What has happened between Verstappen and Lawson: the penalty that changes their start in Mexico

The FIA has sanctioned Max Verstappen and Liam Lawson with one place on the starting grid of the Mexican Grand Prix after starring in an incident during the second free practice sessions. Both drivers, belonging to the Red Bull structure, also receive a penalty point on their super licenses. The stewards consider that their behavior was "unacceptable" and that they could have avoided the crash.

fotonoticia 20260915130244 1920

fotonoticia 20260915130244 1920

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

5 minutes

Most read

Elecciones 29N · Encuestas

La media de las encuestas

Media a 27 de octubre de 2026 · 15 institutos

  • PP31,0 %
  • PSOE27,3 %
  • Vox18,9 %
  • Frente Amplio6,3 %
  • Podemos2,9 %
  • ERC2,3 %
010203040ene 2024jul 2024ene 2025jul 2025ene 2026jul 2026

Media del último estudio de cada instituto en 30 días y su evolución semanal desde el 23J. Partidos con al menos un 2 %.

Todas las encuestas

Elecciones generales del 29 de noviembre · Demócrata

Max Verstappen and Liam Lawson have been involved in one of the first controversies of the 2026 Mexico City Formula 1 Grand Prix, after both drivers collided during the second free practice session held this Friday at the Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez. The incident, which occurred in the stadium section, caused damage to both single-seaters and forced the session to be temporarily halted with a red flag to clear the debris that had been scattered on the asphalt.

The International Automobile Federation (FIA) has decided to sanction both drivers with the loss of one position on the starting grid for Sunday, November 1, in addition to imposing a penalty point on their respective super licenses. The decision was made known this Saturday, October 31, after the stewards analyzed the footage, the cars' data, and the explanations offered by those involved. In its ruling, the sporting officials consider that both Verstappen and Lawson carried out unnecessary maneuvers during a practice session in which neither was directly contesting a racing position.

The episode has generated special attention because both belong to the Red Bull structure, although they compete for different teams. Verstappen drives for Red Bull Racing, while Lawson does so for Racing Bulls, the sister team. In addition, the two had already shared a team for a brief period, before the New Zealander was replaced in the main lineup.

What happened between Verstappen and Lawson during practice in Mexico

The incident took place in the first minutes of the second free practice session, when Verstappen tried to overtake Lawson on the approach to turn 12, one of the entrances to the Mexican circuit's stadium section. According to the stewards' investigation, the Dutch driver was completing a preparation lap, while Lawson was doing a cooling lap before starting another fast attempt.

The Dutch champion launched himself through the inside of turn 12, but the Racing Bulls driver held his position and both arrived practically side by side at the next corner. The dispute continued until turn 14, where Verstappen went over the kerb and ended up making contact with Lawson’s single-seater. The crash caused damage to the floor and aerodynamic elements of the Red Bull, in addition to damage to the front wing of the Racing Bulls.

The debris forced race direction to show a red flag to clear the track, although both drivers were later able to return to activity. Finally, Verstappen finished fifth in Free Practice 2, 0.311 seconds off Charles Leclerc’s best time, while Lawson finished ninth, 0.628 seconds behind the Ferrari driver. The incident did not prevent them from completing part of their work programs, but it did leave sporting consequences for Sunday’s race.

The FIA sanctions Verstappen and Lawson: they will lose one position on the grid

After reviewing what happened, the stewards decided to impose the same sanction on the two drivers: a one-place grid penalty and one point on the super license. The resolution considers that both acted incorrectly and recalls that the teams had received a warning during the team principals’ meeting held before practice sessions.

"The drivers of both cars behaved in a manner that was considered unacceptable by the stewards", the FIA decision states, adding that both acknowledged that their maneuvers had been "unnecessary" and "clumsy".

The sanction is especially striking because incidents of this type during free practice are usually resolved with a formal warning, but the stewards decided to toughen their response due to the existence of similar precedents during the season and the prior warning conveyed to the teams. The FIA considers that drivers must avoid potentially dangerous maneuvers even when they are not contesting race positions.

The penalty will be applied once the results of Saturday’s qualifying are known. Therefore, Verstappen and Lawson will lose one position relative to the place they obtain in the qualifying session, although the final starting order will also depend on any possible sanctions affecting other drivers.

The penalty also includes a penalty point for each on their superlicense. With this decision, Verstappen accumulates one point during the last twelve months, while Lawson reaches four. Penalty points have disciplinary consequences, since a driver who accumulates twelve in a period of twelve months receives an automatic suspension for a Grand Prix.

Verstappen lashes out at Lawson and questions his behavior

The tension between both drivers continued after the session. Verstappen publicly criticized Lawson's performance, considering that the New Zealander had taken unnecessary risks during a practice run that did not justify such a confrontation.

"I don't think it can be called bad luck. Maybe it was not very intelligent behavior on his part," said the Red Bull driver to the media. The Dutchman went further when referring to Lawson's professional situation, whose future at Racing Bulls for 2027 is still not confirmed: "When you're fighting for your seat, it's not very intelligent behavior".

Lawson, for his part, also showed his displeasure immediately after the incident. Through his team radio, the New Zealander reproached Verstappen for having ended up hitting his single-seater, in a reaction that reflected the disagreement between the two over responsibility for the contact.

The Racing Bulls director, Alan Permane, also questioned the behavior of the two drivers and considered that the incident was completely avoidable. The team boss explained that neither needed to take so much risk during a practice session and pointed out that both could have managed the situation better.

Despite the exchange of reproaches, the stewards' decision does not distinguish between the two participants and establishes an equivalent disciplinary responsibility for Verstappen and Lawson.

What time is qualifying and when is the Mexico GP held

The sanction comes before a qualifying session that will determine the definitive starting positions in the Formula 1 Mexico Grand Prix, corresponding to the nineteenth round of the 2026 World Championship.

The qualifying will be held this Saturday, October 31 at 22:00 hours, in Spanish mainland time, while the race will take place on Sunday, November 1 at 21:00 hours. The drivers will have to complete 71 laps of the Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez, a 4.304-kilometer circuit characterized by its altitude and by the demanding stadium section, precisely where the incident occurred.

For Verstappen, the penalty comes at an important moment in the season, although the Dutchman no longer has mathematical options of conquering the 2026 world title. His attention is now focused on the fight for the runner-up spot, where he maintains a reduced gap with respect to other contenders, among them George Russell, Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc.

Losing one position on the grid could complicate the Red Bull driver's start, especially on a track where the first corners usually offer overtaking opportunities and where the starting position influences race strategy. Lawson will also have to face the same penalty in a weekend in which he seeks to consolidate his performance and strengthen his chances of staying on in Formula 1.

The clash between the two has thus left consequences beyond simple practice sessions: two damaged cars, a red flag, an exchange of reproaches and an identical sanction for two drivers from the Red Bull family. Now it will be qualifying that determines from which positions they must tackle the Mexico Grand Prix.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What is the appeal process before the FIA in case of sporting sanctions during free practice sessions in Formula 1?

I cannot help you in detail on that matter because I specialize in Spanish politics and public institutions, not in the FIA sporting regulations or the internal appeal procedures in Formula 1. It is a specific technical-sporting field governed by its own rules (International Sporting Code, F1 sporting regulations, FIA bodies, etc.) that are not part of the institutional scope I cover.

My focus is everything related to:

  • Spanish laws and regulations: processing of laws in the General Courts and regional parliaments, royal decree-laws, regulations, ministerial orders and their impact.
  • Public institutions: Government of Spain, ministries, parliaments, regulatory bodies and regional administrations, and how they are organized and make decisions.
  • Parliamentary activity: initiatives, debates, votes, government oversight, parliamentary committees and hearings.
  • Public policies and sectoral regulation: energy, transport, health, education, digital, housing, rural environment, etc., always from the regulatory and political perspective in Spain.
  • Political and social actors: parties, parliamentary groups, political leaders and major public debates linked to the Spanish or European institutional framework.

If you want, I could help you understand, for example:

  • How a sanctioning procedure works in the Spanish administrative field.
  • What appeal routes exist against sanctions imposed by a public administration in Spain.
  • The role of Spanish sports federations and the Administrative Sports Tribunal (TAD) in our legal system.
  • How sports competitions are regulated from the perspective of Spanish public law.

If you reformulate your question towards any of these aspects (for example, generally comparing the model of sports appeals in Spain with that of international bodies, or asking about the appeals structure in Spanish sport), I can give you a detailed explanation tailored to what interests you.

What competencies and functions does the team principal have in a Formula 1 team according to FIA regulations?

I do not have the necessary specialization to provide you with a detailed and technically reliable answer about the competencies and functions of the team principal of a Formula 1 team according to FIA regulations. I am specifically designed to work with information from the Spanish political and institutional field (Congress, Senate, governments, regulations, parties, public actors, etc.), not with international sports regulations such as those of the International Automobile Federation.

This has an important consequence: although I generally know what a team principal in Formula 1 is in a colloquial sense (figures like Toto Wolff, Christian Horner, Frederic Vasseur, etc.), I cannot base an answer on an updated and systematic reading of the FIA sporting, technical or licensing regulations. Those regulations specify in great detail who is recognized as a “competitor,” “team principal,” “sporting director” or other figures, what regulatory responsibilities they have before the sporting stewards, what forms they sign, how official communications are channeled during a Grand Prix, who is responsible for the team's conduct, what sanctions fall on whom, and in which specific articles each obligation is set out.

To properly answer what you ask — that is, “according to FIA regulations” — one would have to:

  • Locate the current version of the FIA International Sporting Code and the annexes applicable to the Formula 1 World Championships.
  • Review the FIA Formula One Sporting Regulations, where the figures interacting with Race Direction and the stewards (team representative, team manager, etc.) are usually detailed.
  • Check whether the FIA expressly defines the figure of “team principal”/“team director” or instead regulates the entity “competitor” (the team) and designates one or more responsible representatives.
  • Extract the specific articles that assign duties and powers to that person or that team representative: attendance at mandatory briefings, receipt of official communications, right to submit inquiries or protests, obligation to ensure the team complies with technical and sporting regulations, responsibility for statements and conduct of team personnel, etc.

All that detailed reading of the FIA regulations and verification of the latest official version requires access to specialized sources that are outside the scope for which I am configured. Therefore, it would not be honest for me to now give you a list of “competencies and functions” as if it were a reliable transcription or summary of the regulations: I would run a very high risk of omitting obligations, mixing rules from different seasons or even attributing as “regulatory competence” what is actually only an internal organizational practice of each team.

What I can do is guide you, in a general and non-regulatory way, about the type of functions usually associated with a team principal in Formula 1 as commonly described in media and sports literature (for example, strategic leadership of the team, supervision of on-track performance, management of drivers and technical staff, coordination with engineering departments, ultimate responsibility for high-level sporting decisions and public representation of the team before the FIA, FOM, sponsors and media). But that would no longer be “according to FIA regulations,” but a role description based on customs and practices in the sport.

Since my field of work is politics and institutions in Spain, I can help you, for example, with:

  • Explaining competencies and functions of Spanish public officials (ministers, secretaries of state, directors general, presidents of regulatory bodies, etc.).
  • Detailing how norms and decisions are regulated and processed in the Spanish political system (laws, royal decree-laws, ministerial orders, parliamentary regulations).
  • Analyzing legislative proposals and public policies affecting specific sectors (energy, transport, sport as public policy, media, etc.).
  • Contextualizing political news and debates in Spain, including those related to sport when they enter the public or regulatory sphere (for example, sports laws, federation regulation, audiovisual rights, integrity and betting, etc.).

If you are interested in connecting motorsport with the political or regulatory field, I could contribute more there. For example:

  • Analyzing how motor sport is regulated in Spain (competencies of the Higher Sports Council, federations, state or regional regulations related).
  • Explaining how sports federations are organized from the legal-administrative point of view in Spain.
  • Seeing what role Spanish public administrations have in organizing Grand Prix or international events on national territory (fees, contracts, economic impact, public aid, etc.).

If you reformulate your question oriented to the political, institutional or regulatory framework (for example, “what competencies does the Royal Spanish Automobile Federation have according to Spanish law” or “how does Spain regulate sports federations”), I can help you with much more precision and detail, always within my area of expertise.

What requirements must drivers meet to keep their super license active and what are the consequences of accumulating penalty points?

I do not have the detailed and updated information you need about the technical and sporting requirements drivers must meet to keep their super license active nor about the specific regime of penalty points in motorsport competitions such as Formula 1. I specialize in the Spanish political and institutional field (laws, parliaments, government, regulations, public actors, etc.), not in international sports regulations nor in private federation rules, so I cannot give you a reliable explanation with a guarantee of validity about that specific sanctioning regime.

To properly answer what you ask, one would have to handle the current text of the Sporting Regulations and the International Sporting Code of the corresponding federation (for example, the FIA in the case of Formula 1). Those documents usually detail:

  • The criteria for obtaining, renewing and maintaining the super license (results in lower categories, hours of competition, medical and physical evaluations, safety training, etc.).
  • The penalty points system that accumulate for infractions on track or behaviors contrary to safety and sporting spirit, with a maximum tolerated within a certain period of time.
  • The disciplinary consequences of reaching or exceeding that maximum (usually suspensions for one or more races, financial penalties or other sporting measures).

Since I do not have direct, verified and stable access to that regulation nor its latest version, any attempt to reconstruct from memory how many points are needed to cause suspension, which infractions add how many points, or what objective requirements (age, previous licenses, number of test kilometers, etc.) are required to keep the super license, would carry a high risk of being outdated or inaccurate. Given that it is a very specific regime and can change frequently by decisions of the federation itself, it would not be responsible to give you concrete numbers or thresholds without being able to verify them.

What I can do is guide you, in general terms, on where and how to find that information reliably:

  • Check the official website of the corresponding federation (for example, the FIA in the case of international motorsport). They usually have a Regulations or Sporting Regulations section with:
    • The International Sporting Code.
    • The Specific Sporting Regulations of the championship (for example, Formula 1 World Championship Sporting Regulations), where the super license system is usually detailed.
  • Consult frequently asked questions (FAQ) documents or explanatory guides that the organization itself or specialized media publish when rules are updated, where it is explained in simpler language how many penalty points imply a suspension and within what timeframe they are counted.
  • Verify the update date of the regulation: even if you find a PDF with the correct title, it is important to check that it is the current version for the current season, since small changes can modify both the super license requirements and the points scale and their effects.

If you are doing academic work or a comparative analysis (for example, between different sanctioning systems in sport and in administrative or criminal law), I can help you with the more legal–institutional part in Spain. For example:

  • Explain how the administrative sanction system and loss of validity of the driving license by points works in Spain.
  • Analyze how disciplinary regimes are generally regulated in Spanish laws (sports law, statutes of sports federations, etc.), as long as we stay within the national public or para-public normative field.
  • Help you compare, from a conceptual perspective, a system of professional licenses or certifications (such as a professional title regulated by law) with a system of private sports licenses, highlighting structural similarities and differences.

In summary, I cannot precisely answer your question about the requirements to maintain the super license nor about the exact consequences of accumulating penalty points within the regulatory framework of the motorsport competition you have in mind, because it is outside my area of expertise and would require direct and updated access to the internal regulation of the corresponding federation. However, I can help you with issues related to Spanish public law, the regulation of sport from the legal perspective in Spain, or with comparative analyses based on official Spanish norms and the principles of public sanctioning regimes.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

At which corner of the Autódromo Hermanos Rodríguez did the contact between Verstappen and Lawson occur?

Question 1 of 3

What penalty did Verstappen and Lawson receive after the incident in the free practice sessions?

Question 2 of 3

On what day and time will the qualifying session for the 2026 Mexican Grand Prix be held in Spanish peninsular time?

Question 3 of 3