Spanish students record their worst historical result in Reading, Mathematics, and Science in PISA 2025

Spain is below the OECD and European Union average in the three competencies, although it approaches the international average in computational problem solving. The report analyzes Spanish students trained with the curriculum of the LOMLOE, the educational law approved by Sánchez's Government at the end of 2020.

7 minutes

fotonoticia 20260629174319 1920

fotonoticia 20260629174319 1920

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

7 minutes

Most read

The students in Spain return to the classrooms, in those first days when the welcomes weigh much more than the studies. Meanwhile, the one who has been examined is the whole country, because Spain has once again faced this Tuesday the international exam that for more than two decades has become one of the main references to compare the performance of educational systems. The OECD publishes the first results of PISA 2025, an edition in which Science takes on a special prominence and allows checking how the Spanish student body has evolved compared to previous evaluations.

The Programme for International Student Assessment analyzes the competencies of 15-year-old students and Spain has participated in PISA since its first edition, held in 2000, and the study has since become a regular reference to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the educational system. This edition of the OECD evaluation analyzes the Spanish student body trained with the LOMLOE curriculum, the educational law approved by the Government of Pedro Sánchez at the end of 2020.

The evaluation is structured around three main areas: Mathematics, Reading, and Science. In each cycle, one of them occupies the place of main competency, which allows for a deeper analysis. In PISA 2025, that role corresponds to Science, while Mathematics and Reading are also part of the evaluation as secondary competencies.

The OECD explains that the tests aim to measure the students' ability to apply their knowledge and skills in situations they may encounter outside the school environment. Therefore, PISA should not be interpreted as a conventional exam on the syllabus studied in class, but as a comparative evaluation of the capabilities that students have developed by the time they reach approximately the end of compulsory education.

The 2025 edition also incorporates novelties. The study includes for the first time an international assessment of foreign language, focused on English, while the innovative domain is learning in the digital world. This last evaluation aims to analyze how students use digital tools to solve problems and how they regulate their own learning in those environments. The results of the different parts are not necessarily published at the same time.

Fiasco in Reading, Mathematics, and Science

Once the results are known, Spanish students aged 15 have obtained in PISA 2025 their worst historical results in Reading, Mathematics, and Science.

According to the results of the latest PISA Report, collected by Europa Press, Spanish students are half a school year behind the OECD average in Reading.

Spain has achieved 451 points in this competency, ten less than its previous historical minimum, recorded in 2006 with 461 points. The score also represents a decrease of 23 points compared to 2022, when it reached 474.

Spanish students are eight points below the average of the European Union, which is at 459, and ten below the OECD average, which is 461 points. Between 2015 and 2025, Spain has lost a total of 45 points in Reading.

In Mathematics, Spanish students already recorded their worst historical result in PISA 2022, with 473 points. In 2025, the score has fallen to 457 points, 16 less than in the previous edition.

The Spanish score is six points below both the OECD average and the overall European Union average, which are both at 463 points. Since 2015, Spain has lost almost 30 points in Mathematics and has moved away from the OECD average, which is moderating its decline.

The results have not been positive in Science either. Spanish students have obtained 477 points, eight less than in PISA 2022, when they reached 485, and six less than in 2018, the edition in which Spain had recorded its worst result in this subject so far, with 483 points.

Spain also falls below the averages of the OECD and the European Union in scientific competency. Spanish students are four points below the community average and five below the OECD average. Since 2015, the country has lost 16 points in Science and has widened its distance from the international organization.

Spain approaches the average in computational problem solving

PISA 2025 shows, on the other hand, that Spain is approaching the OECD average in computational problem solving. Spanish students have achieved 499 points, one more than the OECD average, which is at 499, and four more than the total of the European Union, which is at 495 points.

The Community of Madrid leads the performance in this competition with 515 points. Following are Asturias, with 512; Cantabria, with 510; Castilla y León, with 509; Aragón, with 506; Galicia, with 505; Castilla-La Mancha, with 503; La Rioja, with 500, and Navarra, also with 500.

Below the Spanish average are the Basque Country, with 498 points; Balearic Islands, with 497; Extremadura, with 494; Canary Islands, with 488; Murcia, with 485; Andalusia, with 483; Valencian Community, with 474; Ceuta, with 440, and Melilla, with 416.

Catalonia, excluded from the international report due to its high percentage of students removed from the test, has obtained 523 points.

In this edition, the ninth in which Spanish students participate, 956 educational centers and nearly 30,000 students have taken part in the main study. The sample represents the total population of students aged 15 to 16 from all communities and autonomous cities.

The international PISA results maintain their downward trend

The PISA results also reflect a decreasing trend in the international sphere. The most pronounced decline occurs in Reading, followed by Mathematics and Science.

The OECD average stands at 486 points in Science, compared to 491 in 2022; at 466 points in Reading, compared to 482 in the previous edition, and at 469 points in Mathematics, compared to 480 recorded in 2022.

The rate of excluded students in Spain has reached 7.89%, above the 5% set by PISA in its standards. After conducting a bias analysis, the OECD has concluded that the Spanish data can be fully used for making international comparisons and analyzing its evolution.

However, two autonomous communities have recorded an "especially high" exclusion percentage: Catalonia, with 23%, and the Region of Murcia, with 13%.

The OECD has decided to exclude the Catalan data from the international reports. The data from Murcia has been included, although accompanied by a warning about the potential risk of bias due to overestimation.

The Ministry of Education, Vocational Training and Sports, with prior knowledge of the OECD, has chosen to incorporate the results of Catalonia, but separated from those of the rest of the communities. It has also added a note to warn that these data should not be used to establish comparisons with other territories or with previous editions of PISA, due to the fact that the examined sample does not represent the entire Catalan student body.

In the case of the Region of Murcia, the results appear alongside those of the other autonomous communities. However, a note warns that comparisons with other territories or editions should be interpreted with caution due to the possible risk of bias.

Madrid leads in Mathematics and Science and ranks second in Reading

Asturias achieves the best autonomous result in Spain in Reading, with 471 points. Following are the Community of Madrid, with 469; Castilla y León, with 466; Cantabria, Castilla-La Mancha, La Rioja, and Aragón, all with 461 points. These communities exceed the average of the European Union, set at 459.

Galicia, with 454 points, is above the Spanish average of 451, but does not reach the community average. Extremadura matches the national average with 451 points.

Below the Spanish average in Reading are the Region of Murcia, with 448 points; Canary Islands, with 445; Andalusia, Balearic Islands, and Navarre, with 441; Community of Valencia, with 424; Basque Country, with 419; Ceuta, with 397, and Melilla, with 379. Catalonia, excluded from international reports due to its high percentage of exclusions, has obtained 473 points.

In Mathematics, the Community of Madrid tops the results with 477 points. It is followed by Castilla y León, with 472; Cantabria, with 470; Asturias, with 469, and Galicia, with 466. All of them are above the OECD and European Union average, set at 463 points.

Also exceeding the Spanish average of 457 points are Castilla-La Mancha, La Rioja, Aragón, and Navarre, all with 462 points, in addition to the Basque Country.

Below the national average are Extremadura, with 454 points; Balearic Islands, with 449; Murcia, with 447; Canary Islands and Andalusia, with 442; Community of Valencia, with 435; Ceuta, with 405, and Melilla, with 395. Catalonia has obtained 474 points in Mathematics.

In Science, the students with the highest scores have been those from the Community of Madrid, with 495 points. They also exceed the OECD averages, of 482 points; of the European Union, of 481, and of Spain, of 477, Castilla y León, with 493; Asturias, with 492; Cantabria, with 490; Galicia, with 486; Castilla-La Mancha, with 485; La Rioja, with 484, and Aragón, with 482.

Below the Spanish average are Extremadura, with 473 points; Navarra, with 472; Balearic Islands, with 471; Murcia, with 470; Canary Islands, with 469; Andalusia, with 462; Basque Country, with 459; Valencian Community, with 450; Ceuta, with 420, and Melilla, with 405. Catalonia has reached a score of 502.

An indicator that goes beyond a ranking

The importance of PISA does not reside solely in knowing which country appears above or below another. The OECD uses its results to study the evolution of educational systems, the differences among students, and the relationship between performance and various factors related to the learning environment.

Moreover, the scores should not be interpreted as an exact mathematical ranking. The OECD itself warns that the results come from samples of students and are subject to margins of statistical uncertainty. Therefore, the positions of the countries are presented within certain ranges, and small differences in scores do not necessarily imply statistically significant differences.

The 2025 edition includes the participation of more than 90 countries and economies and brings together more than 760,000 students. The OECD presents PISA as the largest international comparative assessment of 15-year-old students. Spain participates with a national sample that allows placing its results in the international context and tracking its evolution compared to previous cycles.

The interest of the data known from today is, therefore, to verify what happens with the three core competencies and, especially, with Science, the area that the OECD has chosen as the focus of this edition.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

In what stage of parliamentary processing are the recent educational reforms in Spain?

What are the competencies and functions of the Ministry of Education regarding the evaluation of educational systems?

In the Spanish legal system, the evaluation of the educational system is a shared competence between the State and the autonomous communities, but the Ministry of Education (currently Education, Vocational Training, and Sports) has a clearly defined role in setting the basic framework and general coordination.

The Organic Law 2/2006, on Education (LOE), amended by Organic Law 3/2020 (LOMLOE), dedicates its Title VI to the evaluation of the educational system and establishes several key principles:

  • Evaluation is conceived as a fundamental element for improvement of education and to increase the transparency of the system.
  • It must cover multiple areas: student learning, teacher activity, educational processes, management function, operation of educational centers, inspection, and the educational administrations themselves.
  • It is expressly prohibited to use the results to publish rankings of centers or individual assessments of students; its purpose is diagnostic, formative, and for improvement.

Within this framework, the LOE assigns at the state level a series of specific functions:

  • The general evaluation of the educational system is entrusted to a specialized state body (historically the Evaluation Institute, today the National Institute for Educational Evaluation), which acts in collaboration with the autonomous evaluation bodies. Its mission is to design and coordinate major national and international evaluations (such as PISA), define frameworks, indicators, and methodologies, and prepare result reports.
  • The State must prepare and present annually to Parliament a synthesis report on the functioning of the educational system, based on:
    • general and diagnostic evaluations,
    • other evaluation tests conducted,
    • and the main indicators of Spanish education.
  • Educational administrations, including the state one, must provide statistical data and make public indicators that facilitate transparency, good management, and educational research.

The LOMLOE strengthens and specifies this role on two levels:

  • It foresees that in the last year of Primary Education and Compulsory Secondary Education, general system evaluations on key student competencies are carried out on a sample and multi-year basis. These tests:
    • have an informative, formative, and guiding character for the centers,
    • are informative for students and families,
    • and serve the Ministry and autonomous communities to identify strengths and weaknesses of the system.
  • It regulates again the internal diagnostic evaluations of centers (for example, in 4th grade of Primary and 2nd grade of ESO). Here the Ministry:
    • establishes, with the communities, a common evaluation framework,
    • implements this framework through the National Institute for Educational Evaluation and the autonomous bodies,
    • and ensures that the approach is fundamentally formative and not punitive.

Beyond tests and statistics, the Ministry influences the evaluation of centers and systems through educational inspection. A royal decree approved in 2026 on educational inspection, according to the official note from the Ministry itself, aims to:

  • Regulate educational inspection globally, including its evaluation, access to the inspector body, its training, and professional development.
  • Strengthen the functions of advice and guidance to management teams and the entire educational community, with principles of transparency, independence of technical criteria, and defense of fundamental rights and the best interests of the child.
  • Update the basic state framework allowing autonomous communities to configure their own organizational inspection models within that general framework.

In practice, all this translates into the Ministry of Education:

  • Defines the basic framework for external and internal evaluation of the system (types of tests, periodicity, competencies evaluated, use of results).
  • Coordinates and conducts general evaluations of the educational system at the state level and participates in international ones, in close collaboration with the autonomous communities.
  • Establishes indicators and information systems for monitoring the quality, equity, and results of the educational system as a whole.
  • Promotes the evaluation of the functioning of centers, management function, and inspection, through basic regulations and specific programs, with a continuous improvement approach.
  • Is accountable before the General Courts on the state and evolution of the educational system based on these evaluation exercises.

In summary, the Ministry's competencies in educational evaluation are not focused on “examining” each individual center, but on designing, coordinating, and exploiting the system's evaluation devices, ensuring their coherence throughout the territory, and linking them to the improvement of educational policies and the functioning of centers.

Could you detail the specific role of the National Institute for Educational Evaluation within this evaluation system? What types of reports or indicators does the Ministry prepare from the evaluations to present to Parliament? How exactly do the Ministry and the autonomous communities coordinate in the design and application of diagnostic evaluations in centers?

What requirements must countries meet to participate in the OECD's PISA report?

The PISA report (Programme for International Student Assessment) is an international evaluation coordinated by the OECD that measures the competencies of 15-year-old students in reading, mathematics, and science. For a country or economy to participate, it must meet a series of technical, organizational, and political requirements that ensure the results are internationally comparable and methodologically sound.

1. Political and institutional commitment

The first requirement is the formal commitment of the government or the responsible educational authority. This involves:

  • Signing participation agreements with the OECD and the international consortium that manages PISA.
  • Accepting the common rules of design, application, and analysis, without introducing unilateral changes to the tests.
  • Designating a National Center or responsible unit (usually within the ministry of education or an evaluation institute) and a national PISA coordinator.

Without this commitment, the OECD does not accept participation, because continuity, technical quality, and cooperation with other countries are essential for comparability.

2. Technical and methodological requirements

The OECD sets a very strict statistical and methodological protocol. Among the main requirements are:

  • Clear target population: 15-year-old enrolled students, regardless of the grade they are in. The country must be able to identify this population in its records and educational centers.
  • Minimum sample size: a sufficiently large sample of centers and students is required to obtain representative estimates at the national level (and, if desired, by regions). It usually involves several thousand students.
  • Probabilistic sampling design: the selection of centers and students must follow a random and stratified design approved by the international consortium. Convenience samples are not accepted.
  • Minimum participation rates: the OECD sets thresholds for participation of centers and students (for example, a minimum percentage of selected centers that finally administer the test and students present on exam day). If not met, the country may have “non-comparable” results.
  • Compliance with schedule and protocols: tests must be administered within the established period for the PISA cycle (usually a couple of months) and following detailed instructions on timing, materials, supervision, etc.

All these elements are reviewed and validated internationally; countries send their sampling framework, procedures, and raw data, which are audited before including the results in the reports.

3. Operational capacity and resources

Participating in PISA requires that the country has certain administrative and technical capacity:

  • A national team capable of coordinating with the OECD, training administrators, managing logistics, and resolving incidents in centers.
  • Financial resources to cover participation: registration fees, instrument adaptation, printing or IT deployment, training and remuneration of staff, scoring (if applicable), and other operational tasks.
  • Adequate infrastructure for the current application format (in recent cycles, mainly digital): computers or devices, sufficient connection, technical support, and appropriate exam conditions.

The OECD offers technical assistance but does not replace the country's responsibility to set up the necessary internal “machinery.”

4. Linguistic and cultural adaptation

Another requirement is to ensure that the tests are linguistically and culturally equivalent:

  • Translate the booklets and questionnaires from PISA's reference languages (English and French, and in some cases German) into the country's evaluation languages.
  • Follow a very rigorous translation and verification protocol: independent double translation, reconciliation, back-translation, and review by the international consortium.
  • Adapt certain contextual elements when appropriate (for example, proper names, currency formats), always without altering the difficulty or the construct being measured.

This phase is critical: if the translation is not equivalent, results may be biased and the OECD may require corrections or, in extreme cases, exclude data.

5. Ethical and confidentiality compliance

Finally, countries must respect ethical and data protection standards:

  • Guarantee the confidentiality of students and centers; data are used only for statistical and research purposes.
  • Obtain necessary authorizations according to national legislation (consent from families or centers, when required).
  • Avoid punitive uses or “naming and shaming” of specific centers based directly on PISA databases.

Overall, more than a simple test, PISA is a project of great technical and political complexity. A country wishing to participate must demonstrate that it can meet its methodological standards, ensure data quality, and sustain participation over time, so that results are truly comparable and useful for educational policies.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What is the main competency assessed in PISA 2025?

Question 1 of 3

Since what year has Spain participated in the PISA report?

Question 2 of 3

What two new features does the PISA 2025 edition include?

Question 3 of 3

Hola, soy Fren. ¿Cómo te ayudo?