of the right: it is shared by 56.5% of those who would vote for PP and 55.2% of those who would opt for Vox.
Therefore, there is a clear difference in intensity between blocks, but not in sign. In the five main electorates, more people accept limiting prices than those who prefer to leave price setting exclusively to the market.
Even 56.5% of owners who rent support limiting prices
The division is not automatically reproduced between tenants and landlords. As was to be expected, support for intervention is higher among those who live in rental housing, where it hovers around 77%. But also 56.5% of landlords who rent out some housing are in favor of limiting prices to facilitate access, even though that policy may affect their profitability. The data suggests that the debate about housing is not exclusively divided between the immediate economic interests of landlords and tenants.
Social housing is the measure with the greatest consensus: 82%
When the survey moves away from the general dilemma and asks about specific policies, even larger majorities appear. The proposal with the most support is to expand the supply of social housing, backed by 82.4% of respondents. Very close are the tax advantages for small landlords who rent their homes at affordable prices, with 79.7%. It also receives around 78% support for the public sector to promote the construction of private housing.
These results introduce an important nuance: society does not seem to be betting solely on regulating prices. There is also very broad support for increasing supply and using tax incentives to incorporate housing into the market.
Regulating rents, setting caps, and postponing evictions exceed 70%
Measures directly related to rental housing also gather broad majorities.
- 74% support postponing evictions of vulnerable people while an alternative housing solution is found.
- 73% agree with setting a limit on the annual increase of rents.
- 72% directly support regulating the price of rents.
Furthermore, according to the study, these measures receive more support than rejection not only among progressive electorates and tenants but also among voters of PP and Vox and among landlords, although with smaller margins.
Almost seven out of ten would prohibit tourist apartments in residential buildings
67.9% agree with preventing tourist apartments from existing within residential buildings. The proposal is not limited to a single political space. The intensity is again greater among left-wing voters, but support also exceeds rejection within right-wing electorates. The data is relevant because the decrees that now arrive at Congress contain measures on tourist housing, although their specific scope partly depends on the existence of areas declared as tense by the autonomous communities.
Raising taxes on vacant homes divides more
Consensus decreases when the measures directly enter the taxation of property. 51% support increasing taxes on owners of vacant homes. It remains a majority, but by a considerably smaller margin than in previous proposals. Here, a clearer political division appears. The measure has greater acceptance among left-wing voters and tenants, while it provokes majority rejection among owners and voters of PP and Vox. It is one of the points where the transversal consensus that exists, for example, around expanding social housing or fiscally incentivizing affordable rental disappears.
Only one measure does not reach 50%: limiting how many homes a person can own
The least supported proposal is to establish a limit on the number of homes that one person can have: 48% support it. It is the only one of the 12 policies proposed by 40dB that does not manage to exceed 50%. Although it receives more support than rejection among PSOE, Sumar, and Podemos voters, it does not achieve sufficient consensus among the general population. Furthermore, this measure is not part of the decrees that will be voted on this Friday in Congress.
Almost two out of three defend limiting prices in tense areas
The survey also asks about one of the main tools of the 2023 Housing Law: limiting prices in those areas declared as tense residential markets. Almost two-thirds of Spaniards consider this measure necessary. Support is again majority among left-wing voters, but also exceeds 50% among those who support right-wing parties. The effective scope of this mechanism depends, however, on the autonomous communities. Some measures of the new decree will only be applied in territories that have declared tense areas.
The Maricarmen case has reached 93% of Spaniards
The survey also measures the impact of the eviction of Maricarmen Abascal. More than 93% claim to have heard about the case. It is an extraordinarily high level of informational penetration and helps to understand the context in which the study was conducted. 61.8% believe that an elderly person should not be evicted from their home without having an alternative housing option. Approximately 32% prioritize the owner's right to dispose of their property in that scenario. Here, a more visible political gap appears: left-wing voters largely lean towards the protection of the vulnerable resident, while among PP and Vox voters, the owner's right weighs more.
Almost two-thirds support peaceful resistance to evictions
The study also asks about mobilizations aimed at preventing an eviction. Almost two out of three citizens consider peaceful resistance legitimate in an attempt to stop an eviction. The support is overwhelmingly majority among progressive voters. Among PP and Vox electorates, however, the issue is practically divided in half.
69% view negatively that Congress rejected previous housing measures
Almost 70% view negatively that Congress rejected the previous package of measures promoted by the Government to postpone certain evictions and adopt other housing actions. The negative assessment is more intense among left-wing voters and tenants; however, even among PP and Vox voters and among the owners themselves, more people view that rejection negatively than those who see it positively. This data becomes particularly relevant because this Friday, two decrees on housing return to Congress, and Junts has announced that it will vote against both.
43% primarily blame the central Government
The broad support for public intervention does not exempt the Government from responsibility for the current situation. When 40dB asks which administration should primarily take on the solution to the problem, 43.3% point to the central Government. 19.3% point to the autonomous communities and only 5.3% to the municipalities. Another part believes that the responsibility belongs equally to all. This is particularly important data because housing policy is distributed among different administrative levels, but citizens concentrate their demand for solutions fundamentally on the state Executive.
The PSOE appears first in capacity to manage housing, but “none” wins
When asked which party is most capable of addressing the problem, the PSOE occupies the first position among the political formations, with 18.5%. PP and Vox tie with 14.4%. But the most chosen response is “none,” with 22.6%. The result fits with a survey in which there is broad agreement on the seriousness of the problem and on many of its possible solutions, but a much more limited confidence in the ability of the parties to solve it.
The housing measures with the most and least support
What housing measures do Spaniards support the most, according to 40dB
The 40dB survey for El País and Cadena SER shows favorable majorities for almost all proposed measures. The greatest consensus occurs around social housing and incentives for small landlords, while limiting the number of homes a person can own is the only proposal that does not exceed 50%.
| Measure | Support |
|---|---|
| Expand the supply of social housing | 82.4% |
| Tax advantages for small landlords who rent at affordable prices | 79.7% |
| Promote private housing construction from the public sector | ≈78% |
| Postpone evictions of vulnerable people until an alternative is found | ≈74% |
| Non-payment insurance and legal assistance for landlords | ≈73% |
| Set a cap on the annual increase of rents | ≈73% |
| Regulate rental prices | ≈72% |
| Do not allow tourist apartments in residential buildings | 67.9% |
| Prohibit evictions of vulnerable people | ≈65% |
| Monthly aid to pay rent | ≈64% |
| Increase taxes on owners of vacant homes | ≈51% |
| Limit the number of homes a person can own | ≈48% |
Source: monographic survey by 40dB for El País and Cadena SER. Fieldwork conducted between September 25 and 28, 2026, through 2,000 online interviews.