Planas defends the withdrawal of the 12% of olive oil to avoid an oversupply and to protect traditional olive groves

The Minister of Agriculture claims that the immobilization of part of production is "necessary, timely and based on European law" in the face of a campaign that could reach two million tons between harvest and stocks. The Government warns that the measure must not affect the price paid by consumers and will monitor possible speculative moves

fotonoticia 20261102144040 1920

fotonoticia 20261102144040 1920

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

5 minutes

Most read

Elecciones 29N · Encuestas

La media de las encuestas

Media a 7 de noviembre de 2026 · 11 institutos

  • PP31,0 %
  • PSOE26,2 %
  • Vox19,5 %
  • Frente Amplio6,6 %
  • ERC2,4 %
  • SALF2,2 %
  • Podemos2,1 %
01020304050ene 2024jul 2024ene 2025jul 2025ene 2026jul 2026

Media del último estudio de cada instituto en 30 días y su evolución semanal desde el 23J. Partidos con al menos un 2 %.

Todas las encuestas

Elecciones generales del 29 de noviembre · Demócrata

The Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Luis Planas, defended this Saturday the Government’s decision to temporarily withdraw 12% of the production of olive oil from the current campaign from the market to contain the excess supply, stabilize prices, and protect the profitability of producers. The head of Agriculture described the intervention as “absolutely necessary, timely, and based on European law,” and said that its purpose is to prevent a particularly abundant campaign from ending up harming farmers.

The measure comes in a year in which production forecasts point to a harvest of around 1.6 million tonnes, to which are added inventories from the previous campaign of 357,000 tonnes. Taken together, the available volume comes to close to two million tonnes—an accumulation that, according to the Ministry’s assessment, makes it necessary to act to avoid imbalances between supply and demand.

Planas explained that the objective of the intervention is “to ensure that the entire sector is profitable,” with special attention to primary producers, whose margins may be put at risk when the abundance of product pushes prices down at origin. The minister defended that the withdrawal will allow commercialization to be synchronized with the evolution of the market and will provide greater stability to an activity that is especially relevant for many rural areas.

Traditional olive groves, at the center of the intervention

The head of Agriculture placed traditional olive groves as one of the main beneficiaries of the measure, as it is a production model that bears higher costs than intensive and super-intensive farms. The difference in productive structure and costs means that price drops have an especially sharp impact on traditional farms, many of them linked to municipalities whose economic activity depends to a large extent on cultivation.

“The measure is designed to provide stability to the market and to support those who need it most,” Planas said, who highlighted the importance of olive groves for maintaining economic activity and employment in rural areas.

The minister has also recalled that the intervention responds to a request forwarded by the professional farming organizations and the agri-food cooperatives. The decision is therefore intended to address a concern shared by different links in the sector about the risk that a high supply will end up undermining the profitability of farmers.

Planas made these statements during his participation in the Fiesta del Primer Aceite, held in Úbeda (Jaén), an event dedicated to promoting early oils and recognizing olive-oil-related activity. The choice of this setting has allowed the minister to defend the measure before representatives of a region especially linked to olive-oil production.

The Government cites the European framework to justify the withdrawal

The decision is implemented through a resolution of the Directorate-General for Agricultural Production and Markets, published on Friday in the Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE). Planas defended that the mechanism has legal backing both in the national legal system and in the Community framework, and he assured that its design has been preceded by an analysis of the sector’s evolution.

"It is the result of rigorous work, carried out over months, in which the olive-oil campaigns of the last 20 years have been analyzed," the minister explained, insisting that the action complies with European and national law.

The Community basis lies in the operating regulation of the Common Organisation of Markets (OCM) of the European Union, which includes instruments to intervene in situations of market imbalance and to manage scenarios of high production. This framework makes it possible to activate product immobilization mechanisms when the conditions laid down in the regulations are met.

The reference to Community law is relevant because the withdrawal is not an isolated decision by the Spanish market, but rather relies on the regulatory instruments provided for the operation of the European agricultural markets. The Executive argues that the action responds to a specific supply situation and seeks to prevent excess product from jeopardizing the economic viability of farms.

Planas warns against speculation and rules out passing the measure on to the consumer

One of the central messages from the minister has been that the immobilization of part of production must not be turned into an argument to make olive oil more expensive on supermarket shelves. Planas has asked operators not to use the intervention to justify unjustified price increases and has warned that the Executive will be on the lookout for possible speculative behavior.

The withdrawal is intended to act on the balance between supply and demand and to protect producers’ margins, not to cause an artificial increase in cost for consumers. "Let no one take advantage of this opportunity to speculate," the head of Agriculture has demanded, who has assured that the Government "will be behind to prevent it".

The message introduces a second dimension in the application of the measure. Along with the objective of stabilizing the market at origin, the Executive intends to prevent the effects of the intervention from being passed on to the marketing chain and ending up being reflected in the final price.

The evolution of quotations and the behavior of operators will therefore be relevant elements for assessing the scope of the withdrawal. The Ministry argues that the mechanism should help to sustain the sector’s profitability without generating additional distortions in the market.

China, Mercosur and India: the sector seeks to expand its markets

Beyond the regulation of domestic supply, Planas has highlighted the growth possibilities for Spanish olive oil in international markets. The minister recalled that during the past year, a little more than a million tons were commercialized abroad—an amount that reflects Spain’s weight in worldwide trade of this product.

Among the opportunities he has mentioned is the forthcoming reduction of the tariffs applied by China to olive oil, which will move from 10% to 5%. The cut may facilitate access for the Spanish product to one of the major international markets and improve the competitive conditions for exports.

Planas has also mentioned the trade agreements reached by the European Union with Mercosur and India, which open up new prospects for Community producers. The expansion of trading destinations thus appears as a complementary route to absorb Spanish production and reduce dependence on traditional markets.

Therefore, the Government’s strategy combines, a short-term intervention on supply with the search for new commercial opportunities abroad. While the withdrawal of 12% aims to prevent the abundance of the harvest from pushing prices down and harming especially traditional olive groves, the opening of markets seeks to strengthen the export capacity of a strategic sector for Spanish agriculture.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

At what parliamentary stage is the resolution on the withdrawal of 12% of olive oil, and what procedures remain for its final approval?

The withdrawal of 12% of olive oil is not pending parliamentary approval: it has already been approved and is in the administrative implementation phase. As of November 7, 2026, the resolution setting that percentage is published in the BOE and takes effect from November 6. Therefore, no vote in the Congress or review by the Senate remains for the measure to be applied.

What has been approved and by what procedure

The reference is the Resolution of November 4, 2026, from the Directorate General of Agricultural Productions and Markets, published on November 6. It establishes the temporary withdrawal from the market of 12% of the olive oil production from mills during the 2026/2027 campaign. It can be consulted in the BOE text.

This resolution develops Order APA/1145/2026, of October 29, published on October 30, which established the marketing standard for that campaign. The order set the framework and tasked the Directorate General with specifying the percentage through a resolution before November 15. That step has already been completed; it is not a pending procedure.

The distinction is important: although it is called a “resolution,” it is not a parliamentary resolution nor a bill. It is an administrative decision of the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Therefore, the news from October 30 that still spoke of waiting for the percentage described an earlier moment, surpassed by the publication on November 6, according to the Demócrata information.

What parliamentary procedures remain

None to approve this measure. It does not have to pass a period for amendments, a report from a committee, a committee opinion, nor a final vote by the Cortes. It also does not require ratification, that is, a vote in Congress to maintain a royal decree: the instrument used here is not a royal decree.

Consequently, there is no need to wait for a future “definitive parliamentary approval” to carry out the withdrawal. What continues is its execution, supervision, and possible administrative review. The fact that controversies or appeals may arise does not turn the resolution into a pending legislative initiative.

What actions remain ahead

  • Application by the mills. The 12% is calculated on the accumulated monthly production declared from November; October production is excluded. Each operator can choose the category of oil to immobilize and store it in their own or third-party facilities.
  • Storage and declarations. The oil must remain withdrawn until September 30, 2027, unless the measure is modified. Monthly production and final stocks must be reported through the Olive Oil Market Information System.
  • Administrative control. A technical group is planned to be established to approve a coordinated control plan led by the Ministry and executed by the autonomous communities. Operators must provide documentation and allow inspections.
  • Possible review. The resolution may be reviewed and modified from December 31, 2026, depending on production evolution. That date opens a possibility for review, not a mandatory second approval.

Additionally, the Balearic Government announced on November 6 that it is preparing an appeal to request that the withdrawal not be applied in the islands. This is an announced administrative challenge, not a remaining parliamentary procedure.

What are the competencies and political career of Luis Planas as Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food?

Luis Planas Puchades has been Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food since June 2018. His responsibility includes directing state agricultural, livestock, fisheries, and food policies, with a European dimension. His career combines parliamentary positions, responsibilities in Andalusia, diplomacy, and posts in European Union institutions.

Competencies as minister

At the head of the department, Planas directs these areas within the scope of the General State Administration:

  • Agriculture and livestock: production, agricultural markets, animal and plant health, modernization of farms, and support for sector profitability.
  • Common Agricultural Policy (CAP): negotiation of European rules and financing, and coordination of its application in Spain. Includes planning of aid and relations with autonomous communities.
  • Fisheries: sustainable resource management, regulation and control of fishing activity, aquaculture, and defense of Spanish interests in European and international negotiations.
  • Food: operation of the food chain, agri-food industry, quality, marketing, and promotion of Spanish foods.
  • Rural development: innovation, training, generational renewal, modernization of irrigation, and adaptation of agricultural activity to climate change.

These functions require territorial coordination and external representation: he participates in the EU Agriculture and Fisheries Council and maintains dialogue with agricultural organizations, cooperatives, and fishing representatives. The 2024 ministerial structure organizes these responsibilities through specialized bodies in agriculture, food, agricultural resources, and fisheries.

Political and professional career

Born in Valencia in 1952, he holds a law degree from the University of Valencia and is a labor inspector. His political career is linked to the PSOE. The biographies from the Ministry and La Moncloa list these main milestones:

  • Since 1982: deputy for Córdoba in Congress. Worked on constitutional, foreign, and European affairs, including Spain’s accession process to the European Communities.
  • 1986-1993: Member of the European Parliament. Vice-president of the Foreign Affairs Committee between 1987 and 1989 and of the European Socialist Group between 1991 and 1993.
  • 1993-1996: Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries of Andalusia, initially, and of the Presidency from 1994. Also served as Andalusian parliamentarian, senator by autonomous designation, and member of the Committee of the Regions.
  • 1996-2004: Chief of staff to European Commission Vice-president Manuel Marín until 1999 and later to Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs Pedro Solbes.
  • 2004-2011: Ambassador of Spain to Morocco until 2010 and permanent representative to the European Union between 2010 and 2011.
  • 2012-2013: Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Environment of the Andalusian Government.
  • 2014-2018: Secretary-General of the European Economic and Social Committee, an advisory body representing business, trade union, and civil society organizations.
Ministerial stage and recent evolution

He took office on June 7, 2018 and continued leading Agriculture in subsequent Pedro Sánchez governments. Between May 2019 and January 2020, he also temporarily assumed Territorial Policy and Public Function. He returned to Congress for Córdoba in 2019.

His mandate includes negotiating the CAP reform and the Spanish Strategic Plan, as well as the 2021 food chain reform. In September 2026, he surpassed Carlos Romero as the longest continuously serving Minister of Agriculture, according to Demócrata.

In March 2026, the Government supported his candidacy to lead the FAO, whose election is scheduled for 2027. In October, he announced he would not run again for the Congress list for Córdoba, without thereby abandoning his ministerial responsibility, according to Redacción Médica.

What legal requirements must be met to activate intervention mechanisms in the olive oil market according to European regulations?

In the European Union, intervention in the olive oil market is mainly structured through the Common Agricultural Market Organization (Single CMO) regulation, which provides crisis management mechanisms for agricultural products, including olive oil. These are not discretionary “political” decisions alone, but measures that can only be activated when certain clearly defined legal and economic requirements are met.

Broadly, the relevant mechanisms are:

  • Private storage aid (a traditional specific mechanism for olive oil).
  • Exceptional measures for serious market disturbance (applicable to the entire agricultural sector, including olive oil).
  • Limited derogations from competition rules for producer organizations in crisis situations.
1. General legal basis

The main legal framework is the EU Regulation on the Single CMO (the so-called “CMO Regulation”), complemented by Commission implementing rules. This regulation:

  • Lists the covered products (including olive oil).
  • Defines which instruments can be used (public intervention, storage aids, exceptional measures, marketing standards, etc.).
  • Sets the economic and procedural conditions to activate each instrument.
2. Private storage aid for olive oil

Private storage aid is the most specific and usual intervention mechanism for olive oil. It is not activated automatically: the Commission must adopt an implementing act after verifying that minimum conditions are met.

The main legal requirements are:

  • Eligible product and category: it must be olive oil in the categories and qualities that the CMO rules declare subsidizable (for example, certain virgin or lampante oil categories that can be temporarily withdrawn from the market).
  • Abnormal market situation: there must be a very sharp drop or downward pressure on prices, or a clear risk of serious market disturbance. In practice, the Commission relies on:
    • Price series representative of main markets.
    • Relationship between market prices and indicative reference levels set in the regulation.
    • Data on production, stocks, and trade.
  • Formal Commission decision: activation requires an implementing regulation that:
    • Justifies the existence of disturbance or risk thereof.
    • Sets the specific conditions of the aid:
      • Level of aid per ton and per day or bidding parameters.
      • Minimum storage duration.
      • Maximum volumes or allocation rules.
  • Respect for proportionality and no undue distortion: the measure must be limited to what is necessary to stabilize the market and cannot create selective advantages incompatible with competition rules or State aid rules (the aid is financed with the EU agricultural budget, not with ad hoc national aid).
  • Compliance with control obligations: operators benefiting from private storage must:
    • Formalize contracts with the competent authority.
    • Ensure real immobilization of the product during the fixed period.
    • Allow physical and documentary controls.
3. Exceptional measures for serious market disturbance

Besides storage aid, the CMO provides an “umbrella” of exceptional measures when there is a serious market disturbance or a clear threat thereof, for example due to price crises, sanitary problems, or trade restrictions.

In this case, the requirements are:

  • Recognition of a serious disturbance or serious risk thereof, supported by objective data (sharp price drops, demand collapse, export restrictions, etc.).
  • Commission decision, usually by implementing act, that:
    • Identifies the affected product (olive oil or edible oils group, as applicable).
    • Describes the disturbance and justifies the need to act.
    • Defines temporary measures (e.g., specific aids, promotion measures, relaxation of some CMO rules or controls, etc.).
  • Temporary and exceptional nature: measures must be strictly limited in time and scope, and reviewed or withdrawn once the market normalizes.
4. Limited competition derogations for producer organizations

In situations of strong imbalance, the CMO allows officially recognized producer organizations and their associations to adopt certain collective measures (e.g., temporary coordination of supply) that under normal circumstances could raise competition issues. Requirements include:

  • Existence of an officially recognized serious crisis or market disturbance.
  • Collective measures notified and authorized by the competent authority or the Commission, with limited duration.
  • Respect for the objective of stabilizing the market without eliminating competition or harming consumers.

In summary, European regulations only allow activating intervention mechanisms in the olive oil market when a current or imminent market disturbance is evidenced with data; when the Commission formally adopts justified, proportionate, and temporary measures; and when operators benefiting comply strictly with the technical and control conditions established in the CMO and its implementing rules.

Could you detail how a private storage aid campaign for olive oil works in practice (duration, bidding, controls)? What role do Spain and other Member States play in proposing or pressuring the Commission to activate these mechanisms for olive oil? How do exceptional market disturbance measures legally differ from national aids that a State may grant to the olive oil sector?

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What is the main objective of the temporary withdrawal of 12% of olive oil production?

Question 1 of 3

What legal mechanism supports the intervention to withdraw part of the olive oil production?

Question 2 of 3

Which international market will reduce its tariffs on Spanish olive oil from 10% to 5%?

Question 3 of 3