Two candidates named Dan Sullivan in Alaska: an initial distinguishes the senator and the case has already reached a judge

The Republican senator who is seeking reelection in Alaska is named Dan S. Sullivan. Another candidate for the same seat is named Dan J. Sullivan. The coincidence has led the first to hand out bracelets with his name as it appears on the ballot and the United States Department of Justice to try to block certification of the result if the incumbent loses

fotonoticia 20260530052842 1920

fotonoticia 20260530052842 1920

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

1 minute

Most read

Elecciones 29N · Encuestas

La media de las encuestas

Media a 2 de noviembre de 2026 · 16 institutos

  • PP30,6 %
  • PSOE27,3 %
  • Vox19,0 %
  • Frente Amplio6,4 %
  • Podemos2,6 %
  • ERC2,4 %
010203040ene 2024jul 2024ene 2025jul 2025ene 2026jul 2026

Media del último estudio de cada instituto en 30 días y su evolución semanal desde el 23J. Partidos con al menos un 2 %.

Todas las encuestas

Elecciones generales del 29 de noviembre · Demócrata

A federal judge dismissed that lawsuit on Sunday, two days before the elections.

Why two Sullivans appear on the same ballot

Alaska holds open primaries from which several contenders from the same party can emerge for the general election. In the Senate race, four candidates have made it to November. Among them are the two Sullivans and Democrat Mary Peltola, a former congresswoman who is trying to wrest an important seat for the House majority from the Republicans.

The controversy dates back months. In June, Alaska's election administration put in writing its concerns about the second candidate's identification and recalled that the initial «S» corresponded to the senator. The incumbent's campaign has opted to show its supporters exactly what they should look for when voting: first the surname, then the first name, and, at the end, the letter S.

What changes with preferential voting

In Alaska, the voter can rank the candidates instead of marking a single box. If no one achieves a majority in the first count, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their ballots go to the next preference still in the race, if the voter indicated it. That is why a first preference for the other Sullivan does not automatically amount to a lost vote for the senator: who that voter placed after him also matters.

The Department of Justice argued that the similarity between the names could confuse voters and asked to halt certification in the event of the senator's defeat. The dismissal on Sunday nullifies that request. The ruling does not predict whether there will be confusion or whom the system will benefit. That can only be seen when the first preferences are counted and, if necessary, the later rounds.