In the midst of the controversy over the use of the Spanish Constitution allows the Permanent Deputation maintain certain functions while the Cortes are dissolved, a formula that also exists in Portugal. Italy goes further and extends the powers of the outgoing chambers until the new ones meet, while France keeps the Executive during the electoral process without the dissolved Assembly continuing to legislate normally
The dissolution of Parliament does not mean that the Government stops exercising power. In Spain, the Council of Ministers can continue to meet, making decisions within its competencies and announcing measures during the electoral period. The Cortes Generales, however, cease to function as ordinary chambers and their functions are limited to the mechanisms established by the Constitution.
This distribution of powers is not exclusive to the Spanish system. Other countries in the European Union also provide formulas to guarantee institutional continuity between the dissolution of one chamber and the constitution of the next. The difference lies in the scope of the competencies retained by the outgoing Parliament and in the instruments available to control the Executive during that interval.
The constitutions of Portugal and Italy offer two particularly relevant references for examining the Spanish model. The first maintains a parliamentary commission with express functions of government supervision; the second extends the powers of the previous chambers until the new ones meet. France, for its part, allows the Executive to continue in office while elections are held, without keeping the dissolved National Assembly active as an ordinary legislative chamber.
Spain: the Government continues and the Permanent Deputation assumes limited functions
Article 78 of the Spanish Constitution establishes that both the Congress and the Senate have a Permanent Deputation, made up of representatives of the parliamentary groups in proportion to their numerical importance. When the Cortes are dissolved, these bodies continue to exercise their functions until the new chambers are constituted.
The Constitution also assigns them the function of overseeing the powers of the chambers when they are not in session and, in the event of dissolution or expiration of the mandate, to assume the powers provided for in articles 86 and 116. These provisions regulate, respectively, the decree-laws and the states of alarm, exception, and siege, in the terms established by the Constitution itself.
The Permanent Deputation does not equate, therefore, to the Congress in full. It cannot process any legislative initiative nor reproduce the ordinary functioning of the Cortes. Its task is to guarantee a limited institutional continuity during the period when there are no chambers in ordinary operation.
The Executive, for its part, does not automatically cease due to parliamentary dissolution. The specific limitation of the acting Government is activated when its cessation occurs, according to article 21 of the Government Law, which then restricts its management to the ordinary handling of public affairs, with the legally provided exceptions. The dissolution of the Cortes and the cessation of the Government are, therefore, different legal situations.
This distinction is essential during an electoral campaign: the Government can continue exercising its competencies, but the dissolved chambers cannot carry out their ordinary legislative activity and the mechanisms of parliamentary control are conditioned by the attributions of the Permanent Deputation.
Portugal: a permanent commission that can oversee the Government
The Portuguese system presents similarities with the Spanish one, although its Constitution expressly includes some control functions that are worth highlighting.
Article 172 of the Portuguese Constitution states that the dissolution of the Assembly of the Republic does not prevent the mandate of the deputies or the competencies of the Permanent Commission from being maintained until the first meeting of the new Assembly. Article 179 establishes that this commission operates during the dissolution period.
Among its attributions is to oversee compliance with the Constitution and the laws, as well as to monitor the activity of the Government and the Administration. It can also promote the calling of the Assembly when necessary.
The Portuguese Parliament explicitly explains that the dissolution implies the cessation of its normal functioning, including plenary sessions, but not the disappearance of all parliamentary activity. During that interval, the Permanent Commission maintains the functions recognized to it by the Constitution.
The comparison allows identifying a relevant difference in formulation: Portugal explicitly mentions the supervision of governmental activity among the competencies of its Permanent Commission. In Spain, the Permanent Deputation has the task of safeguarding the powers of the chambers and assuming the constitutional powers specifically provided for the dissolution period.
In neither of the two countries does the permanent commission replace the parliamentary plenary without limits.
Italy: the previous chambers retain their powers
The Italian model establishes a distinct parliamentary continuity. Article 61 of the Constitution provides that elections for the new chambers must be held within 70 days following the end of the mandate of the previous ones and that the first meeting must take place, at most, 20 days after the elections. Until then, the powers of the previous chambers are extended.
The Italian formula is not limited to attributing certain competencies to a permanent commission: it expressly contemplates the extension of the powers of the outgoing chambers until the new ones meet.
This does not mean that the chambers continue indefinitely with their ordinary activity nor that the electoral period lacks limits. The constitutional provision regulates the interval between legislatures and guarantees that there is parliamentary continuity until the meeting of the new chambers.
The difference with Spain lies, therefore, in the constitutional technique chosen. The Spanish Constitution assigns certain functions to the permanent deputations; the Italian one establishes the extension of the powers of the previous chambers.
France: the Executive remains, but the dissolved Assembly does not continue legislating
The French Constitution contemplates another formula. Its article 12 allows the President of the Republic to dissolve the National Assembly, after consulting the Prime Minister and the presidents of the chambers, and establishes that general elections must be held between 20 and 40 days after the dissolution.
During the electoral process, the Government does not disappear or cease automatically due to the dissolution of the Assembly. The Executive continues in the exercise of its functions, while the dissolved chamber does not maintain its ordinary legislative activity as if the election had not been called.
The French case thus illustrates a distinction common to parliamentary systems: the continuity of the Executive and the continuity of Parliament are different issues. The former allows the State to continue functioning; the latter depends on the constitutional provisions established for the period between chambers.
The electoral campaign does not suspend the powers of the Government, but it does impose limits
The continuity of the Council of Ministers during a campaign does not imply that the Executive can use institutional resources unrestrictedly to favor its electoral position.
In Spain, Article 50.2 of the Organic Law of the General Electoral Regime prohibits, from the calling of elections until the voting, acts organized or financed directly or indirectly by public authorities that refer to their achievements or accomplishments, or that use images or expressions coinciding or similar to those used in the campaigns of the candidacies. The rule does not establish a general prohibition on making governmental decisions during that period, but rather specific limits on certain institutional actions.
The application of these restrictions can lead to controversies over announcements, appearances, and public acts. On October 15, 2026, the Central Electoral Board opened a sanctioning file against Pedro Sánchez for his appearance on October 6 at La Moncloa, in which he announced measures on housing. The decision referred to a possible infringement of electoral regulations and did not equate to a firm sanction.
Therefore, it is advisable to distinguish between the Government's authority to make decisions within its competencies and the legality of the way it communicates them during an electoral process. The former derives from the constitutional and legal framework that regulates the Executive; the latter must be examined in light of electoral restrictions and the circumstances of each case.
Three models to guarantee institutional continuity
The comparison between Spain, Portugal, and Italy shows that European constitutions resort to different formulas to cover the period between the dissolution of a Parliament and the constitution of the next.
Spain attributes certain functions to the permanent deputations; Portugal maintains a Permanent Commission with express competencies for supervising the Government and the Administration; and Italy extends the powers of the outgoing chambers until the new ones meet. France, for its part, allows the Executive to continue during the electoral process without the dissolved Assembly legislating normally.
The underlying constitutional issue is not, therefore, whether a Government can continue working during a campaign, but how the balance between the continuity of the Administration, parliamentary control, and the neutrality of public powers before the elections is guaranteed. In Spain, that balance is articulated through the limited competencies of the Permanent Deputation, the continuity of the Executive, and the restrictions established by electoral legislation.