The strike against the opposition fails to paralyze economic activity at the doorstep of the 29N campaign

The employers’ associations place the follow-up below 5%, in contrast to the success claimed by the unions, while electricity consumption records a moderate decline and the Government today takes back two housing decrees rejected by the Congress.

EuropaPress 7909068 participantes piquete informativo policia nacional concentran gran via

EuropaPress 7909068 participantes piquete informativo policia nacional concentran gran via

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

14 minutes

Most read

Elecciones 29N · Encuestas

La media de las encuestas

Media a 10 de noviembre de 2026 · 15 institutos

  • PP31,5 %
  • PSOE26,8 %
  • Vox19,1 %
  • Frente Amplio6,2 %
  • ERC2,5 %
01020304050ene 2024jul 2024ene 2025jul 2025ene 2026jul 2026

Media del último estudio de cada instituto en 30 días y su evolución semanal desde el 23J. Partidos con al menos un 2 %.

Todas las encuestas

Elecciones generales del 29 de noviembre · Demócrata

The general strike this Wednesday has brought together thousands of people in demonstrations called in different Spanish cities, but it has failed to paralyze economic activity in most of the country, according to the reports provided by business organizations. CEOE and Cepyme place follow-up below 5% and describe the call as a "failure", as opposed to the "success" claimed by CCOO and UGT.

Electricity consumption data show a moderate reduction in demand during the afternoon, although it will be necessary to know the 24-hour report to determine its definitive scope. In any case, the gap between union and business estimates keeps open a war of figures about actual participation.

The call also has a singular political dimension. It is the first nationwide general strike in more than eight years during Pedro Sánchez's presidency, places housing among its main demands, and is accompanied by union criticism of opposition parties.

The Government, which has expressed its support for the demands of those calling the strike, has kept its public schedule practically empty. All of this happens on the eve of the electoral campaign on 29 November and barely 24 hours before the Standing Committee of the Congress votes two housing decrees that the Executive has once again approvedr after its previous versions were rejected by a parliamentary majority.

The war of figures: the unions talk about success and the employers about failure

The day has left two reports that are difficult to reconcile. The general secretaries of CCOO and UGT, Unai Sordo and Pepe Álvarez, have argued that the call has exceeded their expectations, especially in certain industrial sectors and territories. Both have also highlighted participation in the mobilizations called during the afternoon.

The unions have not offered a single, definitive percentage of national follow-up. Álvarez has rejected the idea of drawing up a state-wide average, considering that the differences between territories and sectors make such a calculation poorly representative. CCOO has announced that it will provide more information in the coming days.

For its part, CEOE and Cepyme have communicated that, according to the data received from their territorial, sectoral and associated organizations, the average follow-up has been below 5%. Business associations talk about historic minimums and assure that the activity has developed normally in most sectors and territories.

Both organizations acknowledge a higher incidence in certain large companies, especially industrial ones and with a high union presence. However, they consider that the stoppages have not caused a widespread interruption of production or services.

The figures come from different methodologies. The business estimates are based on the information provided by the companies and associations consulted, while unions use their own territorial and sectoral records. None of these summaries, on its own, constitutes a complete administrative count of the workers who followed the strike.

The demonstrations: 55,000 people in Barcelona, according to the Guardia Urbana

The protests had a second expression during the afternoon, with demonstrations in Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia and other capitals. The conveners defended that attendance shows social support for their demands, while business organizations have focused their summary on the activity of workplaces.

In Barcelona, the Guardia Urbana has put the attendance at the main demonstration at 55,000 people, as opposed to the 400,000 demanded by the organizers. The difference between the two counts is considerable and forces the origin of the figures to be explicitly identified.

In Madrid, the demonstration went through the center of the capital under persistent rain. The protest brought together workers, tenant organizations and social groups, with a final figure, that of the Madrid Government Delegation, which calculated 120,000 people as the number of demonstrators, far below the 600,000 announced by the conveners.

Infografía de huelgas en Madrid
Infografía de cifras de participación de huelgas generales. INFOGRAFÍA: DEMÓCRATA.

Tourism, construction and SMEs record reduced follow-up

The breakdown provided by business organizations makes it possible to identify the activities in which the call has had a lower incidence.

In tourism, the Spanish Confederation of Hotels and Tourist Accommodations (CEHAT) has described monitoring as practically nonexistent. Hotel establishments have maintained, according to the employers’ association, their usual operations, without widespread alterations to services.

Hospitality in Spain has placed participation below 2% in most provinces. Travel agencies, represented by CEAV, have also reported low monitoring.

In the Canary Islands, hotel associations have provided regional figures. The Federation of Hospitality and Tourism Employers of Las Palmas has placed participation between 4% and 5%, while Ashotel has estimated it at 0.82% during the morning shift in Santa Cruz de Tenerife.

The National Confederation of Construction has likewise described an almost zero impact of the strike on the sector. According to its estimates, fewer than 1,000 workers would have joined the stoppage in an activity that exceeds one and a half million affiliates to Social Security.

In Castilla-La Mancha, the Regional Confederation of Employers, CECAM, has placed monitoring below 5% in the private sector, based on consultations carried out with more than 2,000 companies.

Catalonia: 8% monitoring according to PIMEC

The Catalan employers’ association PIMEC has published one of the most detailed business breakdowns of the day. Its final estimate puts monitoring at 8%, based on a sample of 1,186 companies.

Retail records the highest percentage, at 15.5%, followed by construction, at 10.2%, and other services, at 8.9%. In the primary sector, participation reaches 8.2%; in hospitality and catering, 6.6%; in industry, 6.4%; and in transport and logistics, 1.5%.

PIMEC also introduces, moreover, a relevant distinction between the workers who joined the strike and the companies whose activity was affected. According to its report, 27.6% of the companies consulted recorded some reduction or interruption of activity, although 53.6% of the affected companies had no employees on strike.

Among the causes cited by the employers’ association are difficulties with mobility, incidents with suppliers and customers, and problems accessing certain workplaces. In transport and logistics, despite monitoring of 1.5%, half of the companies consulted have suffered some alteration to their activity.

In the Valencian Community, the Confederación Empresarial de la Comunitat Valenciana had communicated an initial follow-up of 2.57%, a provisional estimate that must not be confused with the final balance of the day.

Electricity consumption reflects a limited impact, although uneven throughout the day

The evolution of electricity demand has been one of the indicators used to assess the economic impact of the strike. This is a common reference in this type of call, although it does not allow directly knowing the number of workers who have stopped going to their workplaces.

At the first hour of the morning, the drop in consumption compared with Tuesday was approaching 9.5%. The difference was reduced as the day went on, until it stood at 0.25% at 14:00, according to the records shared during the day.

At 17:00, CEOE and Cepyme reported a reduction in demand of 4.7% compared with Red Eléctrica’s forecast and of 2.5% compared with Tuesday. An hour later, consumption stood at 3.73% below what was expected and 2.42% below the previous day’s figures.

These percentages must be differentiated from accumulated consumption. Red Eléctrica had communicated that, at 11:00, there was an accumulated reduction of 7.46% compared with the demand forecast for that period, with a maximum hourly drop of 15.49% between 10:00 and 11:00.

The subsequent evolution shows that the impact was not uniform throughout the day. All of the difference also cannot be attributed to the strike without taking into account factors such as weather, industrial activity, usual consumption patterns, and electricity self-consumption.

A strike for housing after eight years of socialist government

Housing has been one of the main demands of a strike held after more than eight years of Pedro Sánchez’s presidency. Since June 2018, the Executive has approved different measures regarding the real estate market, including theLaw for the Right to Housing of 2023 and subsequent extraordinary provisions regarding rent and evictions.

The call is also made after Congress rejected two housing decrees promoted by the Government. The unions have criticized the position of the parties that voted against the regulations, especially the PP and Vox, while tenant organizations have extended their reproaches to the policies developed by administrations of different political colors.

This circumstance has opened a controversy over the target of the strike. The Partido Popular argues that the mobilization has taken on an electoral character and that the trade union headquarters have directed their criticism against an opposition that has not yet accessed the Government. The conveners reject that interpretation and argue that their demands are aimed at all administrations with responsibilities in housing matters.

Feijóo questioned the call against the opposition

Alberto Núñez Feijóo had asked the unions to reconsider the strike, both because of its proximity to the elections and because of the situation created after the railway accidents in Adamuz and Urda.

At an information breakfast organized by Europa Press on November 3, the PP president defended the constitutional right to strike, but questioned that a mobilization be called with criticisms aimed at the opposition after eight years of socialist Government.

"Don't do it. They didn't do it in eight years of Government. Don't do it now, three weeks before being called to the polls. Don't do it or you'll link your image to Pedro Sánchez," the popular leader said then.

The PP has maintained this interpretation throughout the day. Its leaders consider that the call has an electoral component, while CCOO and UGT argue that the strike responds to social problems that affect workers regardless of their political preferences.

The contrast between these two positions comes at a time when housing occupies a prominent place in the electoral programs and proposals of the main parties.

The Government leaves its public agenda practically empty

The Executive has reduced its public institutional activity to the bare minimum during the strike day. Neither Pedro Sánchez nor most of his ministers have included official events in their schedules.

The exceptions have been the Minister of Foreign Affairs, José Manuel Albares, who has maintained international commitments in Brussels and Paris, and the Agriculture minister, Luis Planas, on official travel in Turkey.

Moncloa has explained that the decision responds to respect for the right to strike of workers in the ministerial departments, although it has specified that members of the Government have continued to carry out their duties in their offices.

The spokesperson for the Executive, Elma Saiz, has defended the legitimate nature of the mobilization and has called for respect for trade union organizations. The Minister of Social Rights, Pablo Bustinduy, has also expressed his support for the strike and has encouraged people to take part in it.

The Government maintains that the protest is not aimed at the Executive, but rather seeks to defend social rights. CEOE and Cepyme, for their part, have questioned whether Moncloa has supported the demands while highlighting the results of the Spanish economy.

The Government recovers two housing decrees rejected by Congress

The strike was held one day before the Congress Standing Committee examines two housing Royal Decree-Laws that the Executive has approved again after its earlier versions were rejected by parliamentary majority.

In that vote, PP, Vox, Junts and UPN added up 178 deputies opposed to the initiatives. The PNV and Coalición Canaria also rejected the second decree, relating to compensation to tenants.

After the early call for elections and the dissolution of the Cortes, the Government again approved both texts, introducing modifications. Their ratification now corresponds to the Standing Committee, which maintains certain parliamentary functions while Congress remains dissolved.

The first of the decrees brings together a broad set of measures on the housing market. Among them are the extension until 2030 of certain protections against evictions of vulnerable people without alternative housing, the extension of rental contracts until 2028, tax measures, and new conditions for property purchase operations by investment funds.

It also incorporates the "Tu Casa" mechanism, managed by the Instituto de Crédito Oficial, with loans of up to 50,000 euros for the purchase of a first home and an announced allocation of 10,000 million euros.

The second decree provides for compensation equivalent to one year of rent in certain cases in which the owner decides to end the contract once the initial legal period has elapsed.

The recovery of the rules takes place on the eve of the elections and after the Government lost its vote in the Plenary. The opposition has questioned the decision, while the Executive defends the need to maintain the measures in order to respond to the situation in the real estate market.

PNV allows the Government to dispense with Junts in the Permanent Commission

The main difference compared with the previous vote is the composition of the body that must rule on the decrees.

The Permanent Commission is made up of 69 deputies. The bloc formed by PSOE, Sumar, ERC, Bildu and Podemos brings together 34 representatives, while PP, Vox and Junts add another 34. The remaining seat corresponds to the PNV.

Basque nationalists have announced that they will support the first of the decrees and vote against the second. If the positions set out are maintained, the first rule could be ratified by 35 votes to 34, without needing Junts’ backing.

The second text, on the other hand, for now does not gather the necessary support to get past the vote.

The difference in composition between the Plenary and the Permanent Commission thus allows for a different parliamentary outcome from the one that occurred before the dissolution of the Cortes. The procedure falls within this body’s constitutional powers, although its use in these circumstances has sparked political criticism from the opposition.

The strike, on the eve of the start of the election campaign

The parliamentary vote will take place this Thursday, 12 November. Barely a few hours later, at 00.00 on Friday 13, the election campaign for the general elections of 29N will officially begin.

The coincidence places housing at the center of the political confrontation. The Government faces the start of the campaign with the possibility of ratifying one of the initiatives previously rejected by Congress, while the Partido Popular has turned Pedro Sánchez’s management in this area into one of the main arguments of its election programme.

The strike has also introduced a controversy about the relationship between union mobilization and the electoral calendar. The conveners argue that their demands are independent of the parties, while the PP considers that the protest has had the opposition as its political target.

The business balances known so far do not show a generalized paralysis of economic activity. The demonstrations, for their part, have allowed the conveners to take their demands to the streets. The electoral reach of both circumstances cannot be determined from the tracking figures for a strike.

EuropaPress 7908910 numerosas personas manifestacion huelga general convocada ela lab esk
Numerous people during the demonstration for the general strike called by ELA, LAB, ESK, Steilas, Etxalde, Hiru, Euskal Herriko Etxebizitza Sindikatuen Sarea and Etxebizitza Sindikatu Sozialistak, on 11 November 2026, in Bilbao, Biscay, Basque Country (Spain). Photo: David de Haro / Europa Press.

Barcelona: damage to shops, police charges, and arrests

At the close of this edition, the day of strike concluded with serious incidents in Barcelona, where groups of hooded people smashed shop windows of commercial establishments in the city center, carried out graffiti, and threw pyrotechnic devices against the Mossos d'Esquadra. The altercations began around 7:00 p.m., in the Passeig de Gràcia and Gran Via area, and spread toward Plaça de Catalunya, where new clashes with the Catalan police were recorded. The officers deployed riot-control units and carried out charges to disperse the groups involved. The incidents occurred after the Sindicat de Llogateres said the main demonstration was over.

Public order problems had begun during the early hours of the morning and the morning, with burning tires, blockades of access to industrial estates, and road cutoffs. In Catalonia, interruptions were recorded on the AP-7, the A-2, the C-58 and the Ronda Litoral, as well as incidents in Mercabarna, the Zona Franca and the access routes to logistics facilities. Six Mossos agents were injured lightly during an intervention on the B-23, near Molins de Rei. The figures published during the night also reported arrests related to the disturbances in Barcelona. Across Spain, the Ministry of the Interior had tallied 919 incidents and at least 52 detainees up to 17.00 hours, figures that will have to be updated with the final report.

The disturbances in Barcelona add to incidents recorded in other parts of the country, especially at the access points to Mercamadrid, where clashes took place between pickets and police officers. CCOO and UGT have questioned some police actions and announced legal actions, while business organizations have denounced coercion and obstacles to access to certain workplaces. These episodes must be distinguished from the general development of the demonstrations, in which thousands of people exercised their right to strike and assembly peacefully.

In addition, the general strike has left numerous incidents in the Basque Country, with thirteen detainees, three being investigated, and 155 people identified, according to the report released by the Ertzaintza at 13.30 hours. The disturbances were recorded in Portugalete, Vitoria, San Sebastián, Zamudio and Agurain, among other towns. The regional police have reported damage to shops and urban street furniture, burning of dumpsters, and road cutoffs using barricades. Seven officers were injured and had to receive medical assistance.

In Barakaldo, the headquarters of the Partido Popular suffered the breaking of a window pane and two young people from Nuevas Generaciones reported having been attacked by a group of hooded figures. According to the PP complaint, at around six in the afternoon several individuals threw an electric water heater at the glass of the premises. When the two young people came out to check what had happened, they received blows and insults, including "fascists". The Ertzaintza went to the scene and those affected filed a complaint. The president of the PP in Bizkaia, Amaya Fernández, condemned the events and demanded that those responsible be identified.

The PP headquarters in Vitoria was also the target of graffiti and stickers during the passage of a demonstration. For its part, the PNV reported threats against two members of its youth organization, EGI, when they were removing posters and cleaning graffiti at a batzoki in the Donostiarra neighborhood of El Antiguo. The nationalist party also reported graffiti against its headquarters in Zumaia. These incidents occurred during a day on which peaceful demonstrations were also held in the Basque capitals.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What parliamentary procedures must housing decrees voted on by the Permanent Deputation of the Congress follow?

Royal housing decree-laws follow the same parliamentary procedure as those in other matters: they must be submitted to debate and an express vote for validation or repeal. When the Congress is dissolved or its term has expired, that decision corresponds to the Permanent Deputation and does not require subsequent ratification by the new Plenary.

1. Publication and submission to Congress

The Government approves the royal decree-law as a provisional legislative provision for reasons of extraordinary and urgent necessity. Once published in the BOE, it can be included on the agenda for debate and voting: it does not have to wait for prior ordinary legislative processing.

Article 86.2 of the Constitution requires that Congress pronounce itself within thirty days following its promulgation. STC 32/2026 establishes the count in working days by application of article 90.1 of the Regulations. This deadline to decide on the decree-law should not be confused with the duration of any subsequent processing as a bill.

2. Convocation of the Permanent Deputation

The Permanent Deputation assumes these powers when Congress is dissolved or its term has ended, according to article 57 of the Congress Regulations. Its Presidency convenes it on its own initiative or at the request of two parliamentary groups or one fifth of its members.

There is an important difference: being outside the ordinary session period does not equate to being dissolved. If the legislature continues, an extraordinary Plenary can be convened to resolve the decree-law; the Permanent Deputation can request that convocation.

3. Debate and voting on the complete text

A Government member explains the reasons that required approving the decree-law. Then the groups intervene according to the rules of totality debates, that is, on the whole norm.

  • The entire decree-law is voted on: this phase does not allow negotiating and approving amendments to its articles nor validating only some measures.
  • Affirmative votes favor validation, which maintains the decree-law; negative votes favor its repeal.
  • A simple majority suffices: more favorable than opposing votes, with the attendance of the majority of the body's members to validly adopt the agreement.

These rules result from articles 58, 78, 79, and 151 of the Regulations. The housing matter does not introduce a special majority.

4. Possible processing as a bill

If the decree-law is validated, the Presidency asks if any group wishes to process it as a bill. If someone requests it, another vote is held: validating and opening legislative processing are different decisions.

If this second path is agreed upon, the urgency procedure applies and amendments can be presented to modify the content. Total amendments requesting to return the text to the Government are not admissible. Article 151.5 expressly allows the Permanent Deputation to process decree-laws issued between legislatures by this route.

Validation alone does not convert the decree-law into a parliamentary law, as explained by STC 23/1993.

5. Publication and accountability

The agreement of validation or repeal is published in the BOE. After elections, the Permanent Deputation reports to the new Plenary on the matters dealt with and decisions adopted, according to article 59: informing does not equate to requesting ratification. There is also no tacit validation: the required pronouncement is express.

What are the powers and functions of the Prime Minister regarding general strikes in Spain?

The Prime Minister directs and coordinates the political response to a general strike, but does not have a personal power to authorize it, prohibit it, or end it. His leadership role must be distinguished from decisions that correspond to the Government, the competent authorities over each service, and the courts. The fact that a strike is general does not by itself create extraordinary powers.

1. Government leadership and coordination

Within the constitutional framework, the Government directs internal policy and exercises executive functions according to the Constitution and laws. The Prime Minister leads this action and coordinates the ministers but does not automatically replace the competencies of each department. This institutional position is reflected in STC 124/2018.

In the face of a general strike, his role mainly consists of setting political orientation, coordinating governmental action, and assuming responsibility before Congress. Political dialogue with the organizers must be distinguished from administrative decisions affecting the exercise of the right.

2. Respect for the right to strike

The strike is a fundamental right of workers, recognized in article 28.2 of the Constitution. It is up to each worker to decide whether to participate, while its collective exercise also pertains to representatives and trade union organizations, as recalled by STC 130/2021.

Therefore, the Prime Minister cannot turn disagreement with a call into sufficient reason to prevent it. Restrictions require legal basis, a constitutionally legitimate purpose, and proportionality. The strike cannot be limited simply to avoid disrupting production: that disruption is part of its exercise, according to STC 80/2005.

3. Essential services and minimum services

Guaranteeing essential services allows establishing minimum services, but does not grant the Prime Minister a general and exclusive competence to set them. The decision corresponds to the competent governmental authority, considering the distribution of powers and the affected service. STC 233/1997 precisely examines that distribution.

Minimums must be justified concretely: it is not enough to invoke the public nature of the service. Also, they must ensure indispensable provisions, not reproduce its usual functioning. This is established by STC 8/1992 and STC 193/2006. Presidential coordination does not eliminate these requirements nor allow displacing autonomous competencies.

4. States of emergency: non-personal decisions

A general strike should not be confused with a situation that automatically allows activating exceptional powers. If the legal requirements for a state of emergency are met, the Government and Congress intervene according to specific procedures:

  • Alarm: declared by the Government through a decree agreed in the Council of Ministers; exceeding fifteen days requires Congress authorization. It does not allow suspending fundamental rights.
  • Exception: requires prior authorization from Congress, which determines its effects, territory, and duration.
  • Siege: declared by Congress by absolute majority, at the Government's proposal.

These procedures are set out in articles 162 to 165 of the Congress Regulations. STC 148/2021 emphasizes that measures must be indispensable and proportionate.

5. Control and responsibility

In short, the Prime Minister exercises political leadership, not unlimited power over the strike. Administrative restrictions are subject to judicial control; the Government is politically accountable before Congress. States of emergency are also subject to constitutional control, as explained by STC 83/2016.

Which political party does Unai Sordo belong to and what has been his trade union career?

There is no public record that Unai Sordo is affiliated with any political party. His proven affiliation is with Comisiones Obreras (CCOO), a trade union, not a political party. He has been its general secretary since 2017 and was re-elected in 2025 for a third and final term.

His relationship with politics

It is important to distinguish between participating in political debate, maintaining relations with parties, and formally belonging to one. Sordo regularly intervenes in labor and social matters and maintains dialogue with governments and political organizations, but this activity does not prove party affiliation. The sources consulted also do not show that he has been a deputy, senator, minister, or holder of any other elected public office.

Speculation about a possible jump to institutional politics should not be confused with party membership. On July 3, 2026, he ruled out joining a project of the Sumar parties and reiterated his intention to complete his union mandate. According to Demócrata, he stated: "my intention is to finish the mandate at CCOO." More recently, a November 9 report indicated that he had acknowledged conversations to join a political project; having those conversations does not demonstrate affiliation (interview in Demócrata).

From the wood industry to union leadership

Unai Sordo Calvo was born in Barakaldo, Bizkaia, on October 2, 1972. He holds a diploma in Social Graduate from the University of the Basque Country and initially worked in the wood industry. His path in CCOO began with union militancy before assuming leadership responsibilities. These backgrounds appear in his biographical profile and in an interview preserved by CCOO.

His career developed first in the Basque structure of the union and later in the national leadership:

  • 2000-2004: Youth of CCOO of Euskadi. In June 2000 he was elected Youth leader. He combined this role with organizational tasks in Bizkaia, in an initial stage of internal responsibilities.
  • 2004-2009: territorial responsibility in Bizkaia. He went on to lead the union's territorial work. He also participated in activities related to union elections, cadre training, and organizing campaigns.
  • 2009-2017: general secretary of CCOO of Euskadi. He was elected in January 2009, replacing Josu Onaindi. He renewed the position in 2013 with 96% of the votes and remained at the head of the Basque organization until his election to the confederal leadership.
  • 2017: arrival at the national general secretariat. He was elected at the XI Confederal Congress, held at the end of June, as successor to Ignacio Fernández Toxo. He obtained 88.8% support and assumed the highest responsibility of CCOO.
  • 2021 and 2025: re-elections. He renewed his mandate at the XII Confederal Congress in 2021. At the XIII Congress, held in June 2025, he was again elected with 96.11% support for another four years, according to the official CCOO communication.

His role at the head of CCOO

As general secretary, he has represented the union in social dialogue: negotiations with the Government and business organizations on employment, wages, pensions, and social protection. Among the processes during his tenure is the negotiation of the 2021 labor reform.

In short, the description supported by his career is that of a CCOO trade union leader, with successive responsibilities in Youth, Bizkaia, Euskadi, and the national confederation; not that of an accredited representative of a political party.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What percentage of general strike participation have CEOE and Cepyme estimated?

Question 1 of 3

Which sector had the lowest strike impact according to business organizations?

Question 2 of 3

In which city did the Urban Guard estimate 55,000 attendees at the main demonstration during the strike?

Question 3 of 3