How much money do I lose by paying only the minimum payment of the credit card

A debt of 2,500 euros can end up costing 5,444.84 euros if a monthly payment of 50 euros is made. The Bank of Spain warns that reduced payments multiply the interest and can prevent the debt from decreasing.

6 minutes

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

6 minutes

Most read

A debt of 2,500 euros on a credit card with an annual equivalent rate of 22% can turn into a total payment of 5,444.84 euros if the holder limits themselves to paying 50 euros monthly. The credit would take 109 months to disappear: more than nine years to repay an amount whose final cost would exceed double the amount borrowed.

The difference is 2,944.84 euros in interest, calculated without new purchases, fees, insurance, or additional expenses. If during that period the card continues to be used, the result can worsen.

The so-called "revolving" cards allow for payment to be split into small, fixed installments or calculated as a percentage of the debt. The problem arises when the monthly payment barely covers the interest and only reduces a minimal part of the outstanding money.

The Bank of Spain warns that this system can prolong repayment for years and turn an apparently manageable credit into a particularly costly debt.

What happens when only the minimum payment of the card is made

Each monthly payment is distributed between the generated interest and the repayment of the outstanding capital. The lower the payment, the less money is allocated to reducing the debt.

On a card with 2,500 euros outstanding and an APR of 22%, the first month generates approximately 41.77 euros in interest. If the payment is 50 euros, only 8.23 euros reduce the borrowed capital.

The following month, interest is recalculated on the debt that remains outstanding. Although the balance decreases slowly, the process drags on and the accumulated cost increases.

The Bank of Spain explains that these cards can operate with a fixed payment or a percentage of the debt. Therefore, there is no universal minimum payment: it depends on the conditions agreed upon with each entity.

How much does a debt of 1,000, 2,500, or 5,000 euros cost

The following simulations show what happens when reduced monthly payments are maintained with different interest rates. The calculations use a APR of 12%, 18%, and 22%, without fees, new withdrawals, insurance, or defaults.

Initial debt APR Monthly payment Necessary time Total interest Total paid
1,000€ 12% 25€ 51 months 263.54€ 1,263.54€
1,000€ 18% 25€ 59 months 469.76€ 1,469.76€
1,000€ 22% 25€ 67 months 665.07€ 1,665.07€
2,500€ 12% 50€ 69 months 905.84€ 3,405.84€
2,500€ 18% 50€ 86 months 1,797.70€ 4,297.70€
2,500€ 22% 50€ 109 months 2,944.84€ 5,444.84€
5,000€ 12% 100€ 69 months 1,811.66€ 6,811.66€
5,000€ 18% 100€ 86 months 3,595.47€ 8,595.47€
5,000€ 22% 100€ 109 months 5,889.89€ 10,889.89€

The most expensive case is that of an initial debt of 5,000 euros with an APR of 22% and a payment of 100 euros. The client would end up paying 10,889.89 euros, of which 5,889.89 correspond solely to interest.

In that assumption, the interest even exceeds the amount initially financed. And the calculation starts from a favorable condition: that the card is no longer used at all from the first month.

The figures are mathematical simulations and do not represent concrete offers from any entity nor prejudge the validity of a specific contract.

How much money is saved by increasing the monthly payment

Increasing the monthly payment reduces the outstanding capital more quickly and decreases future interest. The difference can be considerable even with moderate increases.

For a debt of 2,500 euros at 22% APR, these are the results if the initial payment of 50 euros increases by 20%, 50%, or 100%:

Monthly payment Time to pay Total interest Saving compared to paying 50€
50€ 109 months 2,944.84€
60€ 72 months 1,813.94€ 1,130.90€
75€ 50 months 1,184.74€ 1,760.10€
100€ 33 months 763.83€ 2,181.01€

Paying only 10 euros more each month would allow saving 1,130.90 euros in interest and reduce the term by more than three years.

Doubling the payment to 100 euros would cut the duration from 109 to 33 monthly payments. The saving would reach 2,181.01 euros.

Banking regulations precisely require facilitating simulations of this type when certain conditions are met. The Order EHA/2899/2011 establishes that entities must inform about the result of increasing the payment by 20%, 50%, and 100%, in addition to indicating which monthly payment would allow settling the debt in one year.

When the minimum payment does not even cover the interest

In certain circumstances, the monthly payment is insufficient to pay the generated interest. Then, the debt does not decrease: it increases.

For example, a debt of 5,000 euros at 22% APR generates approximately 83.54 euros of interest during the first month.

If the client paid a fee of 75 euros, there would be 8.54 euros missing to even cover those interests. Without modifications to the conditions, the outstanding balance would increase and the debt could not be settled with that monthly payment.

The official simulator of the Bank of Spain expressly warns that a fee lower than the generated interests may prevent the amortization of the credit.

The situation may worsen when commissions, linked insurance, new purchases, cash withdrawals, or late payment interests are incorporated.

The additional risk of paying a percentage of the debt

Some cards do not establish a fixed amount, but rather a percentage of the outstanding balance. In that case, the fee usually decreases as the debt reduces, which can further prolong the repayment.

For example, with an initial debt of 2,500 euros at 18% APR, a fee equivalent to 3% of the balance and a minimum of 20 euros, the first payment would be 75 euros.

However, the monthly payment would decrease as the balance decreased. Under those conditions, the debt would take 127 months to disappear and would generate 1,815.11 euros in interests.

If the client maintained a fixed fee of 75 euros, without reducing it later, it would end in 46 months and pay 880.36 euros in interests.

The difference amounts to 934.75 euros additional for allowing the fee to decrease progressively.

This calculation is based on a specific assumption: each monthly payment is equivalent to 3% of the existing balance at the beginning of the period, with a floor of 20 euros. The actual conditions depend on each contract.

What information can be requested from the bank

The entity must periodically provide information about the credit used, the interest rate, and the situation of the debt.

The Bank of Spain reminds that the client can request:

  • The total amount used and the outstanding debt.
  • The applied interests and the commissions charged.
  • The details of the payments made.
  • The amortization table corresponding to the existing balance.
  • The expected cancellation date if the current fee is maintained.
  • The savings simulations if the monthly payment increases.
  • The fee necessary to settle the debt in one year.

When the holder requests this information, the entity has a maximum period of five business days to provide it, according to the regulation set forth in the BOE.

Furthermore, Article 30 of the Law 16/2011 on consumer credit contracts recognizes the right to repay the credit early, either totally or partially, with the corresponding reduction of future interests and costs.

The possible compensation for early repayment depends on the contract and the requirements established in the law itself.

What happens with the 22% limit announced by the Government

The Government approved in January 2026 a draft bill to reform the regulation of consumer credit, including "revolving" cards.

According to the Ministry of Economy, the text includes a temporary limit of 22% APR until the definitive system of caps by tranches is approved.

However, the approval of a draft bill does not equate to the entry into force of a law. The ministry itself presents the measure as part of a regulatory proposal and links its application to the approval and validity of the corresponding regulation.

Therefore, it cannot be stated that any card that automatically exceeds 22% is illegal solely due to the government announcement. To determine what limit is enforceable, it is necessary to check the contract, its date of formalization, and the effectively published and in-force regulations.

The Supreme Court has also established criteria to examine "revolving" cards from the perspective of usury and lack of transparency, but the nullity of a contract is not determined exclusively by an isolated figure nor is it for the Bank of Spain to declare it.

How to get out of a debt that keeps growing

The first step is to check the outstanding balance, the APR, and what part of each installment is actually allocated to amortizing capital.

Then, it is advisable to consider these measures:

  • Stop using the card while there is outstanding debt.
  • Increase the monthly payment, as long as the family budget allows.
  • Request the bank for simulations with different monthly payments.
  • Compare the cost of the card with other financing alternatives and their fees.
  • Make early repayments when possible.
  • Review if there are insurances, fees, or linked services that increase the operation's cost.
  • Request specialized advice if the contract could contain abusive conditions.

If the entity does not provide the information or there are discrepancies regarding the charged interests, a complaint must first be filed with its customer service.

The Bank of Spain explains the complaint procedure: for issues related to consumer credit, the consumer can go to the supervisor if the entity does not respond within one month or if the response is not satisfactory.

However, the agency itself warns that it does not have the authority to declare abusive or annul contractual clauses. Such disputes may require legal advice and, if applicable, a judicial claim.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

At what stage of parliamentary processing is the draft bill to limit the APR of revolving credit cards to 22% in Spain?

As of August 2026, the Government's plan to set a cap on consumer credit costs — including revolving credit cards — is structured through a draft bill on consumer credit, but that text has not yet been submitted to Congress as a bill. Therefore, the initiative is not in any formal parliamentary processing stage (neither admission for processing, nor amendment period, nor committee, nor report, etc.).

1. Origin of the “22% APR limit”

The reference to a limit around 22% for products like revolving credit cards comes from the draft of the new Consumer Credit Law approved in first reading by the Council of Ministers at the beginning of 2026. According to coverage by Demócrata and other specialized sources:

  • The draft establishes a general regime of APR caps for consumer credits, calculated based on the market average rate plus an additional margin.
  • Additionally, it sets a temporary maximum limit of 22% that would apply to new operations after the law comes into effect and also to the settlement of existing revolving credit card operations, as detailed in the legal analysis by Navas & Cusí cited by Demócrata.
  • Associations like Asufin view positively that a cap is set “for the first time,” but consider that this 22 percentage point margin is insufficient and call for limits more aligned with the usual cost of each type of credit.

In other words, the 22% limit is not an already approved law nor an article of a current regulation, but a proposal included in a draft bill still within the Government's scope.

2. Actual stage of the draft bill: still within the Government

Parliamentary and press information indicates that the procedure is in the typical pre-parliamentary stage of draft bills:

  • The Council of Ministers approves the draft bill and makes it public as the basis for a comprehensive reform of consumer credit, with caps on costs and interest (including revolving credit cards).
  • The text is subjected to public consultation so that financial entities, consumer associations, law firms, employers' organizations, and individuals can submit comments. Demócrata reports that this process opened in January 2026, with a deadline until January 30.
  • Simultaneously, reports from advisory bodies are gathered and technical and political adjustments are negotiated on sensitive points, such as the design of the caps and the specific treatment of high-cost credits.

All this happens before there is a “bill” in the strict sense. Until the Council of Ministers approves the text in second reading and submits it to the Cortes, there is no parliamentary processing.

3. Parliamentary situation: no bill registered yet

In the records of initiatives of the Congress and in the parliamentary agendas consulted, no specific bill on consumer credit or revolving credit cards clearly including that 22% cap as a central element appears:

  • There is no title such as “Consumer Credit Bill” or equivalent with an entry date in 2026 that can be associated with this draft.
  • What is observed is the Government's repeated announcement that the regulation will be sent to Congress “well into the year,” and several non-legislative motions on payday loans, mini-credits, and revolving credit cards, which are political initiatives without direct normative value.
  • There are also other economic bills in processing or blocked (such as the law on credit administrators and buyers or the Financial Customer Defense Authority), but these are different texts.

Consequently, as of today, there is no bill on this 22% limit being processed by Congress and Senate; the debate is still within the Executive and in the political and media sphere.

4. Summary of the current stage

Using the strict terminology of the legislative procedure:

  • The 22% APR limit for revolving credit cards is in a draft bill on consumer credit approved in first reading by the Government.
  • That draft is in the public consultation and internal review phase, within the governmental scope.
  • Parliamentary processing has not yet started: there is no bill registered in Congress, no qualification by the Board, no amendment period, nor plenary debates.

Therefore, to the literal question —“at what stage of parliamentary processing is it?”— the technical answer is that it is not yet in any parliamentary stage; it is in the prior draft stage within the Government, pending submission to the Cortes to begin its legislative journey.

What are the competencies of the Ministry of Economy regarding the regulation of consumer credit?

In Spain, the Ministry of Economy (under its recent various names, such as the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation) does not directly grant or supervise consumer credits, but it does set the basic regulatory framework and financial consumer protection. It does so mainly through laws and regulatory rules on consumer credit contracts, banking transparency, and lending responsibility, in coordination with the Bank of Spain and other authorities.

1. General framework of competencies

The Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation is configured, according to ministerial restructuring royal decrees and organic structure (Royal Decree 2/2020, Royal Decree 139/2020 and its amendments, such as Royal Decree 798/2022 and Royal Decree 156/2022), as the department responsible for proposing and executing the Government's economic and financial policy. Within this scope are included:

  • The regulation of the financial system and credit institutions.
  • The regulation of banking services and products, including consumer credits.
  • The protection of financial services clients and banking transparency.

Law 10/2014, on the regulation, supervision, and solvency of credit institutions (text in BOE) places prudential supervision of entities with the Bank of Spain, but within a normative framework defined by the legislator and Government regarding solvency, corporate governance, and discipline. In parallel, other transparency and consumer credit rules articulate the Ministry's normative role.

2. Regulation of consumer credit

The Law 16/2011, on consumer credit contracts (text in BOE) transposes Directive 2008/48/EC and sets the legal regime for consumer credits (loans, deferred payments, credit lines to consumers).

From this law derive several key competencies of the Ministry of Economy:

  • Regulatory development: the law empowers the Ministry of Economy and Finance to approve technical rules, particularly on the formula and cases for calculating the Annual Percentage Rate (APR), so it can adapt to future changes in EU regulations.
  • Definition of the protection level: Law 16/2011 coordinates with Law 2/2011 on Sustainable Economy, which imposes obligations for client solvency assessment and promotion of responsible lending. The Ministry designs this regulatory framework.
  • Sanctioning regime: non-compliance by credit institutions is sanctioned according to the discipline and intervention regulations of credit institutions (Law 10/2014 and related rules), whose general design depends on the Government and its economic Ministry.

3. Transparency and protection of banking clients

The central piece is Order EHA/2899/2011, on transparency and protection of banking services clients (text in BOE), issued under article 48.2 of the former Law 26/1988 on discipline and intervention of credit institutions.

That provision expressly empowers the Minister of Economy and Finance to issue necessary rules to:

  • Oversee relations between credit institutions and their clients.
  • Guarantee maximum transparency in fees, interest rates, pre-contractual and contractual information.
  • Regulate advertising of banking services and products, coordinating with Order EHA/1718/2010 on banking advertising.

Order EHA/2899/2011 explicitly relies on sectoral consumer credit regulations (Law 16/2011) and subsequent developments (such as Order ETD/699/2020 on revolving credit), thus consolidating the Ministry's role as regulator of transparency for consumer credits offered by credit institutions and other financial intermediaries.

4. Coordination with the Bank of Spain and other authorities

Although the Ministry issues transparency orders, the technical application and conduct supervision fall to the Bank of Spain, which issues circulars such as Circular 5/2012, on transparency of banking services and lending responsibility, and Circular 4/2021 on information and complaints. De facto:

  • The Ministry sets the normative framework and transposes directives (consumer credit, payment services, mortgage credit).
  • The Bank of Spain develops and applies technical criteria for transparency supervision and responsible lending.
  • Through rules like Law 7/2017, on alternative dispute resolution in consumer matters (text in BOE), the Government defines which competent authorities accredit dispute resolution entities, coordinating with the ministries of consumer affairs and economy depending on the sector.

5. Representation of Spain in the EU and financial policy

Finally, the Ministry of Economy represents the State in European Union forums and international bodies where directives and regulations on:

  • Consumer credit and mortgage credit.
  • Payment services and financial consumer protection.
  • Prudential regulation of credit institutions and banking union.

On this basis, it promotes bills and royal decree-laws for transposition and adapts ministerial orders, thus closing the circle between economic policy, banking regulation, and consumer defense in consumer credit matters.

What legal requirements does Law 16/2011 establish for the early repayment of consumer credits?

Law 16/2011, on consumer credit contracts, expressly recognizes the consumer's right to early repayment (reimbursement) of their credit and sets the main requirements and limits in its article 30, in connection with pre-contractual and contractual information provisions (among others, articles 10, 16, and 18).

1. Basic right of early repayment

The Law establishes that the consumer may repay early, totally or partially, the obligations arising from the credit contract:

  • At any time during the contract's life, without legal time limitation.
  • Being able to make either a total cancellation or a partial amortization of the outstanding principal.

In case of early repayment, the consumer is entitled to a reduction of the total credit cost, which includes:

  • The interest corresponding to the remaining period.
  • Other associated costs for that period, even if already paid in advance.

That is, the consumer not only can pay earlier but must benefit from the elimination of financing cost for the “unused” credit time.

2. Form of exercise: communication and notice

Law 16/2011:

  • Does not set a minimum notice period for early repayment.
  • Does not impose a rigid form (e.g., official form) for the request.

In practice, the requirement is that the consumer expresses their intention to the lender in a medium that allows proof (paper, email, or other durable medium, according to what has been agreed and transparency regulations). The contract must indicate the applicable procedure for early repayment (articles on contractual information require informing about: the right to early repayment, the procedure, and, if applicable, the compensation and how to calculate it).

3. Compensation to the lender: when applicable and limits

The Law allows that, in certain cases, the lender may charge a compensation for early repayment, but subjects it to very strict conditions:

  • It is only possible if the repayment occurs within a period when the interest rate is fixed.
  • The compensation must be “fair and objectively justified”, for costs directly resulting from the early repayment.
  • The law sets maximum caps:
    • 1% of the amount repaid early if the remaining period until contract end is more than one year.
    • 0.5% of the amount repaid early if the remaining period is equal to or less than one year.

Additionally, a general limit is established: in no case may the compensation exceed the amount of interest the consumer would have paid between the early repayment date and the originally agreed maturity date.

4. Cases where compensation cannot be charged

The Law expressly prohibits charging compensation for early repayment in the following cases:

  • When the repayment is made in compliance with an insurance contract intended to guarantee the credit repayment.
  • In the case of overdraft possibility (for example, credit lines linked to current accounts with possible negative balance).
  • When early repayment occurs during a period in which no debtor interest rate has been set.

5. Refund of linked insurance premiums

Law 16/2011 adds a relevant requirement when the credit is associated with a linked insurance to the credit amortization or whose contracting was a condition to grant the credit or to grant it under certain conditions:

  • Early repayment of the credit entitles the consumer to the refund of the unused portion of the premium by the insurance company.
  • The specific conditions will be governed by the policy itself, but the right to that refund is legally imposed.

6. Practical summary

In summary, the key legal requirements for early repayment of consumer credits according to Law 16/2011 are:

  • Consumer's right to repay totally or partially at any time the credit.
  • Correlative right to a reduction of the total credit cost for the remaining time.
  • Possible compensation to the lender only in fixed-rate credits and within the limits of 1% or 0.5%, and not exceeding the interest that would have accrued.
  • Prohibition of compensation in the specified cases (insurance covering the credit, overdraft possibility, absence of fixed interest rate).
  • Right to the refund of the unused portion of linked insurance premiums when there is linked insurance.
  • Obligation for the lender to inform about this right, the compensation, and the procedure to exercise it in the contract itself.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What is the total cost of repaying 2,500 euros at 22% APR by paying only 50 euros monthly?

Question 1 of 3

What happens if the monthly credit card payment is less than the interest generated during the month?

Question 2 of 3

What right is recognized by Article 30 of Law 16/2011 on consumer credit contracts?

Question 3 of 3

Hola, soy Fren. ¿Cómo te ayudo?