Vox asks the Supreme Court to force the Government to prove that it applies the suspension of the grandchildren's law.

Vox demands the Supreme Court to force the Government to prove that it complies with the precautionary suspension of the vote for naturalized citizens by the grandchild law.

fotonoticia 20261016152118 1920

fotonoticia 20261016152118 1920

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

2 minutes

Most read

España vota · Congreso y Senado

Elecciones generales 29 de noviembre de 2026

Se eligen 350 diputados y los senadores de elección directa. Encuestas, calendario, candidaturas, programas y todo lo que necesitas saber para votar.

Faltan 43 días y 18 horas para que abran los colegios electorales.Hasta que abran los colegios, el domingo 29 a las 09:00 (hora peninsular).
Entra en el especial

Próximas fechas

  1. HoyÚltimo día para comunicar coaliciones electoralesFecha prevista
  2. Presentación de candidaturas al Congreso y al Senado21–26 oct · Fecha prevista
  3. Voto desde el extranjero (CERA): envío de la documentación24–30 oct · Fecha prevista
  4. Publicación de las candidaturas presentadasFecha prevista
Calendario completo

Vox has urged the Supreme Court to order the Government to demonstrate that it is applying the measures set with the precautionary suspension of the vote of those nationalized under the 'grandchildren's law', including the identification of those who prove to be descendants of exiles and, therefore, have the right to participate in the general elections.

In a document accessed by Europa Press, the party demands that the Executive, the National Institute of Statistics (INE), and the Central Electoral Board (JEC) be required to "immediately, fully, and effectively comply" with what was agreed upon by the High Court.

The party led by Santiago Abascal maintains that these institutions must guarantee the "strict, exact, and timely compliance with the precautionary measures adopted in order to execute them to avoid that the negligence and rebellious will to comply that they have demonstrated so far, prevents the precautionary protection agreed upon."

Additionally, it requests that the "bodies and officials responsible, means, procedures, and deadlines for compliance be specified, with an operational plan necessarily aligned with the electoral calendar, that determines the practical possibility of compliance" with the measures, with the aim that the passage of time does not "deprive the precautionary measure of effectiveness."

Vox recalls that the magistrates, to safeguard the voting rights of those who obtained nationality claiming the exile of their ancestors, required that those wishing to vote provide a certification issued "under responsibility" by the consular registers.

It also emphasizes that the Supreme Court "noted" that, after a month since the precautionary suspension, "it was unknown whether the breakdown had begun and how many files had been classified, qualifying the level of compliance as nonexistent or, at least, unknown."

At the same time, Iustitia Europa, which along with Vox promoted the appeals that led to the precautionary suspension, has requested the magistrates to declare the lack of standing to intervene as parties in the proceedings of the associations Cubanos por la Democracia and Ascendientes Españoles en el Mundo.

This organization requests that its petitions to appear be rejected, arguing that "the standing of associations seeking to appear does not acquire legitimacy by the mere existence of potentially affected individuals belonging to the social group to which it directs its purposes," in reference to the open deadline for those affected by the precautionary measure to submit allegations.

"The procedural representation of those interests requires a specific title and direct connection with the object of the process. Both associations lack that title," states Iustitia Europa in a document addressed to the High Court that this news agency has accessed.