What has been the strongest earthquake in Spain? The 10 largest, from greatest to least

Spain has suffered earthquakes capable of destroying cities, causing tsunamis, and leaving hundreds dead. These are ten of the largest seismic episodes documented by the National Geographic Institute, ordered by their magnitude. Four had their epicenter in Granada, including the largest tremor recorded instrumentally under Spanish territory.

5 minutes

EuropaPress 7719637 imagenes destrozos causado terremoto 18 agosto 2026 granada andalucia

EuropaPress 7719637 imagenes destrozos causado terremoto 18 agosto 2026 granada andalucia

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

5 minutes

Most read

The succession of earthquakes recorded in Granada has returned a disturbing question: what has been the strongest earthquake in the history of Spain? The answer depends on the criterion used, because the earthquake of greatest magnitude does not necessarily coincide with the deadliest or most destructive.

The largest known earthquake that has affected Spain was the one that occurred on November 1, 1755, southwest of Cape San Vicente, with an estimated magnitude of 8.5. However, its epicenter was located in the Atlantic Ocean, outside the current Spanish territory. History shows that magnitude does not explain everything. Depth, distance from populated areas, soil type, and building resilience can make a moderate earthquake more destructive than another considerably larger.

Cape San Vicente, 1755: magnitude 8.5

The earthquake of November 1, 1755, commonly known as the Lisbon earthquake, reached an estimated magnitude of 8.5 and a maximum intensity of X.

Its epicenter was in the Atlantic, southwest of Cape San Vicente, but its consequences arrived with enormous violence in Spain. The shaking caused damage in numerous localities and generated a catastrophic tsunami that particularly affected the Gulf of Cádiz.

The IGN catalog records waves of up to 13 meters and observations from the Caribbean to the United Kingdom. It was the largest known earthquake that has affected Spain, although it cannot be strictly considered an earthquake with an epicenter within national territory.

Dúrcal, Granada, 1954: magnitude 7.8

On March 29, 1954, a magnitude 7.8 earthquake was recorded south of Granada. It is the largest shaking measured instrumentally with an epicenter located under Spanish territory.

Its focus, however, was at a depth of more than 600 kilometers. This circumstance dampened its effects on the surface and explains why it only reached an intensity of V, much lower than that of other historical earthquakes of lesser magnitude.

Queralbs, Girona, 1428: estimated magnitude 7.3

On February 2, 1428, an earthquake of estimated magnitude 7.3 shook the Catalan Pyrenees. Its epicenter was located near Queralbs, in Girona, and reached an intensity of between IX and X.

The IGN estimates about 800 victims and notes that Queralbs was destroyed. It was the culminating episode of a seismic crisis that began in 1427 and continues to be one of the largest known surface earthquakes with an epicenter in Spain.

Vega de Granada, 1431: estimated magnitude 6.7

On April 24, 1431, an earthquake of estimated magnitude 6.7 shook southern Granada. The quake reached an intensity of between VIII and IX and caused severe damage to the Alhambra, in addition to affecting other buildings in the city and its surroundings.

The earthquake occurred during the Nasrid reign and constitutes one of the main historical references regarding the destructive capacity of earthquakes in the Vega de Granada.

Torrevieja, Alicante, 1829: estimated magnitude 6.6

On March 21, 1829, an earthquake of estimated magnitude 6.6 destroyed Torrevieja and Guardamar del Segura. It reached an intensity of between IX and X and caused around 400 deaths.

The IGN considers it one of the largest and most violent historical earthquakes recorded on the Peninsula. The subsequent reconstruction even influenced the urban design of Torrevieja, with wider streets and shorter buildings.

Arenas del Rey, Granada, 1884: estimated magnitude 6.5

On the night of December 25, 1884, an earthquake of estimated magnitude 6.5 devastated numerous populations in Granada and Málaga. Its epicenter was located near Arenas del Rey and reached an intensity of between IX and X.

Known as the earthquake of Andalucía, it caused around 840 deaths and destroyed or severely damaged thousands of buildings. It was one of the largest natural disasters in contemporary Spain.

Almería, 1522: estimated magnitude around 6.5

The earthquake that occurred on September 22, 1522 was one of the deadliest documented in Spain. The IGN places its origin in the area of Alhama de Almería and estimates that it caused approximately 1,000 deaths.

The city of Almería and other nearby towns suffered enormous destruction. The historical catalog of the IGN also records a disturbance of the sea associated with the earthquake, although its degree of reliability is limited.

Baza, Granada, 1531: estimated magnitude between 6.2 and 6.5

The Baza basin trembled violently again in 1531. According to the National Geographic Institute, the earthquake caused about 400 casualties and destroyed more than 60% of the city's homes.

It is considered one of the major cortical earthquakes recorded in the central area of the Betic mountain ranges. Its magnitude falls within the range of the major historical earthquakes of the region, although there is no direct instrumental measurement.

Alhaurín el Grande, Málaga, 1680: intensity VIII-IX

The October 9, 1680, a great earthquake located in the surroundings of Alhaurín el Grande caused significant damage in Málaga and in numerous Andalusian towns.

The episode reached an estimated intensity of between VIII and IX. There are also historical references to a disturbance of the sea off Málaga, although the IGN's own catalog considers the possibility of a tsunami to be disputed.

The absence of a sufficiently consolidated magnitude estimate prevents it from being precisely placed against other historical episodes.

Lorca, Murcia, 2011: magnitude 5.1

On May 11, 2011, an earthquake of magnitude 5.1 and barely four kilometers deep shook Lorca. Nine people died and numerous buildings suffered damage.

Its magnitude was much lower than that of the great historical earthquakes, but the epicenter was located about five kilometers from the city. The shallow depth, proximity to homes, and the vulnerability of some constructions multiplied its destructive capacity.

Lorca thus left one of the main lessons of seismology: an earthquake does not need to reach an extraordinary magnitude to cause a catastrophe.

So, what has been the strongest earthquake in Spain?

The strongest earthquake that has affected Spain was the one off Cape San Vicente in 1755, with an estimated magnitude of 8.5, although its epicenter was in the Atlantic. The largest instrumentally recorded under Spanish territory was the one in Dúrcal in 1954, with a magnitude of 7.8, but its enormous depth considerably reduced the damage.

Among the most destructive shallow earthquakes are those of Queralbs, Almería, Torrevieja, and Arenas del Rey. The latter also confirms the historical prominence of Granada, the province that concentrates four of the ten episodes included in this selection.

The case of Lorca provides the most recent lesson: magnitude is only part of the story. Depth, proximity to a city, and the resilience of buildings can be much more decisive when the ground begins to shake.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What procedures are required for a natural disaster such as an earthquake to be declared a catastrophic zone in Spain, and what aid is provided under current legislation?

In Spain, the former “catastrophic zone” is now technically called a “zone seriously affected by a civil protection emergency”, a figure generally regulated in the Law 17/2015, of July 9, on the National Civil Protection System (BOE-A-2015-7730). Based on this, aid packages are articulated on a case-by-case basis through royal decree-laws (for example, RDL 11/2019, on storms and other catastrophes, BOE-A-2019-13409, or RDL 2/2019, BOE-A-2019-960).

1. Procedures for the declaration of a seriously affected zone

Law 17/2015 (chapter V) establishes the basic procedure so that, after a catastrophe such as an earthquake, this situation is declared:

  • Initiative from the territory. The first to assess the extent of the damage are the municipalities and the autonomous community. They gather information on personal injuries, material damage, disruption of daily life, impact on essential services, etc.
  • Request for declaration. The interested public administrations (usually the autonomous community and/or the affected municipalities, often through the Government Delegation/Subdelegation) can formally request the State to declare the “zone seriously affected by a civil protection emergency.”
  • Preliminary reports. Before deciding, the Government may request a report from the affected autonomous community or communities on:
    • The existence of significant personal or material damage.
    • Whether the disaster seriously disrupts the living conditions of the population in a given area.
    • Whether there has been a total or partial paralysis of essential public services (water, electricity, transport, communications, etc.).
  • Technical and political proposal. Based on this data, the Ministries of Interior and Finance —and others involved (Transport, Agriculture, Labor, etc.)— prepare a proposal for declaration and measures.
  • Agreement of the Council of Ministers. The declaration is made by Agreement of the Council of Ministers, which:
    • Designates the area as a “zone seriously affected by a civil protection emergency”.
    • Defines the territorial scope (municipalities, provinces, islands, regions, etc.).
    It is usually published by ministerial order incorporating the agreement into the BOE (for example, Order PJC/1222/2024 on a DANA: BOE-A-2024-23055).
  • Deployment of aid. After the declaration, the agreement itself and, if applicable, a royal decree-law on general aid specify the measures and their financing, which are then developed by sectoral ministerial orders (labor, social security, agriculture, etc.).

2. Aid and benefits provided under current legislation

Law 17/2015 establishes a general catalogue of measures (articles 23 and 24), which are then specified and expanded in royal decree-laws such as those from 2019. Among them are:

  • Aid to individuals
    • Main residence and essential belongings: subsidies to repair or replace damaged homes and furniture.
    • Personal damages: financial aid for death or absolute and permanent disability, channeled according to Royal Decree 307/2005, which regulates subsidies for emergencies and catastrophes.
  • Support to local corporations
    • Compensation for unavoidable expenses incurred by municipalities and provincial councils in initial emergency actions.
    • Subsidies for damages to municipal infrastructure, provincial or island road networks, and other public assets.
  • Businesses and self-employed
    • Aid to industrial, commercial, tourist, maritime-fishing, and service establishments, often complementary to compensation from the Insurance Compensation Consortium (for example, subsidies up to a percentage of the deductible).
    • Unemployment benefits and labor measures specific to affected zones (temporary contract suspensions, worker protection, etc.), developed by orders such as Order TES/443/2022 (BOE-A-2022-8246).
  • Agricultural and fishing sector
    • Subsidies for damages to agricultural, livestock, forestry, and marine aquaculture production, both for production losses and for damage to non-insurable elements related to the operation.
    • These aids are articulated with the combined agricultural insurance system and European State aid regulations.
  • Tax measures
    • Exemption from Property Tax (IBI) for the year of the disaster for damaged homes, agricultural operations, and premises requiring relocation.
    • Reductions in the Economic Activities Tax (IAE) when the activity has been interrupted or severely affected.
    • Exemptions from traffic fees for deregistration of damaged vehicles or other related fees.
  • Financial measures
    • Opening of preferential loan lines and guarantees through the Official Credit Institute (ICO), to support the reconstruction of homes, businesses, and operations.
  • Social Security and employment
    • Moratoriums and exemptions from Social Security contributions under terms set by development orders.
    • Specific measures for workers and companies in temporary employment regulation files (ERTE) or other figures linked to the catastrophe.

In practice, after an earthquake, this general scheme would be followed: territorial administrations request the declaration; the Council of Ministers, based on reports, agrees and defines the area; and, based on Law 17/2015, a royal decree-law of aid is approved that activates this catalogue of measures adapted to the specific case.

Could you explain in more detail exactly what Law 17/2015 says about articles 23 and 24 and how they are applied in a practical earthquake case? What differences exist between state aid for catastrophic zones and those that an autonomous community or municipality can approve? What requirements and deadlines does a person affected by an earthquake usually have to apply for the different aids (housing, business, agriculture, etc.)?

What are the competencies of the National Geographic Institute regarding seismology and seismic emergency management?

The National Geographic Institute (IGN), dependent on the Ministry of Transport and Sustainable Mobility, is the official state seismological service. Its central role is in seismic monitoring and providing technical information to civil protection authorities, not in the operational management of emergencies.

In the field of seismology and seismic monitoring, its main competencies are:

  • Operating the National Seismic Network, responsible for recording and analyzing earthquakes occurring in Spanish territory and nearby areas. According to Demócrata, the IGN and its National Seismic Network are the official reference for determining the earthquake’s location, magnitude, depth, and other characteristics, continuously updating the catalog as new data arrives.
  • Detection, location, and calculation of seismic parameters. IGN technicians calculate the magnitude, epicenter, depth, and the intensity with which each movement has been felt. A recent analysis by Demócrata (“Earthquakes in Spain: Who does what in the event of a quake”) summarizes this function as the responsibility for “detection, location, and calculation of seismic parameters.”
  • Maintenance and reinforcement of instrumentation. In episodes like the Granada seismic series, the IGN maintains very dense networks of permanent sensors and even deploys portable seismic stations to improve the location and characterization of movements, as detailed in the photographic report on the Granada earthquakes in Demócrata.
  • Management of the official earthquake catalog. The IGN maintains an almost real-time updated catalog of seismic events, as well as cartographic viewers that allow visualization of epicenters and basic parameters of each event. The press describes these viewers as the tool that allows citizens to check the latest earthquakes and their technical data.
  • Scientific support and planning. The IGN has prepared the National Plan for Seismic, Volcanological, and Other Geophysical Phenomena Monitoring for 2025-2028, approved by the Council of Ministers. This plan strengthens monitoring networks, incorporates technologies such as artificial intelligence to improve early warnings, and promotes inter-institutional coordination in the face of earthquakes, eruptions, tsunamis, and other geophysical phenomena, according to the note from the Ministry of Transport itself (official news).

In the field of seismic emergency management, the IGN’s competencies are technical support, not command:

  • Demócrata emphasizes that the IGN “does not direct the emergency”, but provides an “indispensable element for managing it”: the seismic data. Its records allow knowing whether it is an isolated earthquake, aftershocks, or an ongoing sequence, which helps civil protection authorities adjust emergency phases, deployments, and recommendations to the population.
  • In the competency scheme described by Demócrata, the State, through the IGN and other state means, assumes seismic monitoring, national coordination, and extraordinary support, while emergency management falls to the autonomous communities or, in cases of national interest, the Ministry of the Interior. That is, the IGN informs and advises; decisions on evacuation, closures, or plan activation correspond to autonomous or state civil protection.
  • The IGN provides its data and analyses to emergency coordination centers (112, civil protection, CECOP/CECOPI) and participates in risk assessment, especially when there are prolonged sequences or activity near population centers, as shown in reports on recent Granada earthquakes.
  • Besides earthquakes, the IGN’s National Seismic Network is part of the National Tsunami Warning System, according to the Basic Civil Protection Planning Guideline for Tsunami Risk (Royal Decree 1053/2015). In an agreement published in the BOE with the SOCIB system of the Balearic Islands (BOE-A-2025-22841), it is recalled that the National Seismic Network is the body that detects, assesses, and informs initially about phenomena that may generate tsunamis, integrating its data into alert systems for institutions.

In summary, the IGN has a key technical and scientific role: it monitors seismic activity, precisely characterizes each earthquake, maintains the catalog and observation networks, coordinates planning and technological improvement, and supplies essential information to civil protection officials. But it does not have executive command powers in the emergency: it neither declares phases, orders evacuations, nor directs operations. Its function is to provide the objective basis on which other authorities make decisions.

What technical and regulatory requirements are currently demanded in Spain’s building regulations to guarantee the seismic resistance of buildings?

In Spain, the seismic resistance of buildings is guaranteed through a set of basic state regulations that are mandatory throughout the territory, complemented where applicable by autonomous and municipal requirements. The current regulatory core is based on the Technical Building Code (CTE), approved by Royal Decree 314/2006, of March 17 (BOE-A-2006-5515), the Seismic Resistant Construction Standard: general part and building (NCSE-02), approved by Royal Decree 997/2002, of September 27 (BOE-A-2002-19687), and the Structural Code, approved by Royal Decree 470/2021, of June 29 (BOE-A-2021-13681), which develops design and execution criteria for structures, including article 47 “Design of concrete structures against earthquakes”.

Within the scope of the CTE, seismic requirements are mainly articulated through the Basic Document DB-SE (Structural Safety) and the DB-SE-AE (Actions in building), which refer to specific seismic resistant regulations for defining seismic design action and verification methods. For buildings used for residential, administrative, and educational purposes, generally applicable to new construction and significant interventions on existing structures, the essential requirements can be grouped into the following blocks.

1. Definition of seismic design action
  • Seismic zoning: NCSE-02 establishes a hazard map and basic seismic acceleration coefficients, assigned according to the building’s location. High seismicity zones (e.g., areas in the southeastern peninsula or certain islands) have higher acceleration values and therefore greater structural demands.
  • Building importance and use: importance categories are defined based on use (ordinary housing, educational buildings, buildings housing essential services, etc.), with coefficients that increase the seismic design action for the most critical uses.
  • Seismic action model: reference elastic response spectra are adopted and, depending on the structural system and expected ductility level, behavior factors are applied allowing design under controlled inelastic regime.
2. Calculation criteria and structural analysis
  • Analysis methods: for most low- and mid-rise buildings, equivalent static analysis is accepted; for more complex or irregular structures, the regulatory framework requires modal spectral dynamic analysis.
  • Limitation of displacements and drifts: the regulation sets maximum inter-story drifts to avoid excessive damage both in structural and non-structural elements (partitions, facades, installations).
  • Verification of load-bearing capacity: the Structural Code establishes verification formats (usually ultimate and service limit states) that concrete, steel, or mixed sections and joints must meet under seismic action combinations.
3. Ductility and structural configuration
  • Global and local ductility: the resistant system (frames, walls, concrete cores, etc.) must have sufficient hysteretic capacity, concentrating plasticization in controlled zones (e.g., plastic hinges at beam ends) and avoiding brittle mechanisms.
  • Resistance hierarchy: design must respect “strong column–weak beam” or “strong wall–weak slab” criteria, so that collapse occurs, if any, in a ductile manner and with warning, not by abrupt compression or punching failures.
  • Seismic reinforcement details: the Structural Code includes specific requirements for minimum reinforcement ratios, node confinement, closed stirrups, and anchorage lengths for reinforced concrete elements, stricter in high seismicity zones.
  • Regularity in plan and elevation: a regular configuration is encouraged, with sufficiently rigid floor diaphragms, adequate spacing between buildings (seismic joints), and soft stories, abrupt setbacks, or sharp stiffness changes are discouraged.
4. Non-structural elements and quality control
  • Non-structural elements: it is required to verify that facades, partitions, false ceilings, chimneys, and heavy equipment are properly anchored or braced to prevent detachment during a quake, as their collapse is a common source of casualties and damage.
  • Material and execution control: the Structural Code sets documentary and construction controls (concrete strength, steel characteristics, welds, bolted joints, prefabricated elements, etc.) that must be enhanced in structures subject to seismic requirements.
  • Inspection and maintenance: for existing buildings or strengthening interventions, structural evaluation programs and maintenance plans considering seismic behavior throughout the service life are contemplated.

On this state basis, some autonomous communities and municipal ordinances introduce additional requirements in high hazard zones (e.g., strict application of high ductility prescriptions, or reinforced criteria for hospitals, schools, or strategic buildings). Although progressive adaptation to the structural Eurocodes framework is underway, in current professional practice the combination of CTE, NCSE-02, and Structural Code constitutes the main reference to guarantee seismic resistance of buildings in Spain.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What has been the largest magnitude earthquake to affect Spain?

Question 1 of 3

What characteristic of the Dúrcal, Granada earthquake in 1954 attenuated its surface effects?

Question 2 of 3

What lesson did the 2011 Lorca earthquake provide about the danger of earthquakes?

Question 3 of 3

Hola, soy Fren. ¿Cómo te ayudo?