The European sky of the future is being built with Spanish technology

Indra develops two new projects of the European SESAR program to modernize air traffic management and airport operations through next-generation platforms, automation, and artificial intelligence

EuropaPress 7551777 avion pista aterrizaje aeropuerto coruna 26 mayo 2026 coruna galicia espana

EuropaPress 7551777 avion pista aterrizaje aeropuerto coruna 26 mayo 2026 coruna galicia espana

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

7 minutes

Most read

Elecciones 29N · Encuestas

La media de las encuestas

Media a 2 de noviembre de 2026 · 16 institutos

  • PP30,5 %
  • PSOE27,4 %
  • Vox19,1 %
  • Frente Amplio6,4 %
  • ERC2,4 %
  • Podemos2,4 %
010203040ene 2024jul 2024ene 2025jul 2025ene 2026jul 2026

Media del último estudio de cada instituto en 30 días y su evolución semanal desde el 23J. Partidos con al menos un 2 %.

Todas las encuestas

Elecciones generales del 29 de noviembre · Demócrata

As Europe seeks to integrate its aerospace industry and strengthen its technological autonomy, Spain has business projects called to play a relevant role in the transformation and automation of air traffic. In this field, Indra has reinforced its commitment to innovation with two new projects of the European SESAR program, aimed at the development of next-generation platforms to modernize the management of airspace and airport operations.

The initiative is part of the community efforts to move toward the so-called European Digital Sky, a model that seeks to improve interoperability among the different national air navigation systems, increase operational capacity, and take advantage of the possibilities offered by technologies such as artificial intelligence. The goal is to move toward a more integrated management of air traffic, overcoming the current technological and operational differences among the member states.

The transformation also responds to a strategic need. Studies by the European Parliament have been warning that, although the European aerospace industry holds a prominent position on a global scale, it still needs to guarantee its strategic autonomy, ensure access to essential raw materials, and take advantage of the synergies between the civil and military spheres.

In the field of aviation, the MEPs of the Transport Committee have recognized the opportunities offered by new technologies and advanced air traffic management concepts to strengthen European competitiveness. In one of its reports, consulted by Demócrata, the European Parliament notes that public investment can help materialize these advantages. It also points to the possibility of adapting regulatory frameworks to facilitate that the benefits of artificial intelligence extend to the sector as a whole in a safe manner.

Flag of the European Union in front of the European Parliament building in Brussels LAURIE DIEFFEMBACQ
Flag of the European Union in front of the European Parliament building in Brussels LAURIE DIEFFEMBACQ -

In this context, Indra seeks to transfer technological advances from the research stages to their effective application in air navigation systems. The company has a consolidated track record in the SESAR program, in which it has participated since 2007, and has completed 21 innovation projects during the latest phase, corresponding to Wave 1 of SESAR 3.

The Director of Innovation and iTEC Collaboration of Air Traffic at Indra, Óscar López, explains to Demócrata that the company’s strategy is based precisely on applied innovation. In fact, he assures that more than 90% of the investment made in the previous development phase has already been incorporated into its commercial products. "All the innovation we have done in the past has been incorporated into our current systems and is available to our customers," he notes.

Now, the focus shifts toward the technologies that will have to shape the next generation of solutions for air traffic management. That is where Artemisa and NEURON come into play, two projects that address, from complementary perspectives, the modernization of en-route control platforms and airport operations.

Indra’s starting position is also one of its main assets. The company supplies systems to more than 30% of the world’s flight information regions (FIR), while more than 90% of the world’s passengers use some of its technologies at some point during their air travel. "Indra is already a world leader and Europe has technological sovereignty in this market. What we have to do is make sure we maintain and strengthen it for the future," López maintains.

Artemisa and supervised automation

On the one hand, the Artemisa project will develop a new generation of platforms for air traffic management, with the purpose of increasing interoperability and facilitating the evolution of current systems. To do this, it will work on an open, service-oriented architecture, which will make it possible to incorporate new capabilities and improve the secure exchange of information between different systems.

One of its main pillars will be to move toward automation level four, through which systems will be able to execute certain decisions autonomously in routine operational situations, always under previously defined conditions and with human supervision. López clarifies, however, that this advance does not mean that machines will take control of operations. "Automation, as it is currently set out, is supervised. The system does not make decisions on its own. It is the controller, the pilot or the tower controller who always makes the final decision," he explains.

The approach responds to the concept of collaboration between people and machines (human-machine teaming), in which technological systems provide information, detect possible conflicts and propose optimization alternatives, while the professional retains decision-making capacity. Artificial intelligence already makes it possible to develop some of these support functions, such as the solutions driven by Indra in the Jarvis project, which generate proposals to improve the management of operations.

Dozens of people pass through T4 of Adolfo Suárez Madrid-Barajas Airport, in Madrid (Spain). Carlos Luján - Europa Press
Dozens of people pass through T4 of Adolfo Suárez Madrid-Barajas Airport, in Madrid (Spain). Carlos Luján - Europa Press -

Security constitutes, in any case, an indispensable condition for incorporating these capabilities. The person responsible at Indra underscores that any technological advance must guarantee continuity of service throughout all phases of implementation, including the transition between systems. "The systems are not turned off and a week is waited for the next one to work, but rather there has to be continuous and uninterrupted operation," he summarizes.

This requirement also explains the importance of advancing progressively in a sector in which operational safety is a priority. The adoption of new technologies must guarantee that protection levels are maintained both in the current system and in the future, without compromising the provision of the service during the transformation process.

NEURON brings artificial intelligence to airports

The second project, NEURON, focuses on the transformation of the management of airport operations through new digital tools. Among its development lines are the optimization of aircraft taxiing, the monitoring of surface movements, the incorporation of visual intelligence into digital towers and the joint planning of operations.

In this case, artificial intelligence will make it possible to develop more predictable and efficient operations, with potential to reduce consumption and emissions, in addition to reinforcing security in the airport environment.

The application of these technologies does not stem solely from experimental scenarios. Indra already has digital tower solutions that incorporate artificial intelligence algorithms to identify aircraft and provide additional information to controllers. Through screens that reproduce the airport environment using cameras, the system detects movements on the ground and presents contextual information about flights, such as their identification and characteristics.

These are support tools that allow the professional to have a more complete view of what is happening at the airport. López notes that these applications, as they are complementary and do not replace human decision-making capacity, are already available on the market.

The regulatory framework, however, still has to evolve to keep pace with the incorporation of these technologies. The person responsible at Indra acknowledges that the standardization of systems based on artificial intelligence and the procedures for their certification are not fully defined. In this process, the company collaborates with the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in the development of standards and of the so-called means of compliance (means of compliance), which will make it possible to establish how the safety requirements of these solutions must be accredited.

A European model with international alliances

Beyond the specific technological developments, the two projects are part of a broader community strategy to reduce the fragmentation of European airspace. The coexistence of different national systems and operational procedures constitutes one of the obstacles to moving toward more integrated management.

In this sense, Artemisa will help lay the technological foundations of next-generation systems, although López points out that progress toward a common model also depends on alliances between providers and air navigation service providers. The project is linked to the iTEC system, which Indra supplies as the technological partner of an alliance made up of seven of the main European air navigation service providers, as well as Canada. This cooperation makes it possible to steer developments toward shared operational needs and facilitate the evolution toward interoperable solutions.

The international dimension is especially relevant for a company that already has a significant presence in the global market. López argues that Europe has a consolidated technological position in air traffic management, unlike other strategic sectors in which external dependence is greater. The challenge, therefore, is not only to achieve that autonomy, but to preserve and strengthen an industrial and technological capability that already exists.

The European Commissioner for Defence and Space, Andrius Kubilius, takes part in the EU Conference on Space Access. Solvay Library, Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION
The European Commissioner for Defence and Space, Andrius Kubilius, takes part in the EU Conference on Space Access. Solvay Library, Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION -

To this end, the community schedule includes different stages of modernization. The Union has already approved the first Common Project (CP1), which established a series of technological improvements for the air traffic management system. In addition, the European Air Traffic Management Master Plan sets the sector’s long-term vision and serves as a reference for the next developments.

Indra is also working on defining the next package of measures, Common Project 2 (CP2), which will have to specify the technologies whose deployment will be required in the coming years. These include the new service provision model toward which Artemisa is oriented and the artificial intelligence applications linked to NEURON. The roadmap points to a horizon between 2035 and 2040, when a large part of these transformations must materialize. For López, the strategic framework is already defined and the next step is to ensure that the planned initiatives and their associated funding are translated into effective projects.

International collaboration is also part of that strategy. Indra highlights the role of its Canadian partners, whose shared vision it considers fundamental to steer developments toward the real needs of the sector. The objective is for innovation not to remain in the laboratory, but to end up being incorporated into operational systems capable of responding to the demands of an industry that needs to increase its efficiency without compromising safety.

With Artemisa and NEURON, the company is precisely seeking to consolidate its position in the next generation of air traffic management systems, transferring decades of operational experience to new digital platforms and, at the same time, strengthening European technological capacity in a strategic sector.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

At what stage of processing is the adaptation of the European regulatory framework for the incorporation of artificial intelligence in air traffic management?

As of November 3, 2026, the adaptation of the European framework to incorporate artificial intelligence into air traffic management is in the technical and sectoral regulatory development phase. It is not a single regulation pending approval: the general bases already exist, but standards and procedures that will allow the safety of these applications to be accredited are still being developed.

What is approved and what is missing

The European Artificial Intelligence Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, came into force on August 1, 2024. It constitutes the horizontal framework but does not replace certification, operational approval, or aeronautical supervision. Its fit in aviation must be coordinated with Regulation (EU) 2018/1139, the basis of the competencies of the European Union Aviation Safety Agency, EASA.

The revised Single European Sky framework is also approved, articulated through Regulation (EU) 2024/2803. Its function is to improve the organization, integration, and performance of air traffic; it does not constitute a specific authorization to use AI. The Commission describes this modernization as an effort of harmonization, interoperability, and certification, according to its communication on Europe for Aviation.

Where EASA's work stands

The most relevant phase for your question is the development of EASA's technical rules and criteria. The agency is moving from conceptual documents and guidelines to specifications to demonstrate that an AI is reliable and safe. The main identified milestones are:

  • AI Concept Paper, second edition: published in March 2024, develops criteria on explainability, learning, and collaboration between people and systems.
  • NPA 2025-07: published on November 10, 2025, proposes specifications on AI reliability in aviation. An NPA is an EASA proposal subject to participation and review, not a definitive standard.
  • AI Concept Paper, third edition: proposal published on June 3, 2026, to consolidate this technical framework.
  • RMT.0742: formal regulatory development task on AI reliability, initially focused on supervised machine learning and certain applications of assistance and human collaboration.

These works are described in the EASA presentation to ICAO. The consulted schedule places new milestones for RMT.0742 in the second quarter of 2027 and a new roadmap in the first quarter of 2028. These are work forecasts, not general AI authorization dates, according to the EASA planning document.

What it means for air traffic control

The practical consequence is that a complete regime for all advanced AI applications in air traffic management is not yet closed. How to accredit their safety, what human supervision they require, and how to integrate them without compromising service continuity must be specified.

Information published today by Demócrata confirms this point: Indra acknowledges that standardization and certification procedures are not fully defined and that it collaborates with EASA on standards and means of compliance, that is, methods to demonstrate that safety requirements are met.

In parallel, SESAR develops and validates technological solutions. The first Common Project, CP1, is approved; the next, CP2, is still being defined. Validating a technology in SESAR does not equate to authorizing its operational use: it must meet applicable aeronautical requirements. In summary, the current phase is one of regulatory and certification specification, based on an already existing legal framework.

What are the competencies and powers of the director of Innovation and iTEC Collaboration of Air Traffic at Indra according to the company's organizational structure?

The director of Innovation and iTEC Collaboration of Air Traffic at Indra has a role of technological leadership, innovation, and alliance coordination within the air traffic management business. The consulted sources identify the person responsible as Óscar López Otero, although they use different titles for his position. They allow describing his functional scope but do not provide a complete organizational chart or a formal delegation of powers detailing his signing, budget, or contracting faculties.

Fit within Indra's organization

The position is located in Indra Air Traffic, the specialized activity in air traffic management systems, known by the acronym ATM. The corporate profile of López Otero presents him as director of iTEC, Avinor, and Innovation; his professional profile expands the scope to iTEC, SkyNex, Norway, and innovation, including SESAR, the European air traffic management modernization program.

Meanwhile, Demócrata, November 3, 2026, uses exactly the designation "director of Innovation and iTEC Collaboration of Air Traffic at Indra." These references describe a specialized managerial responsibility; they do not allow establishing a specific nominal hierarchical dependency.

Main competencies and responsibilities
  • Coordinate collaboration with iTEC. He leads Indra's relationship with the alliance and participates in its collaboration steering committee. His task connects the company's technological contribution with the shared needs of air navigation service providers.
  • Guide innovation towards usable products. His scope includes ATM innovation and participation in SESAR. In the Demócrata interview, he explains that more than 90% of the investment from the previous development phase had already been incorporated into commercial products. The transfer from research to systems available to customers is, therefore, a core axis of his function.
  • Drive technological evolution. Professional references include responsibility over iTEC SkyNex and other automation programs. In his statements, he addresses open architectures, interoperability, artificial intelligence, and supervised automation, as well as their progressive incorporation without interrupting service or compromising operational safety.
  • Articulate sector cooperation. His professional profile includes participation in iTEC, EUROCAE, and ASD ATM bodies, as well as dialogue with clients, industrial partners, suppliers, and European institutions. The interview also describes Indra's collaboration with EASA on standards and safety accreditation; this does not equate to personally attributing certification powers.
  • Contribute to business and negotiation. His published career includes commercial development of iTEC and iNM, coordination of teams and objectives, and executive negotiation with clients and partners. These are documented professional responsibilities but do not prove that all remain integrated, with the same scope, in the current job title.
Limits of his powers

It is important to distinguish this position from the direction of the iTEC Alliance. According to the Indra statement, Marcel Bakker was appointed director of the alliance by its board. That function coordinates the joint organization of its members; López Otero acts from Indra, its technological partner.

Consequently, the accredited scope of the position is business and technological: coordinating collaboration, innovation, and evolution of solutions. The consulted sources do not show a formal attribution to approve investments unilaterally, legally commit Indra, direct all Air Traffic, or decide for air navigation providers. His innovation responsibilities should also not be confused with public functions of regulation, certification, or operational traffic control.

What legal requirements must supervised automation systems meet to be implemented in air navigation services in Europe?

Supervised automation systems can be implemented in European air navigation services if it is demonstrated that their integration is safe, that human supervision is effective, and that they comply with applicable conformity and control procedures. It is not enough for the manufacturer to declare the software safe: technology, procedures, and personnel must be evaluated jointly. The following explanation focuses on the European Union framework.

1. Legal framework and provider responsibility

The basis is Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 on aviation safety, and Implementing Regulation 2017/373, which establishes requirements for air traffic management and air navigation service providers —ATM/ANS— and their supervision.

The service provider must maintain its management system, control risks, and ensure personnel competence. Purchasing a certified tool or contracting its maintenance does not transfer regulatory responsibility to the manufacturer for its integration and operational use.

2. Safety assessment of the change

The incorporation must be treated as a modification of the functional system when it affects service provision. The scope of requirements depends on the function and risk: informing the controller is not equivalent to recommending separations or automatically executing actions.

The assessment must identify hazards, justify acceptance criteria, and demonstrate that mitigation measures are sufficient. It must cover:

  • Software, equipment, data, procedures, and human factors.
  • Interfaces and interaction with systems that are not modified.
  • Normal, degraded, and emergency operation.
  • Service continuity and risks during transition.
3. Human supervision and training

The presence of a controller alone does not prove adequate supervision. Automated tasks, decisions reserved for the professional, actions requiring confirmation, and conditions for intervention or disconnection must be defined.

The safety demonstration must verify that the operator understands the system state, detects errors, and has sufficient time to act. It must also assess workload, situational awareness, overreliance on recommendations, and maintenance of skills. Training and procedures must be adapted before commissioning.

4. Technical conformity and operational validation

It is necessary to distinguish equipment conformity, change acceptance, and service provision in a specific environment. Documentation must include functional and safety requirements, usage limits, architecture, configuration management, and compliance tests.

Verification checks that the system meets its specifications; validation demonstrates that it serves the intended operation. Representative scenarios, failures, incorrect data, communication loss, interoperability, and recovery must be tested. In remote towers, image quality, latency, coverage, and situational awareness are especially important; in area control, predictions, alerts, and coordination.

5. Cybersecurity, changes, and monitoring

Vulnerabilities that may affect operational safety must be managed, access and versions controlled, and contingency procedures maintained. After deployment, obligations for monitoring, incident reporting, and correction of unsafe conditions continue.

If machine learning exists, the technical justification must address training and test data, scenario coverage, model limits, and subsequent modifications. These evidences help demonstrate safety; they do not constitute, by themselves, an independent authorization.

6. Authority intervention and guidance value

The provider must follow notification, review, and approval procedures before the competent authority: not all changes require the same administrative intervention. The EASA rules and guidance facilitate compliance demonstration.

SESAR and EUROCONTROL concepts do not replace binding obligations. Also, as Demócrata on supervised automation notes, specific AI certification standards and means are still evolving: participating in an experimental project does not automatically enable operational exploitation.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What is the main objective of the Artemisa project led by Indra?

Question 1 of 3

What technological capability does Indra highlight in airport management according to the NEURON project?

Question 2 of 3

Since what year has Indra participated in the European SESAR program?

Question 3 of 3