The 23 minutes that ended in the Urda tragedy: a breakdown, two trains and unanswered questions

The failure of a safety system, an authorization to resume the journey, and the warnings from a train that was still stopped preceded the crash that has left 69 dead

EuropaPress 7876659 gruas trabajando labores desescombro accidente ferroviario urda 29 octubre

EuropaPress 7876659 gruas trabajando labores desescombro accidente ferroviario urda 29 octubre

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

9 minutes

Most read

Elecciones 29N · Encuestas

La media de las encuestas

Media a 27 de octubre de 2026 · 15 institutos

  • PP31,0 %
  • PSOE27,3 %
  • Vox18,9 %
  • Sumar6,3 %
  • Podemos2,9 %
  • ERC2,3 %
010203040ene 2024jul 2024ene 2025jul 2025ene 2026jul 2026

Media del último estudio de cada instituto en 30 días y su evolución semanal desde el 23J. Partidos con al menos un 2 %.

Todas las encuestas

Elecciones generales del 29 de noviembre · Demócrata

At 8:30 in the morning on Wednesday, October 28, six trains running on the Madrid-Seville high-speed line were affected by a computer fault in the LZB protection system. None of its passengers could know then that that incident, apparently limited to the functioning of the railway infrastructure, would be the beginning of a sequence that, just 23 minutes later, would end with a Renfe AVE crashed into the rear of a stopped Iryo in Urda (Toledo).

The collision, recorded around 8:53 a.m., has left to date 69 dead and numerous injured people. Emergency teams have worked for two days among the remains of the convoys, while hospitals attend to the survivors and families wait for news about their loved ones.

The tragedy has opened a judicial and technical investigation that has still not determined all its causes. The first explanations from the Ministry of Transport point to an incorrect authorization to resume traffic, but the recordings known later raise other questions about the information available at the Adif control center, the communications with both trains and the procedures that should have been applied when the safety system failed.

The 23 decisive minutes

Wednesday, October 28, 2026 · Urda (Toledo)

Reconstruction
The LZB fails

A computer incident affects the railway protection system and stops six trains.

The AVE receives authorization

Adif control center in Atocha tells the AVE to resume normal movement.

The Iryo remains stopped

The driver reports that it remains stopped before the entrance to Urda.

New warning from the Iryo

She reports that she cannot restart the LZB and remains stopped.

The collision occurs

The AVE hits the Iryo from behind, in the vicinity of kilometer 118.

Approximate times reconstructed from official explanations

8:30 a.m. Six trains stopped by a breakdown

The first incident occurred around 8:30, when a computer failure interrupted the operation of the LZB system on a stretch of approximately 63 kilometers of the Madrid-Seville line.

This system supervises railway traffic and transmits information to trains to control their speed and ensure that safety conditions are respected. When communication was lost, the six affected convoys were stopped.

Among them were the Renfe AVE 2080, which had left Madrid-Atocha at 8:00 bound for Seville, and the Iryo 6076, which had departed a few minutes earlier toward the same city.

Management of the incident went to Adif's control center in Atocha, from where instructions to restore traffic were coordinated. From that moment on, communications between the drivers and the railway traffic managers became a key piece of what would happen later.

8:36 a.m. The order to resume movement

Six minutes after the breakdown, the AVE driver received authorization to continue his journey. According to recordings broadcast by various media, from the control center they indicated to him to disconnect and reconnect the LZB and to resume circulation through the lateral signaling blocking system, with "normal movement".

The expression is decisive for the investigation. The visual running procedure, foreseen for certain situations of loss of protection, requires taking extreme precautions and traveling at a reduced speed that allows the train to stop before any obstacle.

The Minister of Transport, Óscar Puente, described on Wednesday the authorization as "erroneous" and "inexplicable" and assured that circulation should have been carried out at a speed of about 40 kilometers per hour, instead of allowing the AVE to continue at considerably higher speeds.

However, determining responsibilities does not depend solely on identifying who transmitted the order. Investigators must establish which procedure corresponded to be applied, what information each person involved had, and why the existing safety barriers did not prevent two trains from ending up occupying the same stretch of track.

8:41 a.m. A train remains stopped in Urda

While the AVE continued its journey, the Iryo remained stopped at the entrance to Urda. Its driver communicated to the control center that she had suffered a loss of transmission and that she could not resume circulation normally.

The recordings show that Adif officials were informed of the Iryo's situation when the AVE had already received authorization to continue.

The distance between both trains began to narrow. The AVE traveled approximately 25 kilometers during the 17 minutes that elapsed between the authorization and the impact.

8:48 a.m. The warning that did not prevent the crash

Five minutes before the accident, the Iryo driver contacted the control center again. Her train was still stopped and she could not restart the LZB system.

"I am still stopped at the entrance signal," she communicated, according to the audio published by the press. The conversation constitutes one of the central moments of the reconstruction. The control center received new confirmation that the Iryo was still immobilized, but the communications known so far do not show that an order was transmitted to the AVE to stop before reaching its position.

8:53 a.m. The impact

Around 8:53, the AVE hit the Iryo from behind at kilometer point 118, in the vicinity of Urda.

The violence of the collision destroyed part of the convoys and caused two cars of the Iryo to fall down an embankment. The front part of the AVE was severely damaged and several coaches suffered enormous damage.

Hundreds of people were traveling on the two trains. Many were headed to Seville, where neither of the convoys arrived that morning.

At 9:10, Adif publicly announced the interruption of traffic on the Madrid-Andalusia high-speed line as a consequence of a rear-end collision between two trains. The real scale of the accident would become known progressively during the following hours.

The first day. Rescue, hospitals and families seeking answers

The arrival of emergency services gave way to a rescue operation that lasted throughout Wednesday and the early hours of Thursday.

Firefighters, medical personnel, Civil Guard, Judicial Police and members of the Military Emergency Unit worked among the remains of the trains. The presence of deformed and displaced carriages made it necessary to use heavy machinery to access the most damaged areas that were still at the scene of the events on Thursday night.

At the same time, hospitals in Castilla-La Mancha and Madrid began to receive the injured. The magnitude of the accident mobilized extraordinary health resources and opened a complex process of victim identification.

At the Institute of Legal Medicine of Toledo, forensic teams began identification tasks, while the Civil Guard collected missing-person reports and DNA samples from relatives.

The uncertainty about the whereabouts of some passengers lasted for hours, amid calls to hospitals, consultations with emergency services and trips by relatives to Toledo.

Thursday 29. The toll rises to 69 dead

On Thursday morning, the president of Castilla-La Mancha, Emiliano García-Page, confirmed that the number of dead had risen from 68 to 69 people, after a new death was recorded in the hospital.

Of the 110 injured treated in hospitals in the autonomous community, 60 had been discharged and 50 remained hospitalized. Among them were 15 patients classified as red code, although four of those in the most serious condition were evolving favorably, according to the regional president.

Rescue and inspection work continued during the day, especially in the areas where it was still necessary to move the wrecked carriages.

In the afternoon there was confusion over the number of fatal victims. The Railway Accident Investigation Commission initially published a file on the accident with 74 dead, but shortly afterward corrected that figure and reduced it to 69, in line with the official toll provided by Castilla-La Mancha.

Urda shakes the pre-campaign

The accident triggered a political crisis that reaches the Government in the middle of the campaign for the general elections of November 29, barely nine months after the Adamuz (Córdoba) tragedy, in which 46 people died. Two accidents add up to 115 fatalities.

The President of the Government, Pedro Sánchez, described the succession of both tragedies as "unacceptable," although Moncloa has reaffirmed its confidence in Óscar Puente, who rules out resigning and will remain at the head of the Ministry of Transport. The decision comes amid criticism from the opposition, railway unions and even some voices within the PSOE, especially after the minister pointed to an erroneous human decision in the management of traffic.

For its part, the PP has requested the urgent appearance of Sánchez before the Permanent Deputation of Congress, while partners demand explanations about safety protocols and the circumstances of the accident. Puente will appear before the Chamber on Tuesday, November 3, with an investigation still open and numerous pending questions about the decisions adopted from the Adif control center.

The shock over the accident also led this Thursday to King Felipe VI and Letizia to the Toledo University Hospital, where they visited the injured, spoke with the health professionals and conveyed their support to the families of the victims.

Subsequently, they met with relatives in the Casa Sacerdotal of Toledo. During his address to the media, Felipe VI called for the investigation to clarify "how and why this catastrophe has happened" and to allow measures to be adopted "so that this does not happen again." "As a society, we are once again suffering a very hard blow, but we must continue moving forward even with that pain, never forgetting the wound left by so many people who have lost their lives", said the monarch, who asked that the consequences of the tragedy be faced "with dignity and rigor."

The questions that remain open

Two days after the accident, the main sequence of what happened is beginning to be documented, but essential questions still remain.

Why did the LZB system fail? What procedure should have been applied to restore traffic? Why was the AVE authorized to continue with normal movement? The answers will determine whether the tragedy was the consequence of an individual action, a succession of failures or a combination of factors that have still not been clarified.

In Urda, meanwhile, the identification tasks, care for the survivors and support for the families continue. The reconstruction of those 23 minutes is essential to explain how the accident happened, but also to answer the question that remains behind each new piece of information about the accident: what would have had to function differently for the two trains to have reached their destination.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What parliamentary procedures are necessary to modify railway safety protocols after accidents like the one in Urda?

Not every modification of railway safety protocols needs to go through Parliament. The decisive issue is whether the intention is to change a law or to adopt technical measures within the existing legal framework. An accident like the one you mention may motivate parliamentary reforms and controls, but it does not by itself impose a mandatory legislative sequence.

1. Distinguish the protocol from the rule that supports it

If the modification only affects operational instructions or regulatory provisions, it does not necessarily require passing a law: it must follow the corresponding procedure before the competent body. However, a regulatory provision cannot modify what is established by a law without express authorization. Therefore, before choosing the parliamentary procedure, it is necessary to identify which specific obligation is intended to be changed and where it is regulated.

2. When it is necessary to modify a law

There are two main routes, regulated in articles 109 to 127 of the Congress Regulations:

  • Government bill. It is submitted to Congress with a statement of reasons and background. The Board orders its publication, sends it to the competent committee, and opens the amendment period, usually fifteen working days. It does not require a prior vote for consideration.
  • Parliamentary bill. It can be presented by a group or a deputy with fourteen other signatures. It is published and sent to the Government to express its opinion and, when appropriate, its budgetary conformity. Afterwards, the Plenary decides on its consideration: that is, whether to start processing it.

From there, the process includes amendments, a report from a committee — a small group of parliamentarians — and committee debate and report. Total amendments to a bill, if any, are debated first in the Plenary. Approval may correspond to the Plenary or to the committee with full legislative competence, when constitutionally delegable.

3. Senate and final approval

The approved text is sent to the Senate, which can accept it, amend it, or veto it. It has two months, reduced to twenty days in urgent procedures. If it introduces changes or a veto, the text returns to Congress.

Congress decides on the amendments by simple majority. It can override the veto by absolute majority or, after two months from its imposition, by simple majority. Urgency also allows reducing Congress's ordinary deadlines by half; it does not eliminate debate or votes.

4. Urgent measures by royal decree-law

Another route is the royal decree-law, subject to its constitutional requirements. Congress must decide on its validation or repeal within thirty days. This vote decides whether the provision is maintained; it does not allow introducing amendments directly.

After validation, its processing as an urgent bill may be agreed upon, then opening the possibility of modifying it. The Senate intervenes in that subsequent legislative processing, not in the validation. If Congress is dissolved, this last decision corresponds to the Permanent Deputation.

5. Investigating and demanding explanations is not equivalent to reforming
  • Appearances and questions: allow requesting documentation, hearing the Government and experts, and overseeing the measures adopted.
  • Non-legislative motions and motions: are registered, admitted, debated, and voted on; they serve to urge the Government to act, but do not themselves modify the protocols.
  • Investigation committee: its creation requires Plenary agreement; it develops a work plan and submits conclusions for debate and approval. These do not replace a regulatory reform nor bind the courts.

In short, investigating the accident and changing the rules are different procedures: the former can promote reform, but are not general prerequisites to adopt it.

What are the competencies of the Minister of Transport according to Spanish legislation?

The Minister of Transport and Sustainable Mobility directs the Government's policy on state-competent transport infrastructures and services, as well as on sustainable mobility. Their scope also includes lesser-known matters, such as postal regulatory organization and state services of cartography, astronomy, geodesy, and geophysics. It is important to distinguish between the direction that corresponds to the minister and the execution functions attributed to the Ministry's bodies.

Legal basis and scope

Article 7 of Royal Decree 829/2023 assigns the department the proposal and execution of policies on state terrestrial, air, and maritime infrastructures and transport, to guarantee fair and sustainable mobility.

Article 1 of Royal Decree 253/2024 develops that mandate: it includes infrastructures, control and administrative regulation of services, sustainable mobility, and investment planning. These attributions must be exercised coordinately and without prejudice to those corresponding to other ministries.

Main material competencies

  • Roads and road transport. Direct the state policy of road infrastructures and the regulation of road transport. Includes investments, conservation, maintenance, concessions, and technical and economic-financial supervision of concessionary companies, through competent bodies. Articles 3, 4, and 6 of Royal Decree 253/2024 distribute these functions.
  • Railway. Direct the planning and evaluation of the General Interest Railway Network and the regulation of state railway services. Includes promoting investments and coordinating infrastructures and services, prioritizing safety, maintenance, and daily mobility. Its development is found in articles 2, 3, 5, and 6.
  • Air and maritime transport. Lead state policies of both sectors and their infrastructures, including port planning and investments in ports of general interest. The distribution of functions is developed in articles 2 and 7 to 9.
  • Sustainable mobility. Promote strategies for safe, socially just, and environmentally sustainable mobility, including active mobility. Also promote the combination of different means of transport, logistics, and cooperation with other administrations in urban mobility plans. Regulated by articles 2, 10, and 11.
  • Investments, aid, and European financing. Guide the programming of investments in infrastructures and mobility, as well as the department's aid and economic instruments. Includes European funds and Recovery Plan actions, according to articles 2, 10, and 11.
  • Postal and geographic services. Direct the policy of postal regulatory organization and state services of astronomy, geodesy, geophysics, and cartography, according to article 1.1.

Department direction and limits

The minister directly oversees the State Secretariat for Transport and Sustainable Mobility and the Undersecretariat, according to article 1.2. The former develops sectoral policies under their direction. Therefore, not every authorization, contract, or technical decision should be personally attributed to the minister: the regulation distributes these actions among specific bodies.

The strategic direction, evaluation, and control of results of Ports of the State, ADIF, Adif-High Speed, Renfe-Operator, and Enaire are attributed to the State Secretariat by article 2.9. Likewise, article 1.4 places under the minister's direct dependence the coordination of the department's international relations.

Finally, Royal Decree 690/2025 strengthened crisis coordination and victim assistance through an observatory dependent on the State Secretariat, without assuming direct management of emergencies. In short, the minister directs the whole, but must respect territorial competencies, those of other departments, and the specific attributions of each body.

What legal requirements must railway protection systems like LZB meet for their approval in Spain?

In Spain, a railway protection system like LZB must demonstrate safety, technical compatibility, and safe integration before its use. Legally, a generic equipment approval is not enough: the evaluation of the product, verification of the subsystem, and authorization corresponding to its installation must be distinguished. The following refers to the General Interest Railway Network.

1. Applicable legal framework

The central references are Law 38/2015 of the railway sector, of September 29, and Royal Decree 929/2020, of October 27, on railway operational safety and interoperability. The latter incorporates Directives (EU) 2016/797, on interoperability, and 2016/798, on railway safety.

The royal decree differentiates control-command and signaling on land, which constitutes a fixed subsystem, from that installed on board, which constitutes a mobile subsystem. Therefore, the procedure provided for track installations should not be automatically transferred to onboard equipment.

2. Technical and safety requirements
  • Essential requirements. Annex XI requires that installations allow circulation with the safety level set for the network and maintain fully safe conditions for trains authorized to run under degraded conditions.
  • Compatibility. Interfaces between track equipment, onboard equipment, and other affected elements must be demonstrated. Cab equipment must allow normal operation under specified conditions.
  • Applicable technical standards. The Technical Specifications for Interoperability —TSI— and relevant national standards must be met, respecting the scope and application strategy of each TSI. National standards cover, among other cases, aspects not fully regulated and compatibility with existing systems.

For an LZB project, it is crucial to identify the applicable requirements for its configuration and interfaces; it is not enough to state generally that it complies with European railway regulations.

3. Evaluation and documentation

Article 87 regulates the EC verification declaration of the subsystem, issued under the applicant's responsibility. Evaluation against the TSIs corresponds to notified bodies; verification of national standards, to designated bodies. This declaration should not be confused with conformity declarations of interoperability components.

The technical file must include:

  • Design, plans, electrical and control diagrams, and software and automation description with sufficient detail.
  • Certificates, component declarations, and relevant test, inspection, and audit reports.
  • Conditions and limits of use, monitoring and maintenance instructions, and operational restrictions.
  • Justification of compatibility and safe integration, with risk assessment and required independent reports.

Risk management is supported, when applicable, by the common method of Implementing Regulation (EU) 402/2013. The file must be kept throughout the subsystem's useful life.

4. Authorization and modifications

For new fixed installations, the State Railway Safety Agency —AESF— authorizes entry into service. The procedure includes prior communication, submission of projects before approval, evaluation after construction, and final request. Compliance with the test plan established or agreed with the infrastructure manager must be demonstrated.

The application includes verification declarations, technical compatibility, and a safety evaluation report from the safety assessment body on safe integration. AESF may impose conditions and restrictions. In improvements or renewals, it decides if new authorization is needed considering, among other criteria, the impact on safety and modified parameters.

The prior positive decision of the European Union Railway Agency foreseen for certain track projects with ETCS or GSM-R is not a general requirement automatically attributable to LZB.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

Which railway protection system suffered a failure that triggered the accident in Urda?

Question 1 of 3

At what speed, according to the Minister of Transport, should the AVE have been traveling after the protection system failure?

Question 2 of 3

How many trains were initially stopped due to the computer failure on the Madrid-Seville line on October 28, 2026?

Question 3 of 3