The Supreme Court ruling on the grandchildren's law confronts the parties in the midst of the electoral pre-campaign.

The decision of the Supreme Court to maintain the precautionary suspension that affects the vote of naturalized Spaniards opens a new confrontation between parties: the Government, Podemos, and Sumar denounce a restriction of fundamental rights, while PP and Vox support the judicial resolution and question the application of the norm.

5 minutes

EuropaPress 7763784 presidente pp alberto nunez feijoo salida sesion plenaria congreso

EuropaPress 7763784 presidente pp alberto nunez feijoo salida sesion plenaria congreso

Add DEMÓCRATA to Google

Ask FREN

Published

Last updated

5 minutes

Most read

The Supreme Court's decision to reject the Government's appeal and maintain the precautionary suspension linked to the so-called grandchildren's law continues to provoke opposing reactions among the main political parties, just over a month before the general elections on November 29. The controversy affects Spaniards residing abroad who acquired nationality under the democratic memory law and whose inclusion in the electoral roll is questioned for not proving that they are descendants of exiles.

The Government and the parties to its left believe that the measure restricts the voting rights of Spanish citizens, while PP and Vox defend the Supreme Court's intervention and argue that it must be ensured that the nationalizations comply with legal requirements. The resolution has also opened a debate on how to apply the suspension with the electoral calendar already underway.

The controversy revolves around the application of the eighth additional provision of the democratic memory law and the administrative instruction that developed its procedure.

The Government disagrees with the Supreme Court but guarantees that it will comply with the resolution

The Government spokesperson, Elma Saiz, has criticized the Supreme Court's decision and defended that in a democracy "the right to vote is guaranteed, not restricted."

During the press conference following the Council of Ministers, Saiz described the situation as "of extraordinary gravity" because it affects, in the Executive's opinion, a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution.

Despite her disagreement with the judicial criterion, the minister has assured that "the Government always complies with judicial resolutions" and explained that Moncloa continues to analyze the scope of the ruling.

The Executive has also not specified whether it will go to the Constitutional Court. Government sources believe that it could be the affected citizens themselves who have standing to appeal and acknowledge difficulties in applying the resolution before November 29.

In Moncloa, they also warn that some of the affected voters participated in previous electoral processes and consider it especially complex to modify their electoral situation now. The Government also accuses PP and Vox of fueling suspicions about the guarantees of the electoral system.

Feijóo defends the cleanliness of the electoral roll and announces monitors at all polling stations

For its part, the president of the Popular Party, Alberto Núñez Feijóo, has supported the position of the Supreme Court and has placed the controversy in the need to guarantee the legality of the electoral roll.

"There is no democratic cleanliness if there is no cleanliness of the roll", he stated in an interview on esRadio, in which he announced that the PP will deploy monitors and representatives at "all the polling places" on the next November 29.

Feijóo has rejected that his party opposes the recognition of the nationality of the descendants of exiles. As he explained, his disagreement centers on the administrative instruction that, in his opinion, expanded the assumptions provided for in the law.

The popular leader has accused the Executive of extending "indiscriminately" access to nationality and has defended the need to protect the legal value of the Spanish passport.

For the PP, the debate does not reside in preventing the vote of those who meet the legal requirements, but in verifying that the registration of the new Spanish citizens has been carried out in accordance with the regulations.

Vox celebrates the decision and announces that it will review nationalizations if it comes to power

The head of the Vox delegation in the European Parliament, Jorge Buxadé, has celebrated that the Supreme Court maintains the suspension and has announced that his party will review the nationalizations granted under the 'grandchildren's law' if it comes to power and has sufficient support.

In a television interview, Buxadé has maintained that there are doubts about the legality of the nationalizations processed through the administrative instruction of 2022, which is attributed to Sofía Puente.

The Vox leader has defended that only those who can document their status as descendants of Spanish exiles should be able to vote and has accused the Administration of having improperly expanded the scope of the law.

He has also announced that his party would demand criminal responsibilities from officials who certified false data or participated in possible irregularities. These are accusations made by Buxadé, not irregularities accredited in general.

Podemos accuses the Supreme Court of violating fundamental rights

The Secretary General of Podemos, Ione Belarra, has reacted with particular harshness to the resolution and has stated that "Justice is the greatest threat to democracy in this country".

In an appearance before the media in Congress, Belarra has accused the Supreme Court of having "stolen the right to vote" from about 160,000 citizens and has considered that the decision constitutes an "absolutely flagrant violation of fundamental rights."

The leader of Podemos has maintained that there is no legal provision that allows the withdrawal of the right to vote from a Spanish citizen in this way.

Belarra has also directed her criticisms at the Government of Pedro Sánchez, whom she reproaches for not having promoted a sufficient reform of the judicial system. In particular, she has accused the Executive of having "handed over control of the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) to the political right."

Sumar denounces a "politicized" resolution and points to PP and Vox

From Sumar, the deputy of the Comunes Gerardo Pisarello has described the Supreme Court's ruling as "absurd from a legal point of view" and has accused PP and Vox of using their influence over the Judiciary to limit the voting rights of Spanish citizens.

Pisarello has denounced that the decision is "politicized" and "unprecedented" and has questioned the actions of the reporting magistrate, Antonio Narváez, to whom he has attributed favorable statements regarding a potential presidency of the Government of Feijóo.

In the opinion of the parliamentarian, the ruling "flagrantly violates the Constitution and the democratic principle" and is part of a strategy by the right to sow doubts about electoral integrity.

The deputy has compared that strategy to the actions of Donald Trump in the United States and has called for a citizen response to what he considers an attempt to limit democratic rights through the courts.

About 163,000 affected voters and difficulties in applying the suspension

The Supreme Court's ruling potentially affects 163,020 people, according to figures provided by the State Attorney's Office. The Administrative Litigation Chamber has maintained the precautionary measure by five votes to one, with a dissenting opinion from one magistrate.

The high court considers that the protection of transparency and the integrity of the electoral roll justifies maintaining the suspension while the substance of the litigation is resolved. The measure allows those who duly prove the requirements demanded by law to vote.

The practical application remains one of the main problems. According to the information known this Tuesday, the Electronic Civil Registry allows identifying more than 70,000 naturalized, but there are around 90,000 files whose location requires additional checks.

The confrontation between the parties occurs, therefore, while it remains unresolved how to execute the measure before the 29N. The Supreme Court's decision is precautionary and does not imply a definitive ruling on the legality of the naturalizations, although its effects may prevent thousands of citizens from exercising their vote in the upcoming general elections.

More key points, information and questions with FREN

AI-GENERATED CONTENT

In which parliamentary phase is the possible reform of the democratic memory law currently located after this judicial resolution?

According to official data, the ongoing reform of Law 20/2022, on Democratic Memory, is currently in the Congress of Deputies, in the Constitutional Commission, in the amendment phase of a bill processed by the urgent procedure. It has not yet been definitively approved nor sent to the Senate, and in the parliamentary information consulted, there is no record of a new specific file linked to a particular judicial resolution.

The relevant reform originates from Royal Decree-Law 6/2026, of March 3, by which the Government modified Law 20/2022 to recognize and compensate people deceased or with disabling injuries due to their activity in defense and claim of democracy between 1968 and December 29, 1978. This royal decree-law was ratified by the Plenary of the Congress on March 26, 2026, with 173 votes in favor, 170 against, and 7 abstentions, and the Plenary itself agreed in the same session to process it as a bill by urgent procedure.

After ratification, the legislative initiative has been processed as Bill 121/000090, entitled:

"Bill modifying Law 20/2022, of October 19, on Democratic Memory, regarding recognition in favor of people deceased or with disabling injuries due to their activity in defense and claim of Democracy".

In the official Congress record, this bill is assigned to the Constitutional Commission, with full legislative competence and urgent processing. This means that, unless decided otherwise later, the Commission can approve the final text without the need for a new approval debate in the Plenary, although the Plenary already intervened in the ratification phase of the decree-law.

Regarding processing milestones:

  • The bill was registered after the ratification of the royal decree-law, in March 2026.
  • It was admitted and sent to the Constitutional Commission, which assumed full legislative competence.
  • A relatively brief amendment submission period was opened, consistent with urgent processing.
  • On April 29, 2026, total amendments were published, confirming that at least part of the debate is being structured around alternative texts proposed by some groups.

Parliamentary press also details that during this phase some groups — for example, Junts and the PP — have submitted alternative texts taking advantage of the process, and have even proposed repealing the Democratic Memory Law itself through their proposals. At the same time, the Government's partners condition their support on incorporating changes such as extending the recognition period or relaxing requirements for accessing compensations during the partial amendment process.

Regarding the Senate, there is no active file associated with this specific bill yet. That is, the Senate has not yet started processing this reform of the Democratic Memory Law because the text has not been sent to it. The entire formal process remains concentrated in the Congress, in the amendment and commission work phase.

In parallel, there are other initiatives related to democratic memory that modify or rely on Law 20/2022, such as the Bill Proposal for the recognition and equalization of victims of crimes by State agents (file 122/000263), or non-legislative proposals and motions in Congress and Senate. However, these latter have a non-normative character (they do not directly change the law) or focus on very specific aspects, so the structural reform in process of Law 20/2022 itself remains, for parliamentary purposes, the one derived from Royal Decree-Law 6/2026.

Regarding the reference to “this judicial resolution,” the consulted records — from Congress, Senate, and Government — do not formally link Bill 121/000090 to a specific sentence nor record the opening of a new reform file of Law 20/2022 as a direct reaction to a specific judicial ruling. Judicial resolutions may influence political debate and the content of amendments, but this does not automatically translate into a new procedural status in parliamentary records if no additional initiative is registered.

In summary, as of today, the “possible reform” of the Democratic Memory Law that is actually underway is located:

  • In the Congress, Constitutional Commission, with urgent processing.
  • In the amendment phase (total amendments have been submitted and published, and the focus shifts to partial ones).
  • Not yet arrived at the Senate nor definitively approved as law.

Any concrete impact of a recent judicial resolution would be channeled, if applicable, through new amendments or future initiatives, but does not by itself alter the currently registered parliamentary phase.

Could you detail which groups have submitted total amendments and what their alternative proposals on the Democratic Memory Law are? What deadlines and steps remain for this reform of Law 20/2022 to reach the Senate and be definitively approved? What practical effects does Royal Decree-Law 6/2026 already have today on compensations to victims, while the bill remains in processing?

What competencies and functions are attributed to Minister Elma Saiz according to Spanish legislation?

The competencies and functions of Elma Saiz as Minister of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations derive from two normative levels: on one hand, the rules that define the material scope and structure of the ministry (mainly the royal decrees of structure); on the other, the general regime of ministerial powers in Law 50/1997, of November 27, on the Government.

In the XV Legislature, the basic framework of the department is set in three main norms:

  • Royal Decree 829/2023, of November 20, which restructures ministerial departments, assigning the Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations its broad material areas of action.
  • Royal Decree 1009/2023, of December 5, which establishes the basic organic structure of ministerial departments, setting the common scheme of superior and directive bodies of all ministries.
  • Royal Decree 501/2024, of May 21, which develops the basic organic structure of the Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations and modifies Royal Decree 1009/2023, detailing the internal organization and detailed distribution of functions within the department itself.

On this basis, Spanish legislation attributes to the ministry led by Elma Saiz three major competency blocks:

1. Social Security, pensions, and civil service benefits

Royal Decree 501/2024, in connection with the general framework of Royal Decree 1009/2023, establishes that the Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations is responsible for the proposal and execution of Government policy on Social Security and civil service benefits. Among others, the following material functions derive from this:

  • Promote and direct the legal regulation of the Social Security system, including rules on contributions, benefits, and system management.
  • Direct and oversee the managing entities and common services of Social Security attached to the department, as well as coordination with other ministries when appropriate.
  • Design and execute government policy on contributory and non-contributory pensions and civil service benefits, within the framework of current legislation.
  • Participate in the preparation and execution of planning and control instruments for Social Security expenditure, consistent with general budgetary policy.
2. Foreign affairs, immigration, emigration, and Spaniards abroad

The same regulation assigns the ministry the development and implementation of Government policy on foreign affairs, immigration, and emigration. Mainly through the State Secretariat for Migrations, functions include:

  • Design and develop the State's migration policy, including integration and reception of migrants and refugees.
  • Manage programs and measures for return and support to Spanish citizens abroad, as well as attention to returned Spaniards.
  • Promote and coordinate actions of the General State Administration related to labor immigration, emigration, and foreign affairs, in coordination with other competent ministries (Interior, Foreign Affairs, Labor, etc.).
  • Provide institutional support to the General Council of Spanish Citizens Abroad and other consultative bodies linked to the Spanish diaspora.
3. Social inclusion policies

Royal Decree 501/2024 also assigns the ministry responsibility for inclusion and social protection policies. Under the General Secretariat for Inclusion, functions include:

  • Design, promote, and evaluate social inclusion policies aimed at vulnerable groups or those at risk of poverty and exclusion.
  • Coordinate, at the state level, measures aimed at equal opportunities and reducing social and economic gaps.
  • Supervise programs such as the Minimum Vital Income and other benefits or income guarantee instruments within its competencies.
4. General functions of the department head

Beyond material distribution, Law 50/1997, on the Government, sets the general powers of any minister, which apply to Elma Saiz as head of the Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations. Among them are:

  • Direct the Ministry's actions and develop Government action in the areas of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations.
  • Exercise regulatory power in the department's own matters, through orders and general provisions within the legal framework.
  • Set the Ministry's objectives, approve its action plans, and allocate necessary budgetary and human resources.
  • Direct and supervise the superior and directive bodies of the department (state secretariats, general secretariats, undersecretariat, general directorates, etc.).
  • Exercise superior inspection of the department's services and ensure compliance with laws within its scope.
  • Propose to the Council of Ministers bills, royal decree-laws, and royal decrees affecting its material area, as well as relevant agreements.
  • Enter into contracts and agreements within its competence and resolve administrative appeals attributed by the legal system.
  • Represent the Government in relations with autonomous communities and other public administrations in matters of inclusion, Social Security, and migrations.

In summary, Spanish legislation configures Elma Saiz as responsible for the political direction and highest administrative management of the set of state policies on Social Security, pensions, migrations, and social inclusion, within the framework set by the royal decrees of structure and the Government Law.

Could you detail more specifically what functions Royal Decree 501/2024 attributes to each State Secretariat and body of the Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations? What competency differences exist between the Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations and other ministries also involved in migration policy, such as Interior or Foreign Affairs? How are the competencies of the Minister of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations legally coordinated with those of autonomous communities in social services and inclusion?

What legal requirements must be met for a Spanish citizen residing abroad to be included in the electoral census?

For a Spanish citizen residing abroad to be included in the electoral census, the basic regulation is the LOREG (Organic Law of the General Electoral Regime) and its development rules, especially those related to the Electoral Census of Absent Resident Spaniards (CERA) and the census of Spaniards temporarily abroad (ERTA). The key is to distinguish whether the residence abroad is permanent or temporary, because the requirements and type of census differ.

1. General common requirements

Generally, every Spaniard who wants to appear in the electoral census (in Spain or abroad) must meet:

  • Be Spanish and not have lost nationality.
  • Be of legal age (18 years old on the day of voting).
  • Not be deprived of the right to vote by a final judicial sentence or legally established incapacity.
  • Be correctly registered in the relevant administrative records (municipal register or consular register, as applicable).

From there, the difference is whether the citizen is a permanent resident abroad (CERA) or is temporarily outside Spain (ERTA).

2. Spaniards permanently residing abroad (CERA)

Spaniards who habitually live outside Spain are registered in the Electoral Census of Absent Resident Spaniards (CERA). To appear in it, they must practically meet these requirements:

  • Registration in the Consular Register as a resident at the consular office corresponding to their address abroad. This certifies that their residence outside Spain is permanent or long-term.
  • Once registered as residents, they become part of the Register of Spaniards Residing Abroad (PERE), which is the basis on which the Electoral Census Office prepares the CERA.
  • The registration and data (name, nationality, date of birth, province of assignment, address in the country of residence, etc.) must be updated at the consulate, as the census is fed from there.
  • Be registered in the PERE/CERA before the census closing date taken as reference for each election (a fixed date prior to the call). Those who register later usually do not enter that election but the following ones.
  • Not have any cause of exclusion from the right to vote communicated by courts or the Administration to the Electoral Census Office.

Inclusion in the CERA is not a specific request by each voter for each election, but the result of being correctly registered as a resident at the consulate and, through that, in the PERE. However, when the census is displayed at consulates for each call, the voter can file claims (for undue exclusion, data errors, etc.) within the legal period; the Electoral Census Office resolves and corrects if appropriate.

In recent years, a relevant element has been added: people who have acquired nationality through the so-called “grandchildren law” (eighth additional provision of Law 20/2022, on Democratic Memory) can only appear in the CERA if their nationality and consular registration meet legal conditions and are not affected by precautionary measures or ongoing judicial reviews. In some cases, the Supreme Court has ordered the temporary suspension of certain registrations in the CERA linked to this nationality access route, which implies that, while the measure lasts, those people are not integrated into the external electoral census even if they remain Spanish.

3. Spaniards temporarily abroad (ERTA)

Spaniards who maintain their habitual residence in Spain but are temporarily abroad (for studies, work, prolonged tourism, etc.) fall under the ERTA regime. Their requirements differ:

  • Remain registered in a Spanish municipality; it is that register that determines their inclusion in the general census of residents in Spain.
  • Be physically outside Spain at the time of the call and during the electoral process, but without having become a permanent resident in the consulate.
  • Within the deadline set by the electoral calendar, request at the consular office their status as temporarily absent voter, accrediting their registration in the census in Spain and their stay abroad.

In this case, inclusion in the census is not a new registration in the CERA, but a specific annotation that allows voting from abroad (usually by mail or at consular premises) while maintaining census status in their Spanish municipality.

4. Review and guarantees

In both cases (CERA and ERTA), the LOREG provides:

  • The public display of the census and the possibility of claiming at consulates or town halls for a few days.
  • The obligation of the Electoral Census Office to resolve promptly and make appropriate corrections.
  • The control and supervision of the Central Electoral Board, which sets criteria and resolves interpretative doubts.

In summary, a Spanish citizen residing abroad will only be included in the electoral census if: they maintain nationality, are 18 years old, are not deprived of suffrage, and are correctly registered, either as a permanent resident in the consulate (CERA/PERE) or as a resident in Spain declaring temporary absence (ERTA), all within the deadlines and formal requirements set by LOREG and its development rules.

Could you explain in detail how the Electoral Census of Absent Residents (CERA) is prepared and updated? What specific steps must a Spaniard newly arrived abroad follow to register correctly at the consulate and be included in the CERA? How does the claims system work if a resident abroad finds they have been excluded from the electoral census?

Play

Test your knowledge with FREN!

How much do you know about this topic? Answer the following 3 questions.

What decision has the Supreme Court made regarding the inclusion in the census of those naturalized under the 'grandchildren law'?

Question 1 of 3

What is the main argument the Government holds regarding the Supreme Court's resolution?

Question 2 of 3

How many citizens are potentially affected by the Supreme Court's resolution according to the State Attorney's Office?

Question 3 of 3