Ayuso defends the legality of the purchase of the penthouse and accuses the PSOE of using the case in the campaign

The Community of Madrid maintains that the purchase of the penthouse is legal and attributes the investigation by the Court of Audit to the PSOE campaign.

fotonoticia 20261113153217 1920

fotonoticia 20261113153217 1920

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

1 minute

Most read

Elecciones 29N · Encuestas

La media de las encuestas

Media a 13 de noviembre de 2026 · 15 institutos

  • PP31,4 %
  • PSOE26,8 %
  • Vox19,1 %
  • Frente Amplio6,3 %
  • ERC2,4 %
01020304050ene 2024jul 2024ene 2025jul 2025ene 2026jul 2026

Media del último estudio de cada instituto en 30 días y su evolución semanal desde el 23J. Partidos con al menos un 2 %.

Todas las encuestas

Elecciones generales del 29 de noviembre · Demócrata

The Community of Madrid has reiterated that “there is nothing illegal” in the acquisition of the penthouse located on General Martínez Campos Street, in the district of Chamberí, and has pointed out that the PSOE “is in an election campaign.”

Sources from the regional Executive have expressed themselves in these terms after the Court of Audit ordered an investigation into the purchase for 6.3 million euros of a penthouse by the public company Planifica Madrid, which depends on the Community of Madrid, upon detecting indications of a possible impairment of public funds.

In a resolution, the Councillor of Accounts decides to refer the proceedings to the Court of Auditors’ Prosecution Section so that it may propose the appointment of an instructing delegate tasked with analyzing the alleged irregularities reported and assessing whether they can give rise to accounting liability.

From the regional Government they have stated that it is “a mere headline,” recalling that Planifica Madrid is dedicated “to buying offices,” and they have directly linked this matter to the election campaign context. “The PSOE has ten days of election campaign left to investigate whatever they want: there is nothing illegal,” they have stressed.

Likewise, they have advanced that they will file an appeal against the decision to designate an instructing delegate and, in contrast with the central Executive, they have emphasized that they have not “bought anti-abuse bracelets under real suspicion of corruption.”