How much does the general strike of 11-N cost: estimates from business organizations

CEOE and CEPYME warn of the harm the call may cause to companies, especially small and medium-sized ones, while CCOO and UGT argue that business margins make it possible to improve wages

coste huelga general

coste huelga general

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

2 minutes

Most read

Elecciones 29N · Encuestas

La media de las encuestas

Media a 9 de noviembre de 2026 · 14 institutos

  • PP31,5 %
  • PSOE26,7 %
  • Vox19,1 %
  • Frente Amplio6,5 %
  • ERC2,5 %
01020304050ene 2024jul 2024ene 2025jul 2025ene 2026jul 2026

Media del último estudio de cada instituto en 30 días y su evolución semanal desde el 23J. Partidos con al menos un 2 %.

Todas las encuestas

Elecciones generales del 29 de noviembre · Demócrata

The general strike convened for this Wednesday 11 November has opened a debate about its possible economic consequences. Various business organizations have warned about the impact that the disruption of activity may have on companies and on the economy as a whole.

Conpymes has put forward two scenarios to estimate the effect of the strike. With a level of impact of 30%, it calculates that the economic activity harmed would amount to €1.850 billion, equivalent to 0.11% of GDP. If the follow-through reached 70%, the figure would rise to €4.560 billion, 0.27% of gross domestic product.

The organization argues that small businesses and self-employed workers will be especially vulnerable to disruptions in activity, as they have less capacity to absorb its consequences. Its president, José María Torres, has also questioned whether union mobilization can resolve problems such as access to housing.

For its part, the Club of Spanish Exporters and Investors estimates that a widely followed strike could affect €1.600 billion in exportable production. Its president, Antonio Bonet, also warned that the call may convey an image of uncertainty to international investors.

CEOE and CEPYME warn of harm to companies

CEOE and CEPYME rejected the call in a joint statement published on 6 October. Both organizations considered that demands related to housing correspond to public administrations and criticized that the cost of the protest is passed on to companies and to economic activity.

The president of CEOE, Antonio Garamendi, said that businesspeople will be the "payers or those harmed" by a strike which, in his view, is directed against a problem that is not the responsibility of companies. The employers' organization has not backed these statements with its own economic forecast about the impact of the day.

The president of CEPYME, Ángela de Miguel, has also warned that the stoppage will especially harm small and medium-sized companies and self-employed workers, who have less leeway to cope with a disruption to their activity. She has also not specified a figure for the possible economic consequences.

Unions argue that companies can raise wages

The general secretaries of CCOO and UGT have defended salary demands linked to the call and have questioned the business arguments about the lack of capacity to assume pay increases.

In an interview published on November 8, Unai Sordo stated that business margins allow for improving wages and defended general increases of around 4%, which could reach 7% in agreements with lower-remuneration.

Pepe Álvarez also questioned the position of companies and pointed out that business margins could exceed 18%. The general secretary of UGT had placed days earlier the employers’ association as the main recipient of the call, due to its position in the negotiation of the trade union demands.