The advance of the general elections to November 29 does not, by itself, represent an immediate blow to the Spanish economy. The analyses prepared by Citi and JP Morgan after the announcement point out that the impact in the very short term will be limited and focus attention on what happens after the polls: the ability of the next Government to legislate, the policies on housing and immigration, and the regulatory framework that affects companies and banks.
JP Morgan considers that the early elections will have "limited repercussions on the economic outlook in the very short term." The entity points out that the macroeconomic data and the growth drivers that are already functioning will carry more weight than the electoral announcement itself.
Citi reaches a similar conclusion regarding the short term. Its analysis also does not expect relevant immediate consequences on activity, although it identifies several areas where a political change could have medium-term effects. Among them are banking, housing, and population evolution.
Citi points to banking, housing, and immigration
Citi's analysis focuses on other effects that a political change could produce. The entity considers that a hypothetical Government led by the PP could be perceived by investors as more favorable to banking consolidation and a more favorable fiscal framework for the sector.
Citi recalls that the current Government previously opposed BBVA's takeover bid for Sabadell and suggests that a PP Executive that did not depend on Catalan independentist parties could have a different position regarding the consolidation of the banking sector. The entity also analyzes the future of the special tax on banking and the consequences that a change of Government could have on the roadmap for state participation in CaixaBank.
But banking is not the only area that Citi identifies as relevant. Its analysis places housing and immigration alongside economic policy among the issues that will concentrate the electoral debate. For the entity, the changes that may occur in the medium term both in population growth and in housing demand could ultimately have effects on the growth of deposits and loans.
The housing appears thus connected with two different economic variables. On one hand, it constitutes one of the main political issues of the campaign. On the other, its evolution affects the demand for financing and, therefore, a part of the banking business that Citi analyzes in its report.
JP Morgan puts immigration at the center of growth
The element that acquires special relevance in JP Morgan's analysis is immigration. The entity considers that the expansion of the active population driven by the arrival of foreign workers is one of the engines that are sustaining the growth of the Spanish economy.
The investment bank points out that this factor, along with the investment financed by the Next Generation EU funds, may have enough weight to eclipse the aggregate effect that political uncertainty has on activity. That is to say, the electoral call does not appear as the main conditioning factor for growth in the short term.
Featured story
The CES affirms that immigration does not replace Spaniards and strengthens the economy.
4 minutes
This reading introduces a relevant variable in the electoral debate. Decisions about immigration do not only affect the demographic or labor sphere: for JP Morgan, they also have a direct relationship with the growth capacity of the Spanish economy through the active population.
The analysis adds that political fragmentation and the "regulatory inertia" of recent years may have hindered private investment. At this point, the holding of elections may have an effect different from the purely electoral: the subsequent formation of a Government with a parliamentary majority could reduce uncertainty about its ability to pass laws.
The challenge lies in the policies that come after the polls
The two analyses therefore agree in separating the immediate effect of the elections from their possible subsequent consequences. The call for November 29 does not change by itself the engines that are sustaining activity, but the result may determine the framework in which economic policies will be developed during the next legislature.
For JP Morgan, one of the decisive elements will be that the next Executive achieves sufficient legislative capacity to reduce the uncertainty that has accompanied parliamentary fragmentation. The entity links that capacity with the prospects for private investment and with the possibility of advancing new measures.
In parallel, the analysis from Citi points out that the decisions of the next Government may modify the regulatory environment of specific sectors. In banking, the focus is on mergers, the specific tax, and state participation in CaixaBank. In the economy in general, housing and immigration appear as two of the issues with the greatest capacity to condition medium-term prospects.
Immigration thus occupies a singular position in both analyses. It is not just a matter that could mark the political debate of the campaign: in the case of JP Morgan, the arrival of the active population is part of the factors that are driving growth. The investment bank also warns that this engine is combined with investment from European funds to sustain activity.