The Police have charged against some participants in a gathering in front of the Ministry of Transport, in Madrid, according to El Confidencial. The outlet also notes that some people have been sprayed with pepper spray and that riot police have separated a group from the rest of the attendees.
The gathering takes place on a day marked by the Urda railway accident and by the explanations of the Minister of Transport, Óscar Puente, who has ruled out resigning. The criticism of his management has also come from UGT, which calls for all the circumstances of the accident to be investigated without anticipating individual responsibilities.
What is known about the police intervention
According to the information published by El Confidencial, the officers established a cordon and separated several people from the rest of the gathering during moments of tension.
The available information does not allow specifying what triggered the charges, how many people participated in the protest, or whether the intervention ended with arrests or injuries. It also does not include a police version of the circumstances of the action.
For now, the facts described must be limited to that intervention in front of the ministerial headquarters. There are not enough elements to attribute violent behavior to the group of attendees as a whole or to identify the organizers.
Puente rules out resigning and places his priority on clarifying the accident
Hours earlier, Puente had appeared before the media in Atocha. Asked about a possible resignation after the Urda accident and the one that occurred in January in Adamuz, he replied that he was not considering it at that moment and that his objective was to clarify what happened and try to resolve the situation.
The head of Transport expressed his shock at the tragedy and described what happened as «inexplicable». His appearance took place while emergency work and the gathering of information about the sequence of the accident continued.
The Ministry's first explanations place one of the central points of the investigation in the authorization to resume circulation after the failure of the safety system. According to Transport sources cited by Europa Press, that instruction made it possible to recover normal movement when restricted circulation should have been applied. This is the explanation offered by the department, not a definitive conclusion of the investigation.
UGT demands that the Ministry's decisions also be examined
The railway section of UGT has questioned that the minister focuses responsibility on Adif control workers before all the circumstances are clarified.
The union considers it necessary to also analyze the organization of work, staffing levels, outsourcing, and management decisions. Its position is that the review of the professionals' actions must be accompanied by an investigation into the resources and the conditions in which they carry out their functions.
This criticism adds a union front to the explanations that Transportes must offer. The existence of a protest before the Ministry and the public questioning by UGT reflect different expressions of pressure on the department.