Vivas proposes to rethink the EU-Morocco collaboration "if the border is not respected"

I propose this one, with a **journalistic, institutional tone and European context**: The Ceuta president demands from the Eurochamber a "unequivocal" position on the European nature of the border, requests specific treatment for Ceuta and Melilla, and demands greater involvement from Brussels in light of migratory pressure and the strategic relationship with Rabat.

4 minutes

20260908 EP 210316A LD1 0010

20260908 EP 210316A LD1 0010

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

4 minutes

Most read

In front of a packed press room in the European Parliament, as happens on few occasions in Brussels, the president of the autonomous city of Ceuta, Juan Jesús Vivas, has opened the door for the European Union to change its collaboration policy with Morocco "if the border is not respected". A relationship that keeps the continent as the main trading partner of Rabat, with merchandise exchanges that exceeded 50 billion euros in 2023.

The warning from the Ceuta president comes at a time when the relationship between the European Union and Morocco maintains an important economic, commercial, and strategic dimension. Precisely for this reason, Vivas has placed the management of the border and the respect for its European condition at the center of his demands before the community institutions.

"A collaboration policy should not be maintained if the borders are not respected", Vivas has replied, asking the members of the Eurochamber to take a "unequivocal stance next week, making it clear that the borders of Ceuta are European".

The president wants that position to materialize in a "specific treatment for the two autonomous cities on the border with Africa that serves as a lever to guarantee stability". Likewise, he has requested a reform of the Migration and Asylum Pact, being "the only community land border with the African continent".

The commercial relationship with Morocco, in focus

When questioned upon leaving about that "collaboration" between the European Union and Morocco, the president has focused on the trade agreements that both parties maintain "and are even negotiating at this moment". The leader believes that these agreements cannot be maintained while there is no relationship of respect towards a partner that raises doubts. "It is impossible for a mobilization of 80,000 people to occur without Morocco being aware", he has stated from Brussels.

The economic dimension of the relationship between both parties turns, precisely, this issue into one of the main elements on which Vivas intends to draw the attention of the community institutions. The European Union maintains a commercially significant relationship with Morocco, while Ceuta demands that the strategic dimension of the border also have a political and financial reflection. In this sense, the president of Ceuta has positioned the management of the border not only as a matter linked to migration policy but also as an issue directly related to security, stability, and the very presence of the European Union at one of its external borders.

Vivas points to the Moroccan Police

In fact, the president has gone a step further by reminding the international press that "there are reports from the National Police showing how the Moroccan Police accompanied citizens to the border". "It is not the first time they do this and use our border to destabilize the city", he has stated.

Vivas's words thus place Morocco's behavior at the center of the explanations regarding the migratory pressure suffered by Ceuta. The president believes that the scale of the movements recorded at the border requires a European response and that the Union cannot remain on the sidelines of a situation that directly affects one of its external borders. Vivas's request to the community institutions, therefore, involves reinforcing the European consideration of Ceuta and establishing mechanisms that allow for responses to situations of migratory pressure that, in his view, transcend the capacity of action of the autonomous city itself.

In this scenario, the Ceuta president has demanded that the European condition of the border translates into greater institutional involvement from Brussels, both from a political and financial perspective.

In the afternoon, the president will address the European Commission to request "that it gets involved". What, in practice, means "that there is a permanent presence of Europe at the border".

The petition seeks that the European response is not limited to a political statement, but also has a concrete manifestation on the ground. For Vivas, the situation in Ceuta requires a greater presence of community institutions in a border that he considers strategic for the whole of the European Union. Likewise, he has requested that it be financially involved "to reinforce the border and address the humanitarian emergency regarding the reception of unaccompanied minors".

This last issue occupies a central place in the demands of the autonomous city. The arrival of unaccompanied minors represents an added pressure on Ceuta's resources, which claims that the cost of reception and management of this situation should also be addressed from a European perspective.

The claim occurs in the midst of a debate on the application of the Migration and Asylum Pact, whose implementation must articulate a common response from member states to situations of migratory pressure at the external borders of the Union. Vivas believes that the geographical position of Ceuta justifies a specific treatment within the community framework, precisely because of its condition as the land border of the European Union with Africa. A specificity that, according to the president, should serve as an instrument to guarantee both the stability of the city and the protection of the community's external border.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What is the current status of the processing of the Migration and Asylum Pact reform in the European Parliament?

The processing of the new Migration and Asylum Pact in the European Parliament is closed: the main legislative package was definitively approved by the European Parliament in April 2024, subsequently adopted by the Council in May 2024, and came into effect in all Member States on June 12, 2026. As of today, the focus is no longer on the approval of the rules in Parliament, but on their practical implementation and on some complementary pieces (such as the reform of the return directive) that are being negotiated separately.

1. What exactly did the European Parliament approve and when

According to the official press release of the European Parliament dated April 10, 2024, titled “MEPs approve the new Migration and Asylum Pact”, the Parliament adopted in Plenary ten legislative texts that comprehensively reform the European migration and asylum policy. Among others, these include:

  • The Regulation on asylum and migration management, which replaces the old Dublin system and establishes a solidarity mechanism among Member States.
  • The Crisis and force majeure Regulation, to manage sudden increases in arrivals and situations of migrant instrumentalization.
  • The Screening Regulation at the border and the Asylum Procedure Regulation, which introduce controls and accelerated procedures at external borders.
  • The reform of the Eurodac system, which expands and strengthens the asylum and migration database.
  • The Reception Conditions Directive, the Qualification Regulation, and the EU Resettlement Framework.

At the same stage, Parliament also approved its position on other system elements, such as the harmonization of protection criteria and reception standards. The vote on April 10, 2024, marks the closure of the first reading and, de facto, the end of the parliamentary processing of the core Pact package.

2. Formal adoption by the Council and entry into force

The European Commission details in its communication of June 12, 2024 on the Common Implementation Plan of the Pact that, following the political agreement of December 2023, the package was:

  • Approved by the European Parliament on April 10, 2024.
  • Formally adopted by the Council on May 14, 2024.
  • The legal instruments of the Pact entered into force on June 11, 2024.

Subsequently, another Commission note dated June 11, 2026, titled “The Migration and Asylum Pact enters into force on June 12”, confirms that on June 12, 2026 the Pact begins to apply in all Member States. That is, the legislative phase in Parliament and the Council is concluded and the system has moved to the application phase.

3. What remains pending or parallel to the Pact

The Commission itself, in its document of “Questions and Answers on the Migration and Asylum Pact” from May 2024, explained that alongside the core of the Pact, there were two legislative proposals still pending at that time: the reform of the return directive and the directive on long-term residents.

In the following months, institutions have mainly advanced on the return directive and on rules linked to countries of origin and safe third countries. For example:

  • In December 2025, Parliament and Council announced a provisional political agreement on a new regulation of “safe third country” and on the list of safe countries of origin, with planned application linked to June 2026, but emphasizing that the agreement must still be formally adopted by both institutions.
  • Press releases from the Council and Parliament in December 2025 stress that this agreement on safe countries and the reform of return rules complements the Pact but follows its own legislative path.

Therefore, although the “Migration and Asylum Pact” as a package is already approved and in force, negotiations and regulatory developments continue on specific pieces (returns, safe countries, etc.) that orbit around the new framework but do not reopen the processing of the Pact itself.

4. Conclusion: current status in the European Parliament

In summary, strictly regarding the European Parliament:

  • The main legislative processing of the Pact concluded with the Plenary vote on April 10, 2024.
  • Since then, Parliament has taken on a role of political oversight and promotion of implementation, and negotiating complementary rules (such as the return directive), but there is no new “Pact” currently under approval.
  • Since June 12, 2026, the Pact is part of the applicable EU law, and the debate focuses on how Member States are applying it and on additional adjustments to the asylum and return framework.

In short, it is no longer accurate to speak of “processing” of the Pact in the European Parliament: the legislative process has ended and a phase of application and implementation has begun, with additional reforms on return and safe countries still under negotiation or pending formal adoption.

Can you break down one by one the ten legislative acts of the Migration and Asylum Pact and what each changes compared to the previous framework? What room for maneuver do Member States, including Spain, now have to apply the Migration and Asylum Pact more or less restrictively? How is Spain adapting its internal legislation (asylum and immigration) to the new European Pact and what is the status of those draft bills in the Cortes?

What are the powers of the president of the autonomous city of Ceuta according to Spanish legislation?

The powers of the President of the Autonomous City of Ceuta are fundamentally determined by Organic Law 1/1995, the Statute of Autonomy of Ceuta, which configures this figure as head of the local-autonomous executive and, at the same time, as mayor of the city. Based on the statutory text and state local government legislation, a clear block of political, representative, normative, and government organization functions can be reconstructed.

Political and government leadership

The Statute establishes that the president of the city:

  • Presides over the Assembly of Ceuta and the Government Council, directing and coordinating the activity of the latter. This makes them the highest authority of the executive power in the city.
  • Leads the general political action of the City, in line with the statutory design that attributes to the Government Council the direction of Ceuta's policy and the exercise of executive and administrative functions; the president is the one who drives and coordinates that action.
  • They are the immediate political responsible before the Assembly, which can demand their responsibility through a motion of censure and control their actions through the parliamentary control mechanisms provided in the Statute and the Assembly's Rules.

Institutional representation

The Statute provides that the president holds the supreme representation of the City. This implies:

  • Representation of the Autonomous City of Ceuta before the State, other autonomous communities and autonomous cities, as well as before institutions and international organizations under the terms allowed by the Constitution and laws.
  • Representation of the City in the signing of cooperation agreements and accords that the Assembly is empowered to approve with autonomous communities and with Melilla.
  • Since the Statute itself specifies that the president also holds the status of mayor, they also assume the representation of the municipal administration of Ceuta before third parties, within the framework of basic local government legislation.

Normative and regulatory powers

Although the main normative power corresponds to the Assembly of Ceuta, the president participates in this area in several ways:

  • Through the Government Council they preside over, they promote the drafting of draft regulations submitted to the Assembly (own city regulations, organizational rules, and other provisions within Ceuta's competencies).
  • The Statute recognizes the City, in its article 21, the regulatory normative power in matters within its competence; the Government Council can develop the Assembly's rules by regulation, and the president directs this function and is politically responsible for it.
  • As the highest representative of the City and head of the executive, the president is responsible for the publication and execution of general scope rules and provisions through the "Official Gazette of the City of Ceuta," a normative publicity body expressly provided for in the Statute.

Organization of the Government Council

The statutory text specifies several very relevant organizational powers:

  • Appointment and dismissal of the councilors who make up the Government Council, who are freely appointed and removed by the president, who must report to the Assembly.
  • Possibility to temporarily delegate their own executive functions to certain members of the Council, allowing modulation of the internal distribution of responsibilities.
  • Calling and presiding over the sessions of the Government Council and the Assembly, as well as setting the agenda for both, under the terms provided by the Assembly's Rules and the internal rules of the Council itself.

Relations with the Assembly and the National Government

Institutionally, the president:

  • Can raise the question of confidence before the Assembly of Ceuta on their program or a general policy statement; if confidence is denied, they must resign, triggering a new presidential election process.
  • Is subject to the motion of censure mechanism, by which the Assembly can demand their responsibility, simultaneously appointing a new president.
  • Participates, through the channels provided in the Statute, in the normative initiative before the General Courts, coordinating with the Assembly the request to the Government for the presentation of bills or the sending of legislative proposals to the Congress.
  • Is the main political interlocutor with the National Government regarding transfers of functions and services, financing, and execution of state policies in Ceuta.

Security, public order, and coordination with the State

Article 21 of the Statute includes, among the city's competencies, the surveillance and protection of buildings and facilities and the local police, under the terms of basic state legislation (article 149.1.29 of the Constitution). In view of this:

  • The president, as mayor and head of the executive, exercises the political leadership over the local police, within the framework set by the Organic Law on security forces and bodies and the state local government regulations.
  • The Statute expressly provides that, by joint initiative of the president and the Government delegate, bodies may be established to develop and control the execution of joint plans and programs of works and services. This clause reflects a function of institutional coordination with the General State Administration also relevant in sensitive areas such as security, civil protection, or management of strategic infrastructures.

Overall, the president of the Autonomous City of Ceuta is a hybrid figure who accumulates functions of autonomous president and mayor, with a strong role in political leadership, institutional representation, and organization of the local-autonomous government, always within the framework set by the Statute and basic State legislation.

What laws currently regulate the management of the border between Ceuta and Morocco?

The management of the border between Ceuta and Morocco does not depend on a single law, but on a normative block combining Spanish legislation, bilateral agreements with Morocco, and the European Schengen framework. Below are the basic pieces that currently structure this regime.

1. Spanish framework on immigration and asylum
  • Organic Law 4/2000, on the rights and freedoms of foreigners in Spain (consolidated text). This is the so-called “Immigration Law” and establishes:
    • Definition of foreigner, State competencies in immigration, and principles of migration policy.
    • Regime of entries, returns, expulsions, and detention.
    • A specific regime of border rejection in Ceuta and Melilla in its tenth additional provision. According to Demócrata's analysis (article on hot returns), it allows rejecting anyone detected:
      • On the border line of Ceuta or Melilla,
      • while attempting irregular entry,
      • trying to overcome physical containment elements (fence, etc.).
      The Supreme Court, in a ruling of July 8, 2026, has specified that this regime cannot be applied to those arriving by swimming if there is no physical containment element in the sea; in those cases, the ordinary return procedure of article 58 of the same Law applies.
  • Immigration Regulation (Royal Decree 557/2011 and successive amendments): details visas, permits, returns, and detention, also applicable in Ceuta.
  • Law 12/2009, regulating the right to asylum and subsidiary protection (BOE-A-2009-17242). It orders how asylum is requested and processed, also in border crossings and transit zones. According to Demócrata's analysis, even in the context of rejection or return, an international protection request must be able to be formalized, which suspends the return until its admissibility is resolved.
2. Citizen Security Law and special regime of Ceuta
  • Organic Law 4/2015, on the protection of citizen security (BOE-A-2015-3442). It regulates the actions of the Security Forces and Bodies and the sanctioning regime. The Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court have interpreted this law in relation to the specific border rejection of Ceuta and Melilla, conditioning its constitutionality on respect for:
    • Individual identification of the affected persons.
    • Real possibility of requesting asylum.
    • Enhanced protection of minors and vulnerable persons.
    The constitutional and Supreme Court rulings cited by the BOE and the Interior Ministry's note delimit the legal framework of these practices at the Ceuta border.
3. Spanish–Moroccan agreements on movement and readmission
  • Agreement between the Kingdom of Spain and the Kingdom of Morocco on the movement of persons, transit, and readmission of foreigners illegally entered, signed in Madrid on February 13, 1992 (provisional application; entry into force). According to the extract obtained by InstitutionalSearcher:
    • Obliges the border authorities of the requested State to readmit nationals of third countries who have illegally entered the other State from its territory (arts. 1 and 2).
    • Regulates transit for expulsion of nationals of third countries (arts. 6–8).
    • Creates a Spanish–Moroccan Joint Committee to resolve disputes, monitor the application of the Agreement, and organize cooperation in border control (art. 11).
    This treaty is the legal basis for many returns from Ceuta to Morocco and is used in coordination with the Immigration Law.
  • Other recent bilateral agreements (border cooperation, integrated management, projects with the IOM, etc.), published in the BOE and cited in searches, complement daily operations but rely on the basic framework above.
4. European framework: Schengen and EU external border
  • Instrument of ratification of the Agreement on Spain's accession to the Schengen Agreement implementation Convention, made in Bonn on June 25, 1991 (BOE-A-1994-7586). It integrates Spain into the Schengen area and defines, among other aspects:
    • The bodies with competencies in cross-border pursuit and police cooperation.
    • The status of Ceuta and Melilla as part of the external border of the EU, which explains the “double filter” that the Government describes in its notes: control at the land border with Morocco and Schengen control on departure to the Peninsula.
  • On this basis, EU regulations on external borders, surveillance (EUROSUR), and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) apply, which are not always fully published in the BOE but govern technical cooperation, deployment of resources, and control standards at a border like Ceuta's.
5. Sectoral and operational regulations
  • Orders and resolutions that enable and regulate the El Tarajal border post and its transformation into a “smart border,” with investments in control systems, according to official Interior Ministry notes from 2024.
  • Interior Ministry orders and Council of Ministers agreements that create coordination authorities to address irregular immigration in areas such as the Strait and Alborán, which influence the devices on Ceuta.
  • Health and border control regulations (for example, on external health or specific inspections) that apply to the flows of people crossing the Ceuta border.

Overall, the border between Ceuta and Morocco is currently managed by combining: the Immigration Law and its additional provision for Ceuta/Melilla, the asylum law, the Organic Law on citizen security, the 1992 readmission agreement with Morocco, and the Schengen and EU external border framework, complemented by more specific regulatory and operational agreements.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What has Juan Jesús Vivas requested from the European Union regarding the Ceuta border?

Question 1 of 3

What is one of the main reasons Vivas asks for specific treatment for Ceuta in the EU?

Question 2 of 3

What does Vivas say about the actions of the Moroccan police at the border?

Question 3 of 3

Hola, soy Fren. ¿Cómo te ayudo?