The communities of the PP and Canarias halt the Government's Inclusive Education Plan

The Education plan proposes to strengthen ordinary centers with more professionals and resources and to progressively convert special education ones into support spaces. The PP communities and Canarias reject it due to a lack of an economic report.

5 minutes

fotonoticia 20260916141900 1920

fotonoticia 20260916141900 1920

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

5 minutes

Most read

The Strategic Plan for Inclusive Education promoted by the Ministry of Education did not receive the support of the Sectorial Conference this Friday. The eleven communities governed by the PP and the Canary Islands voted against, while the four autonomous communities presided over by the PSOE, the Basque Country, and the Ministry itself supported it.

The rejection opens a new dispute between the Government and a good part of the communities over a strategy that aims to progressively transform the educational attention of students with specific needs. The project proposes that the ordinary school becomes the reference for enrolling students with disabilities and autism and that special education centers evolve mainly towards support, advice, and reference functions for the ordinary system.

The Ministry maintains that the plan does not imply the closure of these centers and that it must be developed later through a action plan with specific measures, funding, and deadlines. The autonomous communities opposed to the document, however, question precisely that they have been asked to support the framework without having that economic report yet.

The PP demands an economic report and the Ministry speaks of "partisan strategy"

Funding has become the center of the confrontation. The communities governed by the PP argue that the document does not include an economic report that determines how much it will cost to implement the measures and how they will be financed.

The Education Counselor of Cantabria, Sergio Silva Fernández, has demanded that the Government assume a financial commitment to prevent state decisions from impacting the autonomous budgets.

The Secretary of State for Education, Abelardo de la Rosa, has rejected this argument and defended that the economic report will arrive at a later stage. In his opinion, the document submitted this Friday to the communities constitutes the "conceptual framework" on which the rules and funding must subsequently be developed.

De la Rosa has attributed the result to political reasons. "Surprisingly, it has been rejected by the autonomous communities where the PP governs," he stated before lamenting that, in the Ministry's view, a "ideological position" and a "partisan strategy" have prevented the common framework from being approved.

The Secretary of State has also made it clear that Education intends to move forward despite the result of the Sectorial: "The rejection of the autonomous communities will not prevent us from continuing with the work".

The future of 45,000 special education students

One of the central points of the plan affects the 45,725 students with disabilities or autism who, according to the latest official data collected in the document, are currently studying in special education centers or in specific classrooms within regular centers. They represent approximately 14% of this student body, while the remaining 86% is already enrolled in regular centers.

The strategy proposes to gradually move towards greater enrollment in regular centers, although it introduces a caveat for students who need "highly specialized attention".

Special education centers would gradually act "mainly as reference, advisory, and support centers for the regular system", so that their professionals and resources contribute to attending to students with disabilities in regular schools and institutes.

The plan itself acknowledges that this change requires additional resources: more teachers, reduction of ratios, stability of staff, specific training, and new professional profiles, in addition to more coordination time between teams. The Ministry officially defines the plan as a framework to advance towards an inclusive system and improve, among other aspects, the provision of resources, teacher training, and accessibility.

Madrid and Castilla y León fear that family choice will be limited

The controversy is not limited to economic cost. Some PP communities believe that the model may end up restricting the possibility for families to choose between regular and special education.

Sources from the Community of Madrid have defended their "firm commitment to Special Education and the freedom of choice for families" and assert that they understand that the goal of the plan is to end the current model.

Castilla y León also believes that the proposal may "restrict the freedom of families." The Junta maintains that inclusive education and Special Education are compatible and argues that each student should receive the support that best suits their needs, both in a regular center and in a specific one.

The Ministry holds a different interpretation. The document states that an inclusive system should not force families to choose between receiving specialized support and participating in a common educational environment, but rather guarantee both possibilities simultaneously.

Psychologists, physiotherapists, or school nursing

The proposed transformation is not limited to the place where students study. The document proposes to incorporate or strengthen in ordinary schools new professional profiles to address a greater diversity of needs.

Among them are professionals in education and social integration, intercultural mediation, special education assistants, sign language interpreters, speech therapy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, educational psychology, or school nursing. They could work directly in the centers or through external services coordinated with teachers and guidance teams.

Changes are also proposed in the organization of classrooms, with tools such as co-teaching —two teachers working simultaneously—, flexible groupings, and Universal Design for Learning, in addition to reviewing psychopedagogical assessment to identify the barriers each student encounters and determine the necessary supports.

The strategy also proposes a balanced distribution of students with needs between public and private schools and the creation of an inclusive education observatory with common indicators for all communities.

There is agreement to distribute 31.3 million for Vocational Training

The division over inclusive education has not been transferred to all matters addressed in the meeting. The Sectorial Conference has indeed given the green light to the distribution of 31.3 million euros among the autonomous communities to promote Vocational Training, with the backing of all autonomous regions.

The Ministry has also informed the communities of the work to modify the royal decree aimed at reducing ratios in Early Childhood, Primary, and Secondary Education. The PP communities have questioned the proposal, which they describe as "a botch job" and "unfeasible," and demand state funding to implement the new requirements.

The meeting has taken place just a few days after the latest results of PISA were made known, which have also been part of the debate despite not being initially on the agenda. The communities have focused on the deterioration of the results, while Education maintains that the decline also affects other countries and points to reading comprehension as one of the priority areas for improvement.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What is the parliamentary procedure required for the final approval of a state strategic plan in education?

In the Spanish legal system, there is no specific "unique parliamentary procedure" for approving a state strategic plan in education. The decisive factor is whether the plan is structured as a political or programmatic document of the Government, subject only to parliamentary oversight, or if it requires a law with the rank of law (ordinary or organic) to deploy its effects. Depending on this, the role of the Cortes Generales and the procedural path change substantially.

a) Plan approved by the Government and subject to the control of the Cortes

It is most common for a strategic plan (for example, on educational digitalization, reducing school dropout, or strengthening vocational training) to be approved as a Council of Ministers agreement or as a government strategy, without the rank of law. In this case:

  • The Government drafts the plan, approves it in the Council of Ministers, and usually sends it to the Congress of Deputies and the Senate for their information, sending the document and an explanatory report.
  • The Chambers' Boards qualify it and send it to the competent committee (in this field, the Education and Vocational Training committee or equivalent), which may organize:
    • Appearances by the minister or senior officials to explain the plan.
    • Monographic debates in committee.
  • From these debates, non-legislative motions (PNL) or motions may arise, presented by parliamentary groups. These initiatives:
    • Will be debated and voted on in committee or in Plenary.
    • Have a non-normative character: they set the position of the Chamber and urge the Government to act, modify, or develop the plan, but do not create or reform laws.
  • The result may be a parliamentary resolution that:
    • “Acknowledges” the plan.
    • Politically endorses it (majority support).
    • Or expresses criticisms and recommendations, urging the Executive to review it.

In this scenario, Parliament does not “legally approve” the plan (because it is already approved by the Government), but exercises its functions of political control and guidance. The effectiveness of the plan derives from the Executive's act, not from the parliamentary agreement.

b) Plan that requires a law with the rank of law (ordinary or organic)

If the strategic plan involves structural changes affecting the legal regulation of the educational system (for example, modifying the LOE/LOMLOE, defining basic rights and duties, core aspects of freedom of education, etc.), it will be necessary to process a law, often organic, because education is linked to fundamental rights.

In that case, the content of the plan is incorporated, totally or partially, into:

  • A government bill, or
  • A private member's bill from one or more parliamentary groups.

The essential phases of the legislative procedure are, schematically:

  • Initiative:
    • The Government approves in the Council of Ministers a bill that legally embodies the plan and sends it to Congress.
    • Or a parliamentary group, the Senate, or an autonomous assembly presents a private member's bill that develops the plan, subject to consideration by the Plenary of Congress.
  • Admission for processing and referral to the Education committee, with the opening of a deadline for amendments from groups (to the whole and to the articles).
  • General debate in the Plenary of Congress, where the general orientation of the text (and, in practice, of the strategic plan itself) is discussed.
  • Processing in committee: detailed discussion of amendments, drafting and approval of a report. Many specific elements of the plan (timelines, financing, programs, indicators, etc.) are negotiated here.
  • Debate and vote in the Plenary of Congress on the report and remaining amendments. If the law is organic, the provisions affecting matters of article 81 CE require an absolute majority in a final overall vote.
  • Sending to the Senate, where a similar scheme is repeated (amendments and, eventually, veto). If the Senate amends or vetoes, Congress decides ultimately: it can accept amendments or override the veto with constitutional majorities.
  • Sanction and promulgation by the King and publication in the BOE. Only at this moment does the legal framework developing the plan acquire validity and binding force.

In summary, an educational strategic plan can remain at the programmatic and political level, with parliamentary control based on debates, PNLs, and resolutions, or be transformed into a law with the rank of law, subject to the full legislative procedure (Congress–Senate–BOE). Only in this second case can there be a proper “final parliamentary approval” with legally binding effects on the educational system.

What legal competences do the regional education ministers have in implementing state educational strategies?

The regional education ministers are the highest political authorities of the “educational administration” in each autonomous community and, therefore, responsible for specifying and implementing in their territory the state educational strategies established by basic legislation (Constitution, LODE, LOE/LOMLOE, and basic royal decrees). Their scope of action is broad, but always within the framework of the state minimums and the limits of article 27 CE (right to education and freedom of teaching) and article 149.1.30.a CE (state competence over titles and bases of the educational system).

1. Basic constitutional and legal framework

The Spanish Constitution:

  • In article 27 recognizes the right to education, freedom of teaching, general programming of education by public authorities, and participation of the educational community.
  • In article 149.1.30.a reserves to the State the regulation of the conditions for obtaining, issuing, and homologating academic and professional titles and the basic norms for the development of article 27, “to guarantee compliance with the obligations of public authorities in this matter.”

On this basis, the Organic Law 8/1985, regulating the Right to Education (LODE), the Organic Law 2/2006 on Education (LOE) and its reform by the LOMLOE define a distribution in which:

  • The State sets the basic framework: system structure, minimum teachings, basic equality conditions, title regime, general evaluations, etc.
  • The autonomous communities assume the competence of normative development and execution of education in their scope, except in the small territory of direct management by the Ministry.
2. Competences of normative development

Based on the basic state regulations (for example, the royal decrees of minimum teachings that develop the LOE/LOMLOE), the regional ministers:

  • Promote regional education laws and regulatory norms (curriculum decrees, evaluation orders, admission, attention to diversity, languages, etc.).
  • Complete the curriculum set by the State, adding up to a percentage of hours and contents, always respecting common teachings and state objectives.
  • Regulate the organization of centers, school day, offer of electives, own programs (bilingualism, innovation, digitalization), or the linguistic regime within the constitutional and basic state framework.
3. Planning and programming of education

The LODE establishes that the right to education is guaranteed through a general programming of education, in which the State and autonomous communities participate. In this area, the ministers:

  • Define the territorial planning of the network of centers (school map, districts and zones where to create or suppress public and chartered units and centers).
  • Approve regional plans to apply state strategies (for example, school success plans, digitalization, inclusion, coeducation), adapting objectives and means to their territory's context.
  • Decide the distribution of human and material resources linked to state or European programs, respecting basic criteria and state financing agreements.
4. Administrative management of educational policy

As heads of the regional department, the ministers direct all ordinary management of educational policy:

  • Creation, transformation, and suppression of public centers; authorization and chartering of private centers, within the basic framework of the LODE and LOE.
  • Management of non-university teaching staff (calls, transfer contests, training, staff organization), respecting the basic state regulations on public function and teaching bodies.
  • Call and management of certain scholarships and aids, as well as execution of state and European funds conditioned to common strategies.
  • Formalization of contracts, agreements, and cooperation programs with local entities, universities, or other actors to develop state strategies.
5. Inspection, evaluation, and supervision

Organic legislation and constitutional jurisprudence recognize:

  • The existence of a regional educational inspection, under the authority of the minister, which supervises compliance with basic and regional regulations, application of minimum curricula, quality conditions, and rights of students and families.
  • The regional competence to organize and carry out their own internal evaluations and to manage their part in the general evaluations that the State establishes to guarantee comparability and basic equality.
6. Coordination with the General State Administration

The LODE foresees a Conference of Education Ministers, chaired by the minister, which meets to ensure coordination of educational policy and information exchange. Additionally:

  • The ministers participate directly or indirectly in state bodies such as the State School Council, where they are informed and advised on the general programming of education and basic norms.
  • They negotiate in sectoral conferences the implementation of state strategies (for example, digitalization plans, educational reinforcement, or vocational training) and the distribution of funds linked to these strategies.
7. Margins of adaptation and limits

In implementing state strategies, the regional ministers:

  • Can expand minimums (more hours, more resources, additional measures) and modulate the organization of teachings, but cannot lower the basic standards set by the State nor alter the value of titles.
  • Must always respect the essential content of the right to education, freedom of teaching, and equality of opportunities of article 27 CE.
  • Cannot enact norms or practices that contradict the state bases regarding minimum curriculum, general evaluations, titles, or basic equality conditions, under penalty of competence invasion subject to control by the Constitutional Court.

In summary, the regional education ministers are the main territorial executors and adapters of state educational strategies: they have broad scope to develop, specify, and strengthen them, but always within the common framework set by the Constitution and the State's basic organic legislation.

What have been the results of the latest regional elections in communities governed by the Popular Party?

In the autonomous communities currently governed by the Popular Party, the latest regional elections have confirmed a very favorable map for the PP, with clear victories in votes and, in many cases, absolute majorities or large majorities with Vox support. Based on the sources consulted, the most relevant results can be summarized as follows.

Andalusia

In the Andalusian elections of May 17, 2026, the PP renewed the regional government with a decisive result. According to the official note from the Junta de Andalucía, with 99.94% counted:

  • PP-A: 53 of 109 seats, with 41.58% of the votes.
  • PSOE-A: 28 seats, 22.72% of the votes.
  • Vox: 15 seats, 13.82%.
  • Adelante Andalucía: 8 seats, 9.62%.
  • Por Andalucía: 5 seats, 6.31%.

Source: official note from the Junta de Andalucía on the electoral result, available at Government of Andalusia.

Castile and León

In the 2026 regional elections in Castile and León, the PP was again the most voted party, but without an absolute majority. With 99.33% of the count, the official summary of results collected by Demócrata is:

  • PP: 33 deputies, 35.47% of the vote.
  • PSOE: 30 deputies, 30.74%.
  • Vox: 14 deputies, 18.92%.
  • UPL: 3 deputies, 4.35%.
  • XAV: 1 deputy, 0.91%.
  • SY: 1 deputy, 0.70%.

The absolute majority is set at 42 seats, so the PP needs Vox's support to sustain the regional government. Source: Demócrata's special results, Castile and León 2026 election results.

Extremadura

In Extremadura, governed by María Guardiola (PP), the 2025 regional elections meant a clear victory for the PP against the PSOE, with a strong rise of Vox. In the results summary collected by Demócrata it is indicated:

  • PP: 29 seats (one more than in 2023), with 43.11% of the vote.
  • PSOE: 18 seats (10 less than in 2023), with 25.79%.
  • Vox: 11 seats (from 5), with 16.90%.
  • Unidas por Extremadura (UPEX): 7 seats (from 4), with 10.25%.

Source: Demócrata's results analysis, “Guardiola wins the elections in Extremadura…”.

Other communities governed by the PP

In other communities where the PP governs, we do not have in these sources the complete breakdown of seats by party, but we do have the vote percentages obtained by the popular candidates in the latest regional elections, which help understand the magnitude of their victories. In a ranking cited by Demócrata about the PP regional presidents, these data are collected:

  • Galicia (Alfonso Rueda, 2024 elections): PP 47.4% of the votes.
  • Community of Madrid (Isabel Díaz Ayuso, 2023 elections): PP 47.3% of the votes.
  • La Rioja (Gonzalo Capellán, 2023): PP 45.4%.
  • Region of Murcia (Fernando López Miras, 2023): PP 43.0%.
  • Balearic Islands (Marga Prohens, 2023): PP 35.8%.
  • Cantabria (María José Sáenz de Buruaga, 2023): PP 35.8%.
  • Valencian Community (Carlos Mazón, 2023): PP 35.1%.
  • Aragon (Jorge Azcón, 2026): PP 34.3%.
  • Andalusia (Juanma Moreno, 2026): PP 41.5% (overall PP figure in that citation, consistent with the official 41.58%).
  • Extremadura (María Guardiola, 2025): PP 43.2% (very close to the 43.11% counted).
  • Castile and León (Alfonso Fernández Mañueco, 2026): PP 35.5% (in line with the official 35.47%).

These percentages, collected in a territorial power analysis published by Demócrata and citing a compilation by Fernando H. Valls, show that in all communities governed by the PP it was the leading force in votes in the latest regional elections, often by wide margins against the PSOE and other parties. Source: analysis on the PP regional barons at Demócrata.

Overall, the latest regional elections in communities governed by the PP show a clearly favorable cycle for that party: very broad victories in Galicia, Madrid, or La Rioja; strong results but sometimes without absolute majority in Castile and León or Aragon, where Vox is key; and a particularly significant cycle change in traditionally socialist territories such as Andalusia and Extremadura.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What is the main reason cited by the PP and Canary Islands communities for rejecting the Strategic Plan for Inclusive Education?

Question 1 of 3

What does the Strategic Plan for Inclusive Education propose regarding special education centers?

Question 2 of 3

What agreement was reached at the Education Sectoral Conference held the same day?

Question 3 of 3

Hola, soy Fren. ¿Cómo te ayudo?