Be careful when opening a bank account for your children: the money you deposit for them may be considered a donation.

The General Directorate of Taxes and experts in taxation reveal the keys to understand if the money in your children's account is a donation or a legitimate family savings.

EuropaPress 6931480 billetes monedas septiembre 2025 madrid espana uso dinero efectivo sigue

EuropaPress 6931480 billetes monedas septiembre 2025 madrid espana uso dinero efectivo sigue

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

9 minutes

Most read

España vota · Congreso y Senado

Elecciones generales 29 de noviembre de 2026

Se eligen 350 diputados y los senadores de elección directa. Encuestas, calendario, candidaturas, programas y todo lo que necesitas saber para votar.

Faltan 43 días y 17 horas para que abran los colegios electorales.Hasta que abran los colegios, el domingo 29 a las 09:00 (hora peninsular).
Entra en el especial

Próximas fechas

  1. HoyÚltimo día para comunicar coaliciones electoralesFecha prevista
  2. Presentación de candidaturas al Congreso y al Senado21–26 oct · Fecha prevista
  3. Voto desde el extranjero (CERA): envío de la documentación24–30 oct · Fecha prevista
  4. Publicación de las candidaturas presentadasFecha prevista
Calendario completo

Opening a bank account in the name of a child and starting to deposit money so that they can accumulate some savings can have a tax consequence that is not always taken into account: if those funds become theirs, the operation can be considered a donation. It does not matter if the goal is to help them in the future with a home, pay for a car, or simply save money for when they are older. The key is to know who is the owner of the funds and if a free transfer has occurred.

The situation changes when parents do not give the money to the child, but simply incorporate them as co-holder of an account that still economically belongs to those who contributed the funds. In that case, being listed as an account holder at the bank does not necessarily mean having become the owner of a part of the balance.

The difference is explained to Demócrata by César García Novoa, professor of Financial and Tax Law at the University of Santiago de Compostela, based on the criteria established by the General Directorate of Taxes in its consultation V0640-25, of April 8, 2025. Mere co-ownership, he points out, does not in itself imply a donation.

Daniel Tallón, CMO and Marketing Director of TaxDown, reaches the same conclusion from a practical standpoint. "The Treasury does not prohibit anything, it simply qualifies the operation," he explains to Demócrata. To determine if there is a donation, three situations that may seem similar from the bank's perspective must be distinguished, but which are not fiscally: whether the child is the owner of the account, whether they are listed as a co-holder, or whether they are only authorized to operate with it.

Putting your child as a co-holder does not mean giving them half of the money

The consultation V0640-25 precisely addresses this issue.

Taxes analyzes what happens when parents incorporate their daughter as a holder of their bank accounts and concludes that this change does not necessarily imply a donation.

García Novoa explains to Demócrata the basis of that criterion. A bank account constitutes a deposit contract and the legal relationship is established between the depositor, owner of the deposited funds, and the entity that receives the funds. The appearance of several holders does not automatically modify who the true owner of the money is.

Co-ownership determines, in principle, who can dispose of the balance in front of the bank, but does not allow concluding that this money belongs to all holders equally.

It is a substantial difference.

If some parents have 40,000 euros from their savings and add their child as a co-holder, that simple change does not mean that they have donated 20,000 euros. The money can continue to belong entirely to those who contributed it.

The General Directorate of Taxes follows in this matter the criterion established by the Supreme Court: the power of disposition derived from a joint account does not determine by itself the ownership of the funds.

Another thing is to open an account in the child's name and put the money there

The situation is different if the parents open an account in the child's name and deposit money with the intention that it becomes theirs.

"The money that the parents deposit enters the child's estate, so yes: it is a donation subject to the Inheritance and Donations Tax", explains Tallón to Demócrata.

García Novoa makes the same distinction. One thing is to incorporate someone as a co-holder of funds that still belong to the one who contributed them and another to part with the money to incorporate it freely into the child's estate.

It is in that patrimonial displacement where the donation appears.

The Law on Inheritance and Donations Tax establishes as a taxable event the acquisition of goods and rights through a donation or any other free legal transaction between living persons. Therefore, what is decisive is not only whose name appears on the account, but whether the child has actually acquired that money without giving anything in return. 

The amount does not determine whether or not there is a donation

This point has another important consequence.

There is no general minimum in state legislation below which a free transfer of money automatically ceases to be a donation, explains García Novoa.

The nature of the operation does not depend on whether the parents give 500, 5,000, or 50,000 euros. If there is a free transfer that increases the child's estate, the taxable event of the Inheritance and Donations Tax may occur.

This also helps to understand what happens with family gifts.

García Novoa recalls that, with the law in hand, even certain money transfers made as wedding gifts can be considered a donation. Another issue is the practical action of tax administrations and that the checks focus on operations of greater economic relevance.

That a small cash delivery is not investigated does not mean that there is a general state exemption that leaves it out of the tax.

If the child uses the money for themselves, the situation may change

Co-ownership does not indefinitely protect any movement of funds.

A child can appear as a co-owner of an account whose money belongs entirely to their parents without there being a donation. But the situation changes if they subsequently appropriates part of that balance for their own benefit without cost.

Tallón precisely places the relevant moment there: "The donation appears at the moment when the co-owner who contributed nothing disposes of that money for their own benefit."

Let’s think of parents who add their child as a co-owner of an account with 50,000 euros. If the funds still belong to the parents, co-ownership does not automatically make the child an owner.

But if later they take 25,000 euros with the consent of their parents to pay the down payment on their own home and these give it to them for free, that operation will need to be analyzed as a property transfer.

The focus then shifts from who can move the money to who ends up keeping it.

And there is a third figure: the authorized

The simplest alternative when parents want to allow a child to operate with their money without transferring ownership is to make them authorized.

"The authorized person does not own anything: they sign on behalf of the owner. There is no property transfer and therefore there is no donation or ISD", explains Tallón.

The authorization allows certain operations to be carried out, but does not attribute ownership of the balance to the authorized person.

There is also a boundary here. If they use the money for themselves because the parents decide to give it to them for free, the existence of a donation will need to be analyzed. The bank authorization does not change the nature of the transfer that may occur later.

It also does not make the authorized person the owner when the owner passes away. If the balance belonged to the deceased, it will be part of their hereditary estate and its transfer will be subject to the corresponding rules of the Inheritance Tax.

It is not usually the Tax Agency that inspects these donations

When talking about these operations, it is common to generically use the term "Hacienda," but there is an important precision.

The checks of the Inheritance and Donations Tax correspond generally to the tax administrations of the autonomous communities, not to the State Agency for Tax Administration.

The tax is state-level, but it is ceded to the autonomous communities of the common regime. Law 22/2009 delegates its application to them and, within the ceded competencies, the functions of management, collection, and inspection. (BOE)

Therefore, if a family residing in Madrid makes a donation subject to Madrid regulations, it will be the tax administration of the Community of Madrid that is competent for its management and eventual verification, not the AEAT.

There are specific cases in which the competence remains with the State, but they do not constitute the ordinary case of a donation between parents and children residing subject to an autonomous community.

In Madrid, donations from parents to children are discounted by 99%

That a money transfer is a donation does not necessarily mean that it is accompanied by a high tax invoice.

The Inheritance and Donations Tax presents very important differences between autonomous communities because these have regulatory competencies over the tax.

Madrid is one of the clearest examples. Donations between parents and children have a 99% discount on the fee, so that, when the established requirements are met, only 1% of the resulting fee must be paid. 

The discount does not mean that the operation ceases to be a donation. It means that, once the tax is calculated, the autonomous regulations practically reduce the entire amount that would correspond to be paid.

Since July 2025, Madrid also applies a 100% discount for certain donations of up to 1,000 euros, regardless of the relationship, and has relaxed the formalities for some donations of up to 10,000 euros. 

For donations between parents and children formalized in a public document, the Community maintains the 99% discount. When money is given, it requires that the source of the funds be duly justified. 

Therefore, two statements can coexist: a money transfer can legally constitute a donation and, at the same time, have a very low tax cost due to the discounts of the corresponding autonomous community.

The problem may arise when the money is used years later

Tallón points to Democrat where the main practical risk is usually found.

"Tax authorities almost never look at the opening of the account, they look at the outflow of money," he points out.

The money can remain in an account for years without any verification taking place. The issue may arise later when those funds appear linked to a larger transaction.

A house is the most obvious example. It can also happen with a car or an investment.

"The problem arises when that amount reappears in the purchase of a house, a car, or an investment and there is no declared donation behind it," explains the CMO of TaxDown.

At that moment, the regional tax administration may ask the taxpayer to prove the origin of the funds. If they come from their parents, it will be necessary to determine what the legal relationship was that allowed the child to dispose of them.

It could be money that already belonged to them, a family loan that can be proven as such, or a gift. In the latter case, the transaction may be considered a donation.

The origin of the money is decisive

The tax inquiry leads precisely to this issue.

Bank ownership may be an indication, but it does not resolve by itself who owns the balance. If there is a verification, it will be necessary to prove where the money came from and what really happened to it.

This explains why an account with several holders does not necessarily imply that they all own the same percentage.

It also helps to understand the opposite assumption: a person may not have contributed a single euro to an account and later end up receiving part of its funds. If that transfer is free, the prior existence of co-ownership does not prevent a donation from occurring.

The law itself establishes a presumption of lucrative transmission when the data from the Administration shows a decrease in a person's assets and, within the statute of limitations, a corresponding increase in certain relatives, including descendants.

Four years to verify

Tallón recalls that the general statute of limitations for tax matters is four years, the calculation of which must be determined based on the moment when the corresponding declaration period ended.

This means that a money transfer does not stop having consequences simply because the regional tax administration does not detect it when it is made.

Bank traceability can become relevant some time later. A transfer from the parents, the subsequent purchase of a home, or the payment for a vehicle can allow for the reconstruction of the origin of the funds if a verification is initiated.

That is why Tallón insists on the documentation of the operations: "It is not illegal, it is a poorly documented donation. Done correctly, in most cases the tax cost is almost zero."

Account holder, co-holder, or authorized: three distinct situations

The two sources consulted by Demócrata agree that the name that appears on the account is not enough to determine the tax consequences.

If the parents open an account in the child's name and deposit money for it to become theirs, there may be a donation.

If they include the child as co-holder on an account whose funds still belong to the parents, there is not necessarily any transfer. Being able to dispose of the balance in front of the bank does not equate to being its owner.

And if the child appears only as authorized, they can operate with the money within the granted powers, but they do not acquire ownership by that alone.

The difference appears when the money actually changes ownership.

That is the criterion that García Novoa extracts from consultation V0640-25 and that Tallón translates to the everyday functioning of these accounts. It is not the opening of the account that solely determines that there is a donation. It is what the parents do with the money and who ends up being its owner.

 

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

What are the procedures and deadlines for declaring a money donation to a child before the regional tax administration?

In Spain, money donations from parents to children are subject to the Inheritance and Donations Tax (ISD), whose management and much of the practical regulation correspond to the autonomous communities. This means that the specific form, the submission channel, and the exact deadlines may vary, but the procedure scheme is usually very similar throughout the territory.

1. Formalization of the donation
  • Donation agreement: legally, an agreement between donor and donee is sufficient, but in practice it is highly recommended to document it in writing.
  • Notarial public deed (highly advisable):
    • The notary records who donates, who receives, the amount, the payment method, and the date.
    • The deed serves as the main document for the tax self-assessment and may be necessary if the Tax Agency reviews the operation in the future.
  • Proof of money movement: usually a bank transfer receipt, nominative check, or equivalent document is provided.
2. Identification of the competent administration
  • In donations from parents to children, the competence usually corresponds to the autonomous community of habitual residence of the child (donee) at the time of the donation.
  • The regional Tax Agency's website indicates:
    • Which self-assessment form is used for donations.
    • The specific instructions and possible reductions for parents–children.
    • The submission methods (online, in person, or both).
3. Documentation usually required

With variations between communities, it is common to require:

  • ID/NIE of donor and donee.
  • Family book or other document proving kinship (to apply reductions or bonuses for being a child).
  • Donation deed or, failing that, a private document signed by both parties.
  • Proof of payment or transfer of the donated money.
  • Form/self-assessment of the Inheritance and Donations Tax correctly completed.
  • In some cases, prior appointment or electronic registration if submitted in person/online.
4. Submission and self-assessment

In most communities, management is by self-assessment by the taxpayer:

  • The regional Tax Agency provides a specific form for donations (online form or PDF).
  • It must indicate:
    • Data of donor and donee.
    • Amount donated and date of donation.
    • Payment method (transfer, check, etc.).
    • Reductions, bonuses, or applicable rates according to regional regulations.
  • After completing the form:
    • If the result is payable, the payment is made (usually by electronic banking, card, or direct debit).
    • Scanned documentation is attached if the submission is electronic, or in paper if in person.
5. Usual deadlines

Although the specific regulation is regional, the ISD for donations is usually subject to a relatively short submission deadline from when the donation is perfected (that is, from when the money is delivered). This deadline is generally counted from the day after the donation and is measured in weeks or a few months, not years.

Therefore, it is prudent to:

  • Consider the deadline as short and not delay the procedure.
  • Explicitly check on the regional Tax Agency's website:
    • The exact number of days and whether they are business or calendar days.
    • The consequences of late submission (surcharges, interest, possible penalties).
6. Consequences of not declaring or declaring late
  • If the self-assessment is not submitted, the regional Tax Agency may carry out an official assessment, demanding the tax plus surcharges and penalties.
  • If submitted late, surcharges and interest usually apply, although the penalty may be lower if the taxpayer voluntarily regularizes.
  • Not declaring can cause problems if in the future:
    • The Tax Agency verifies the child's assets (for example, home purchase) and requests justification of the source of funds.
    • Inheritances among siblings are disputed and previous donations are reviewed.
7. Practical recommendation

Since each community sets its own form, reductions, and deadline details, the safest is to:

  • Consult the official website of the regional Tax Agency of the child's residence.
  • For large amounts or complex situations, consider consulting a tax advisor or processing the donation through a notary, who usually offers guidance on the tax and its deadlines.
How does the taxation of money donations to a child change according to the autonomous community where they reside? What practical differences are there between donating money to a child during life and leaving that same amount as inheritance? What exact documentation does my autonomous community require to process the donation tax between parents and children?

What powers do the regional tax administrations have regarding the Inheritance and Donations Tax?

The Inheritance and Donations Tax (ISD) is a state tax whose ownership corresponds to the State (art. 133 CE), but it is almost entirely delegated to the autonomous communities in collection and largely in regulatory capacity. This delegation is structured through the LOFCA and the law on the delegation of State taxes to the autonomous communities.

1. General framework of the delegation

The State retains the basic regulation of the tax (definition of the taxable event, taxpayer, tax base, general structure of the rate, basic concepts of reductions, etc.), but delegates the revenue and broad regulatory and management powers to the common regime autonomous communities. That is:

  • The ISD remains a state tax.
  • The revenue generated, in practice, is entered into the autonomous community coffers.
  • The communities can largely configure the effective tax burden in their territory.

2. Regulatory powers of the autonomous communities

The regional tax administrations have leeway to regulate essential aspects of the final amount of the tax, always within the limits set by state regulations:

  • Reductions in the tax base: they can improve or expand the reductions provided in the state law, especially in acquisitions by children, spouses, and ascendants, family businesses, main residence, agricultural holdings, etc.
  • Rates and tax rates: they can approve their own scale of rates, usually progressive, which allows them to toughen or soften the tax compared to the state minimum.
  • Multiplying coefficients and quota bonuses: they can modulate the tax through coefficients based on pre-existing assets or degrees of kinship, and introduce very high bonuses (in some cases close to 99% for certain relatives).
  • Improvement of minimums and benefits for certain groups: for example, greater reductions for disabled persons or for certain productive economy figures.
  • Basic formal and procedural aspects: they can influence complementary formal obligations, without altering the essential structure of the tax set by state law.

This capacity explains the very significant differences in taxation between communities: the same inheritance or donation can have a very different tax burden depending on the competent territory.

3. Powers of management, assessment, collection, and inspection

In addition to partial regulatory capacity, the regional tax administrations generally assume the comprehensive management of the tax when, according to the connection rules, the community is competent. This includes:

  • Management and assessment: receipt and processing of declarations or self-assessments, value verification, issuance of provisional and definitive assessments, and response to taxpayer inquiries.
  • Collection: acceptance of payments, granting of deferrals or installments, management of surcharges and enforcement proceedings.
  • Inspection: verification of correct compliance with obligations, investigation of undeclared assets or rights, and proposal of sanctions in case of infringement.
  • Administrative review: resolution of appeals and economic-administrative claims within their competence, according to the state review system.

4. Limits and coordination with the State

The regional powers are subject to constitutional and legal limits:

  • They must respect the basic state regulation. They cannot alter the taxable event or the essential structural elements of the tax.
  • They cannot violate principles such as equality and market unity. Constitutional jurisprudence has controlled measures that generated unjustified discrimination between residents and non-residents or between residents in different communities.
  • The delegation does not imply loss of the State's original taxing power: the state legislator can modify both the tax law and the delegation framework and, thereby, limit or expand the regional margin.
  • Coordination is structured, among other channels, through the Fiscal and Financial Policy Council, where possible harmonization measures are addressed and the impact of regional regulatory diversity is supervised.

In summary, the regional tax administrations have a very relevant position in the Inheritance and Donations Tax: they manage the tax, keep its revenue, and can intensely modulate the effective taxation, but always within a state framework that sets the essential elements and can intervene to correct imbalances or excessive distortions between territories.

What legal requirements must be met for a money donation between parents and children to be exempt from the Inheritance and Donations Tax?

For a money donation between parents and children to be exempt or very lightly taxed by the Inheritance and Donations Tax (ISD) in Spain, general state requirements must be met and, above all, the specific requirements of the autonomous community where the operation is taxed. Below is a summary of the common elements usually required in most territories, with a practical approach.

1. Basic state legal framework

The ISD is regulated at the state level by the Law 29/1987, of December 18, on the Inheritance and Donations Tax, and by its Regulation, approved by Royal Decree 1629/1991, of November 8. These rules:

  • Define the “inter vivos” donation as the taxable event (art. 3 of the Law): gratuitous transfer of goods or rights between individuals.
  • Establish who is the taxpayer: the donee (the child receiving the money).
  • Determine the tax base (net value of the donated money) and the obligation to file a self-assessment (state forms 651, etc., or other regional forms).
  • Configure the system of reductions according to kinship (groups I and II: descendants, adopted, ascendants, spouse), on which the autonomous communities can improve the benefits.

Law 29/1987 itself (art. 20) refers to the reductions approved by each autonomous community, so the true exemption or near exemption derives from the regional tax regulations of delegated taxes (for example, Law 5/2021 of Andalusia, Legislative Decree 1/2010 of Madrid, Law 19/2010 and subsequent regulations in Catalonia, Law 13/1997 and its reforms in the Valencian Community, etc.).

2. Minimum formal requirements

Although details may vary, there are a series of basic formal requirements that, if not met, usually cause the loss of benefits:

  • Public document or, at least, written document: many communities require that the money donation be formalized in a notarial public deed; others accept certain private documents, but the reinforced benefits (specific reductions for money) are usually linked to a notarial deed stating the amount, identity of donor and donee, and, if applicable, the destination of the money.
  • Bank payment method: it is very common to require proof of the money movement (transfer, nominative check, identified deposit, etc.) to prove the reality of the donation and its amount.
  • Submission deadline: the self-assessment of the donation must generally be submitted within a 30 business day deadline from the granting of the deed or the act of donation. Late submission may result in loss of reductions or penalties.

3. Most common material requirements

Communities with softer taxation on donations between parents and children (Andalusia, Madrid, Valencian Community, much of Catalonia, etc.) usually require combinations of these requirements:

  • Direct kinship: the donation must be made between ascendants and descendants (parents–children, grandparents–grandchildren) or assimilated (adoptive parents–adopted). Benefits normally apply to subjects of groups I and II of the state law (descendants, ascendants, and spouse).
  • Amount limits: some regulations establish very high reductions (or practically 99–100% quota bonuses) up to a certain money threshold per child or donor; above that threshold, the excess part is taxed.
  • Justified destination of the money: for the greatest tax advantages, it is usually required that the money be destined to specific and verifiable purposes, such as:
    • Acquisition or rehabilitation of the child's main residence.
    • Contribution to establish or acquire an individual business, professional activity, or shares in entities (family business).
    • In some cases, certain training or study expenses.
    Justification is made with purchase deeds, invoices, canceled loan contracts, etc., within the deadlines set by each community (for example, that the home purchase is made within 3, 6, or 12 months following the donation).
  • Maintenance of the asset or activity: if the reduction is linked to a family business or main residence, it is usually required to maintain ownership and, in the case of the business, the activity for a minimum period (typically 5 years). Selling earlier may imply regularization and repayment of the benefit.
  • Age and situation of the donee: some reductions are designed for young people (for example, under 35 years old) or for taxpayers with certain circumstances (disability, etc.), which conditions their application.
  • Tax residence: following Constitutional Court rulings, benefits cannot be required only for “habitual” residents in the community, but the regional regulations apply considering the ISD connection points (residence of the donee, location of assets, etc.).

4. Practical recommendation

In practice, achieving that the donation is exempt or almost exempt implies:

  • Identifying in which autonomous community the tax will be filed.
  • Checking if there are specific reductions for money donations between ascendants and descendants and what their conditions are (maximum amount, destination, deadlines).
  • Planning the operation with a notary and tax advisor before moving the money, to coordinate date, deed, and justification of the destination.

The regional casuistry is very broad and changing; therefore, before making the donation, it is advisable to review the specific regulations of the community where it will be taxed, to ensure that all requirements are met and possible exemptions or bonuses are not lost.

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

When is the deposit of money into an account in a child's name considered a taxable gift?

Question 1 of 3

What does the co-ownership of a child in their parents' bank account imply, according to the Directorate General of Taxes?

Question 2 of 3

Who is responsible for the management and verification of the Inheritance and Donations Tax?

Question 3 of 3